Effects of Ketamine in the Acute Phase of Suicidal Ideation (KETIS)

November 24, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Evaluation of the Effects of Ketamine in the Acute Phase of Suicidal Ideation: a Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Trial

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of ketamine versus a placebo for the short-term (at 72h, i.e. 24h after the last perfusion) relief of suicidal ideation, measured using the BSS hetero questionnaire, in patients hospitalized for suicide risk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess:

A. The maintenance of medium-term effectiveness of ketamine on the resolution of suicidal ideation

B. The evolution of the full spectrum of suicidality under ketamine compared to placebo

C. The evolution of psychic and physical pain scores under ketamine compared to placebo

D. The evolution of Beck Hopelessness score which is a predictor of long-term suicide risk, under ketamine compared to placebo

E. The early antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in depressed, uni- or bipolar patients

F. The somatic and psychological tolerance of ketamine

G. An overall improvement in the clinical condition of the patient by the practitioner

H. Creation of a biological collection for future ancillary studies dedicated to genetic analysis (microRNA and mRNA).

I. The efficacy of ketamine versus a placebo for the short-term (at 72h, i.e. 24h after the last perfusion) relief of suicidal ideation, measured using the BSS self-report questionnaire, in patients hospitalized for suicide risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Michel Fontan
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
      • Nîmes, France, 30000
        • Clinique Les Sophoras
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière
      • Paris, France, 75674
        • CMME Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne
      • Paris, France, 75674
        • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne
      • Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, France, 37540
        • CHRU de Tours - Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • French speaking patients freely hospitalized for prevention of suicide and who have a medium or high suicide risk score according to a MINI structured interview
  • The patient is able to understand how the study is carried out and the tests performed
  • The patient is deemed capable of giving his/her informed consent
  • The patient has been correctly informed
  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent.
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
  • Presence of suicidal ideation according to the SSI score (score > 3)
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another interventional study
  • Within the past three months, the patient has participated in another interventional study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection
  • The patient is an adult under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • The patient is not able to understand the informed consent
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • History of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders
  • Presence of psychotic symptoms at initial interview
  • Schizoid or schizotypic personality disorder
  • Positive urine screening for illicit substances, excluding cannabis
  • Substance dependence in the preceding month (excluding nicotine or caffeine)
  • Concomitant treatment with electroconvulsive therapy
  • Unstable somatic pathology
  • Clinically significant anomalies found during clinical examination, biological test or ECG
  • Non-stabilized hypertension or hypertension > 180/100
  • Known or suspected contra-indication for ketamine (includes interactions): hypersensitivity to ketamine, hypertension, class IV cardiac insufficiency, history of stroke, hepatic or cutaneous porphyria, history of intracranial hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ketamine

Patients randomized to this group will be treated via Ketamine infusion.

Intervention: Baseline evaluation Intervention: 1st perfusion of ketamine Intervention: Follow-up between perfusions Intervention: 2nd perfusion of ketamine Intervention: Follow-up after perfusions

Before perfusions begin, each patient will have a baseline evaluation including the following: the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI), a physical pain VAS (visual analog scale), a mental pain VAS, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S), Beck's Hopeless scale (BHS), the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology for the Clinician (IDS-C30), the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).
A 1st perfusion of ketamine is performed: 0.5 mg/kg diluted in saline, administered over 40 minutes by intravenous (IV) pump and cardiorespiratory monitoring. (Day 0)
Patients will be re-evaluated with a selection of questionnaires at 40 minutes, 120 minutes, 4 hours, and 24 hours after the end of the first perfusion, and then again at 48 hours after the end of the first perfusion and right before the second perfusion and then again Day 3, Day 4, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6.
A 2nd perfusion of ketamine is performed: 0.5 mg/kg diluted in saline, administered over 40 minutes by intravenous (IV) pump and cardiorespiratory monitoring. (Day 2)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo/Control

Patients randomized to this group will be treated via saline solution infusion.

Intervention: Baseline evaluation Intervention: 1st perfusion of saline Intervention: Follow-up between perfusions Intervention: 2nd perfusion of saline Intervention: Follow-up after perfusions

Before perfusions begin, each patient will have a baseline evaluation including the following: the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI), a physical pain VAS (visual analog scale), a mental pain VAS, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S), Beck's Hopeless scale (BHS), the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology for the Clinician (IDS-C30), the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).
Patients will be re-evaluated with a selection of questionnaires at 40 minutes, 120 minutes, 4 hours, and 24 hours after the end of the first perfusion, and then again at 48 hours after the end of the first perfusion and right before the second perfusion and then again Day 3, Day 4, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6.
A 1st perfusion of saline is performed: the same volume of saline as in the ketamine arm, administered over 40 minutes by IV pump and cardiorespiratory monitoring. (Day 0)
A 2nd perfusion of saline is performed: the same volume of saline as in the ketamine arm, administered over 40 minutes by IV pump and cardiorespiratory monitoring. (Day 2)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BSSI score
Time Frame: Day 3
A suicidal ideation score measured using the BSS (Beck et al. 1979) in its hetero questionnaire form ≤ 3 at 24 hours after the second infusion of ketamine or placebo (yes/no). A threshold ≤ 3 separates the resolution of suicidal ideas from their persistence (Holi et al. 2005; DiazGranados et al. 2010).
Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The occurrence of a suicide attempt or a completed suicide (yes/no)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of the full spectrum of suicidality using the CSSRS
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
The BSSI score
Time Frame: 40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
The BSSI score
Time Frame: 120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
The BSSI score
Time Frame: 4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
The BSSI score
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of physical pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: 4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of mental pain using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 following a Lickert model
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of despair using the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: 4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of depression by the clinician (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Evaluation of somatic tolerance of ketamine using the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE) throughout follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of somatic tolerance of ketamine using the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE) throughout follow-up
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of somatic tolerance of ketamine using the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE) throughout follow-up
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of somatic tolerance of ketamine using the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE) throughout follow-up
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of somatic tolerance of ketamine using the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE) throughout follow-up
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of psychic tolerance using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Presence/absence of abnormal monitoring values throughout the study: hypertension
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Any abnormal hypertension, pulse oxymetry or cardiac frequency values observed during the study will be noted.
6 weeks
Presence/absence of abnormal monitoring values throughout the study: pulse oxymetry
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Any abnormal hypertension, pulse oxymetry or cardiac frequency values observed during the study will be noted.
6 weeks
Presence/absence of abnormal monitoring values throughout the study: cardiac frequency
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Any abnormal hypertension, pulse oxymetry or cardiac frequency values observed during the study will be noted.
6 weeks
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Baseline (Day-2 to Day 0)
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
40 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
120 min after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
4 hours after end of 1st perfusion (Day 0)
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Day 2
Day 2
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 120 min after end of 2nd perfusion (Day 2)
120 min after end of 2nd perfusion (Day 2)
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Evaluation of the improvement of the patient's clinical condition using the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
The BSSI score
Time Frame: 24 hours after the last perfusion
A suicidal ideation score measured using the BSS (Beck et al. 1979) in its self report questionnaire form ≤ 3 at 24 hours after the second infusion of ketamine or placebo (yes/no). This scale is validated in French (de Man, Balkou & Iglesias 1987); a threshold ≤ 3 separates the resolution of suicidal ideas from their persistence (Holi et al. 2005; DiazGranados et al. 2010)
24 hours after the last perfusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mocrane Abbar, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicidal Ideation

Clinical Trials on Baseline evaluation

Subscribe