Comparison of Reduced Cuff-pressure of the Laryngeal Tube Under General Anesthesia (LTS)

January 16, 2015 updated by: Marc Kriege, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Comparative Study of the Tightness of the Laryngeal Tube Under Mechanical Ventilation Before and After Reduction of Cuff Pressure on 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂O or 30cmH₂O

Optimization the cuff pressure of the laryngeal tube (LT) in relation of the mechanical ventilation, and the reduction of potential leakage mucosal trauma. Comparison of the tightness of LT between the filling volume specified by the manufacturer (connectors are color coded syringe and blocker), 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂Ound 30cmH₂O. The measurement of the leakage occurs in ml / kg body weight.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ventilation of both cuffs of the laryngeal tube by using the color coding of syringe and connector is a simple, fast and easy way to stabilize the tube and secure seal against the surrounding tissue.

The user of this method has only knowledge of the volume (ml), with which the cuff is vented, but not over the cuff pressure (cmH₂O) itself.

Permanently high pressures can cause to a lesions to necrosis in the adjacent tissue, on the other hand, the material of the bulging cuff fits less well the anatomy of the patient, leading to leaks in the breathing circuit.

Studies of pediatric anesthesia show that on 40cmH₂O reduces the volume of the leak in the laryngeal mask airway by reducing the cuff pressure and the ventilation is improved in sequence.

In the proposed study, the volume of leakage at the fill volume specified by the manufacturer (color coding), 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂O and 30cmH₂O to be captured.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhineland-Palatinate
      • Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, D55131
        • Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 Years
  • No concurrent participation in another study
  • capacity to consent
  • Present written informed consent of the research participant
  • Elective surgery under general anesthesia
  • Height> 150cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Existing pregnancy
  • Lack of consent
  • inability to consent
  • emergency patients
  • Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
  • ASA classification> 3
  • situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
  • Indications for intubation with endotracheal tube
  • Height <150cm
  • Participation in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduce Cuff Pressure
Cuff Pressure difference between inspiration and expiration is measured.
We reduce the Cuff Pressure from the LTS-D (Laryngeal Tube suction) from 60 to 50 to 40 to 30cmH2O and measure the Delta from Inspiration to Expiration Tidalvolume (Delta Vt). The Delta Vt shows the actual leakage.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Leakage between the different Cuff Pressure
Time Frame: < 5 Minutes
We want to measure the tightness of the reduced Cuff Pressure
< 5 Minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rüdiger Noppens, MD, University JG, Mainz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JohannesGU

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Morbidity

Clinical Trials on Reduce Cuff pressure

Subscribe