Feasibility of a Self-performed Urinary Test for the Follow-up on Medical Abortion

December 4, 2014 updated by: Nordic Pharma SAS

This study was a national, longitudinal, prospective, observational survey, carried out in metropolitan France, with a sampling of 21 birth control centres.

The aim of this study was to assess, in real life conditions, the benefit of a urinary semi-quantitative test (hCG Duo 5-1000) in the follow-up of medical abortion by analysing the concordance between qualitative results from the urinary test and quantitative values from the beta-hCG blood measurement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

322

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
        • Cabinet Medical

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women asking for medical abortion

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult women (18 years old or more), pregnant the day of the medical examination and asking for medical abortion.
  • Patients agreeing to participate in the study after have been informed orally by the physician and given the information sheet.
  • Informed patients accepting the computer processing of their medical data and their right of access and correction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with more than 49 Days of Amenorrhea (DA) for private practice and 63 DA for hospital practice.
  • Patients with contraindications to medical abortion.
  • Patients with severe and progressive disease.
  • Patients unable to complete a questionnaire.
  • Patients refusing to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
concordance between qualitative results from the urinary test and quantitative values from the beta-hCG blood measurement.
Time Frame: At the follow-up at 2-3 weeks after inclusion

There was concordance if :

  • The result of urinary test is < 1000 IU/L and the value of β-hCG blood measurement was < 1000 IU/L, Or if
  • The result of urinary test is ≥ 1000 iu/L and the value of β-hCG blood measurement was ≥ 1000 IU/L.

There was discrepancy if:

  • The result of urinary test is ≥ 1000 IU/L and the value of β-hCG blood measurement was < 1000 IU/L, Or if
  • The result of urinary test is < 1000 IU/L and the value of β-hCG blood measurement was ≥ 1000 IU/L.
At the follow-up at 2-3 weeks after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the urinary semi-quantitative test by the patient
Time Frame: at the follow up at 2-3 weeks after the inclusion

The analysis of the acceptability is descriptive:

  • The rate of patients who performed the urinary test.
  • Assessment of the urinary test by physicIan : very easy/easy/difficult/Impossible
  • The assessment by the patient: questionnaire (Have you found the explanations given sufficient for performing the test?, How did you find the carrying out of this test? What are your feelings about checking the results of the medical abortion yourself?)
at the follow up at 2-3 weeks after the inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle HASSOUN, MD, Cabinet Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BETINA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abortion; Attempted, Medical

Subscribe