Neurocognitive and Radiological Assessments in Adult Moyamoya Undergoing Surgery (NRAAMUS)

August 21, 2017 updated by: Yu Lei, Huashan Hospital

Neurocognitive and Radiological Assessments in Adult Patients With Moyamoya Disease Undergoing Surgical Revascularization

Adult patients with moyamoya disease (MMD) are reported to suffer from considerable impairment of executive function/attention. Although reduced cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) in frontal areas has been detected by perfusion MRI and then confirmed to be associated with executive dysfunction in adult MMD, the structural and functional changes is still unclear with progression of executive dysfunction. Furthermore, it is very important to study the association between the neurocognitive and radiological improvement after surgical revascularization, so as to help detecting cerebral regions which are involved in executive deterioration or improvement after surgery. Then the investigators can determine whether these regions can be used as indicators to decide rational therapeutic schedule and timing of adult MMD with executive dysfunction.

Thus the aim of this study is to primarily find out the neuropsychological and radiological correlates in adult MMD, and then to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of surgical revascularization in prevention of executive dysfunction in adult MMD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Previous studies of adult moyamoya disease (MMD) have revealed that vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is the consequence of ischemic damage to dynamic factors such as cerebral hypoperfusion, rather than to cerebral gray matter. However, it is still unclear which regions are affected by MMD and how these regions respond to the progressive cognitive decline. In other way, the investigators need to detect spatial patterns in the brain activity of MMD in order to understand its pathophysiological nature.

Surgical revascularization has been accepted as the only effective form of treatment in preventing future ischemic episodes. However, its effectiveness in cognitive protection is still unknown. Thus, the investigators determine to quantitatively evaluate cognitive and radiological outcomes in adult MMD postoperatively and during follow-ups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jiabin Su, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed Chinese people aged over 18 years
  • No evidence of recent or remote infarct in the cerebral cortical, basal ganglia, brainstem or cerebellum
  • No evidence of recent or remote intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Diagnosis confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) according to Suzuki scale
  • No surgical intervention before recruitment
  • Physically capable of cognitive testing
  • Geographically accessible and reliable for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant neurological diseases or psychiatric disorders that could affect cognition
  • Other cerebrovascular diseases (such as atherosclerosis or vasculitides) likely to cause focal cerebral ischemia
  • Concomitant cerebrovascular diseases (such as aneurysms or arteriovenous malformation) that need surgical intervention
  • Severe systemic diseases
  • Pregnant or perinatal stage women
  • Any diseases likely to death within 2 yeas
  • Taking drugs such as benzodiazepine clonazepam
  • Any contraindications or allergy to aspirin
  • Allergy to iodine or radiographic contrast media
  • Past history of surgical revascularization
  • Concurrent participation in any other experimental treatment trial
  • Any condition that in the surgeon's judgment suggests the patient an unsuitable surgical candidate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: surgical revascularization
Patients will be assigned to either surgical or conservative treatment depending on their clinical symptoms and radiological assessment.
Most patients in this group will be performed combined procedures of superficial temporal to middle cerebral artery bypass (STA-MCA) and encephalo-duro-myo-synangiosis (EDMS). Patients not suitable for combined procedures will be performed EDMS.
Experimental: conservative treatment
Normal conservative treatment without surgical intervention.
Patients will be medically treated with antiplatelets, antiepileptics, antihypertensives and vasodilators depending on the presentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurocognitive outcomes at 3/6/12/24-month follow-up after surgical revascularization or conservative treatment.
Time Frame: 2 years
Measure neurocognitive outcomes with a battery of neuropsychological tests covering global cognition, executive, memory, language, and visuospatial functions. It involves the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), the Memory and Executive Screening test (MES), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), the verbal fluency test (VFT), the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test (CFT), etc.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of participants who suffer from all stroke or death during 30 days to 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The number of participants who suffer from all kinds of adverse events related to surgery.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Postoperative neurocognitive outcomes before discharge.
Time Frame: average of 1 week after surgery
Measure neurocognitive outcomes about 1 week after surgery according to participants' physical condition, using the tests mentioned in the primary outcome measurement.
average of 1 week after surgery
Postoperative radiological outcomes before discharge.
Time Frame: average of 1 week after surgery
Measure cerebral perfusion simultaneously with neurocognitive testing, using the single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
average of 1 week after surgery
The changes from baseline in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS).
Time Frame: at 7 days, 30 days, 3/6/12/24 months
at 7 days, 30 days, 3/6/12/24 months
The changes from baseline in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The changes from baseline in blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) during rest.
Time Frame: 2 years
Data analysis techniques include amplitude of frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), independent component analysis (ICA), voxel-based morphometry analysis (VBM), etc.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yuxiang Gu, MD,PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Moyamoya Disease

Clinical Trials on Surgical Revascularization

3
Subscribe