Study of Acetaminophen (ACE) in Post-operative Dental Pain

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active- Controlled, Single-Dose, Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics Proof of Concept Study of a Test Acetaminophen 500 mg Tablet in Postoperative Dental Pain

This is a dental pain study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single dose of test acetaminophen (ACE) (1000 mg) compared to commercial acetaminophen (1000 mg), ibuprofen (IBU) (400 mg), and placebo over a 6 hour period. Subjects will undergo dental extraction of three or four third molars.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Jean Brown Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Are 17 to 50 years of age
  2. Weigh 100 lbs or greater and body mass index (BMI) 18 to 30 (inclusive)
  3. Dental extraction of three or four third-molars.
  4. Experience moderate to severe pain after extraction of third molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently pregnant (or planning to be pregnant) or nursing a baby
  2. Known allergy to acetaminophen (ACE) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
  3. Inability to swallow whole large tablets or capsules
  4. Have other conditions that the investigator feels may impact subject's safety and/or the integrity of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
2 placebo caplets for acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 placebo soft-gels for ibuprofen taken orally one time
2 placebo tablets for Test acetaminophen taken orally one time
Experimental: Test Acetaminophen (ACE) (1000 mg) and placebo
2 Test ACE 500 mg tablets taken orally one time
2 placebo caplets for acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 placebo soft-gels for ibuprofen taken orally one time
2 placebo tablets for Test acetaminophen taken orally one time
Active Comparator: Commerical ACE (1000 mg) and placebo
2 placebo caplets for acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 placebo soft-gels for ibuprofen taken orally one time
2 placebo tablets for Test acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 ACE 500 mg caplets taken orally one time
Active Comparator: Commerical Ibuprofen (IBU) (400 mg) and placebo
2 placebo caplets for acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 placebo soft-gels for ibuprofen taken orally one time
2 placebo tablets for Test acetaminophen taken orally one time
2 IBU 200 mg soft-gels taken orally one time

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time weighted sum of pain intensity difference from 0-6 hours (SPID 0-6)
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Time weighted sum of pain intensity difference scores from baseline over 6 hours. Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
6 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time weighted sum of pain intensity difference from 0-4 hours (SPID 0-4)
Time Frame: 4 Hours
Time weighted sum of pain intensity difference scores from baseline over 4 hours. Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
4 Hours
Time to meaningful pain relief
Time Frame: Within 6 Hours
Minutes until meaningful pain relief are achieved. Stopwatch is started after the subject takes the study medication. The subjects are instructed to stop the stopwatch when the relief from the starting pain is meaningful to them.
Within 6 Hours
Time to first perceptible pain relief
Time Frame: Within 6 Hours
Minutes until first perceptible pain relief is achieved. Stopwatch is started after the subject takes the study medication. The subject is instructed to stop the stopwatch when they first begin to feel any pain relief.
Within 6 Hours
Time to confirmed first perceptible relief
Time Frame: Within 6 Hours
Minutes until confirmed first perceptible pain relief are achieved. Stopwatch is started after the subject takes the study medication. The subject is instructed to stop the stopwatch when they first begin to feel any pain relief. The first perceptible pain relief is confirmed if the subject also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful pain relief.
Within 6 Hours
Time weighted sum of pain relief from 0-4 (TOTPAR 0-4)
Time Frame: 4 hours
Time weighted sum of pain relief scores over four hours. Pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
4 hours
Time weighted sum of pain relief from 0-6 (TOTPAR 0-6)
Time Frame: 6 hours
Time weighted sum of pain relief scores over six hours. Pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
6 hours
Duration of relief after dosing (time to rescue analgesic)
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Minutes until rescue medication is given
6 Hours
Proportion of subjects taking a rescue analgesic by 6 hours
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Percentage of subjects using rescue medication through six hours
6 Hours
Subject Global Evaluation assessed at hour 6 or at time of rescue
Time Frame: 6 hours
Patient assessment of the pain medication - number of subjects rating the medication they received as a pain reliever on a score of 0-4, where 0=poor, 1=fair, 2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent
6 hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 0.25 Hours
Time Frame: 0.25 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
0.25 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 0.5 Hours
Time Frame: 0.5 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
0.5 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 0.75 Hours
Time Frame: 0.75 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
0.75 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 1 Hours
Time Frame: 1 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
1 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 1.25 Hours
Time Frame: 1.25 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
1.25 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 1.5 Hours
Time Frame: 1.5 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
1.5 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2 hoursH
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
2 hoursH
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 3 Hours
Time Frame: 3 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
3 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
4 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 5 Hours
Time Frame: 5 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
5 Hours
Pain relief (PAR) scores at 6 Hours
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Pain relief scores at each assessment time point - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-10 pain relief numerical rating scale (PR-NRS) where 0 = no relief and 10 = complete relief
6 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 0.25 Hours
Time Frame: 0.25 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
0.25 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 0.5 Hours
Time Frame: 0.5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
0.5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 0.75 Hours
Time Frame: 0.75 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
0.75 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 1 Hours
Time Frame: 1 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
1 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 1.25 Hours
Time Frame: 1.25 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
1.25 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 1.5 Hours
Time Frame: 1.5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
1.5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
2 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 3 Hours
Time Frame: 3 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
3 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
4 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 5 Hours
Time Frame: 5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
5 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) at 6 Hours
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at each assessment time point - Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain
6 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Acetaminophen (ACE) (1000 mg)

3
Subscribe