Changes in Brain Activity Associated With Upper Limb Motor Recovery

April 14, 2022 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

Changes in Cortical Excitability Associated With Upper Limb Motor Recovery - a Study of Neural Strategies Employed in Motor Recovery

This study is to investigate changes in brain activities in acute stroke patients , and to correlate findings with clinical outcome measures. Another aim of the study is to investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could improve motor function in subjects with poor brain activity after stroke. The brain activity will be measured by single and paired pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation). The study hypothesizes that:

  1. The neural mechanisms employed in patients who have different response to TMS stimulation are different. It is hypothesized that patients with no response upon TMS stimulation might have poorer motor function outcome, compared with patients with response upon TMS stimulation.
  2. The result of clinical outcome measures is related with TMS measurement.
  3. tDCS intervention is beneficial to subjects with poor brain activity. Clinical outcome measures will include a battery of upper limb motor tests such as upper extremity component of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Ashworth scale for spasticity, box and block test, and manual muscle testing. Clinical outcome and TMS measurement will be assessed at within 2 weeks, 4-6 weeks and at 6 months post-stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

TMS measurement and clinical outcome measurement will be performed on 119 stroke subjects with upper limb impairment with FMA score at 0-45 at within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke. It is important to know the cortical excitability as well as clinical outcome measurement at the same time point, at different stages of stroke including acute phase, which enables us to know the interaction between brain activity and functional outcome. In addition, studies have shown both TMS (Pennisi et al, 1999) and clinical outcome measurement (FMA)(De Weerdt and Harrison 1985; Bernspang et al. 1987; Feys et al. 2000) are measurable at acute phase after stroke.

Subjects will be recruited from the existing patients on the study physician's cohort of patients and from referrals from attending physicians. During the initial screening visit, FMA will be administered by trained research staff, the questionnaire of MMSE will also be administered by trained research staff for subject's cognitive assessment. Subjects' eligibility will be verified by self-report from the participants as well as their medical records accessed by participating physicians. It will be ascertained that subject fulfills criteria for participation and informed consent will be obtained by study staff. Subjects will be fully briefed in detail regarding the experimental procedure, risk and benefits involved and their responsibilities during the study. Subject will continue with their routine rehabilitation training when they are in the trial.

For patients whose MEP could not be induced by single pulse TMS stimulation, they will be randomly divided into 2 groups with one group receiving 1mA tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes to the primary motor cortex of cortical representation of the hand, while the other group will receive sham stimulation of tDCS.

A research staff supervised by a physician will apply the tDCS to subjects whose MEP could not be induced by TMS stimulation to the corresponding cortex area. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrode (35cm2) and delivered by a battery-operated, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 10mA, through a non-metallic conductor rubber electrode. Stimulation will be conducted at the intensity of 1 mA and last for 20 minutes. The anode will be placed over the affected primary motor cortex (M1) of cortical representation of the hand, while the cathode will be used as reference electrode and placed over the forehead of the unaffected side. The same stimulation parameters as tDCS treatment will be employed for the sham stimulation. However, the current will be applied for 30 seconds only, to give subjects the sensation of the stimulation. Current intensity will be increased and decreased gradually (0-1mA) to decrease perception. It is postulated to recruit 20 subjects for each intervention group. The real or sham tDCS intervention will be conducted daily for 10 days after the first and before the second TMS assessment, i.e., between 2 to 6 weeks after the stroke onset. And the real or sham tDCS will be conducted before the daily traditional rehabilitation training, if any.

A research staff supervised by a physician will apply TMS measurement of the cortical excitability and intracortical inhibition/facilitation to the subject. Patients will be seated comfortably and instructed to remain as still as they can. A tight swim cap will be worn by the subject. The vertex will be marked on the cap. Singe pulse TMS was delivered using Magstim Bistim² stimulator via the coil of figure of eight. The coil position was maintained manually by an assistant and the handle of the coil point to posterior with an angel of 45 degree to the sagittal plane. Surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes are attached to the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) for EMG recording. The "hot spot" of the motor evoked potential (MEP) from APB is first identified and marked for both left and right side. This spot will be used for all recordings on that side. The lowest intensity needed to elicit a MEP response of at least 50µV amplitude and that has been elicited in 50% of 8 successive trials will be recorded as resting motor threshold (RMT).

For intracortical inhibition/facilitation recording, a first subthreshold conditioning stimulus (80% of RMT) will be applied, followed by a second suprathreshold stimulus (120% of RMT) with a variable interstimulus interval (ISI). The following ISIs - 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15 ms will be used. The percentage of change for each ISI before and after TMS will be calculated from the MEPs and will therefore provide a measure of change in intracortical facilitation and inhibition. Both single- and paired-pulse paradigms will be performed on the affected and unaffected hemisphere.

Clinical outcome measurement includes a battery of upper limb motor tests: Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Ashworth scale for spasticity, manual muscle testing and box and block test, which will be performed by a trained research staff.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female aged 21-80 years;
  2. First ever haemorrhagic or ischaemic hemiplegic stroke less than 1 month prior to study enrollment;
  3. Upper extremity impairment of 0-45 out of a maximum score of 66 on the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale.
  4. MMSE>=24.
  5. Be able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

pregnancy; cardiac pacemakers; orthodontics (braces); metal implant; history of epilepsy; sensorimotor disturbance due to other causes other than stroke; uncontrolled medical conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and unstable angina; major depression and a history of psychotic disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: real tDCS
Subjects will receive tDCS stimulation at the intensity of 1 mA and last for 20 minutes. The anode will be placed over the affected primary motor cortex (M1) of cortical representation of the hand, while the cathode will be used as reference electrode and placed over the forehead of the unaffected side.
Device: tDCS
tDCS could deliver either real or sham stimulation.
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
Subjects will receive sham tDCS stimulation. The same stimulation parameters as tDCS treatment will be employed for the sham stimulation. However, the current will be applied for 30 seconds only, to give subjects the sensation of the stimulation.
Device: tDCS
tDCS could deliver either real or sham stimulation.
No Intervention: no stimulation
Subjects will not received any intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) measurement of cortical excitability
Time Frame: within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of upper limb motor function in terms of Modified Ashworth scale for spasticity
Time Frame: within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
Change of upper limb motor function in terms of Manual muscle testing
Time Frame: within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
Change of upper limb motor function in terms of Box and block test
Time Frame: within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
Change of upper limb motor function in terms of Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke
within 1 month from stroke, 6-8 weeks post-stroke, 6 months post-stroke

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

National University Hospital, Singapore

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Effie Chew, MD, National University Hospital, Singapore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TMS2014/00358

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in South Africa

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe