A Randomised Trial Comparing Supraclavicular Block vs Supraclavicular and Pecs II Block in Arteriovenous Grafting

July 17, 2017 updated by: Kelvin Quek How Yow, Changi General Hospital

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block With Combined Supraclavicular and Pecs II Block in Patients Undergoing Arteriovenous Grafting Surgery

This study evaluates the addition of Pecs II block to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing arteriovenous graft creation surgery. Participants will be randomised into two equal groups, one receiving supraclavicular and pecs II blocks, the other receiving supraclavicular block and sham block (Grade 1).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Regional anaesthesia (RA) for arteriovenous grafting surgery has advantages of avoiding risks of general anaesthesia (GA) in this group of patients with significant co-morbidities, and beneficial vasodilatation, which may prevent early fistula thrombosis. Hence, RA is preferable to GA for this surgery.

Brachial plexus blocks (BPB) are the most commonly employed RA technique to anaesthetise the upper limb for this surgery. According to the results of a recent 2-year retrospective audit in our centre, ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB are the most popular RA technique for this surgery. Anatomically, the T1 and T2 dermatomes are often missed by the supraclavicular BPB. This means that the upper medial arm and axilla (sites involved in brachiobasilic and brachioaxillary arteriovenous grafting) may not be adequately anaesthetised, mandating intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeon. This may affect patients' and surgeons' acceptance of, and satisfaction with the RA technique. The ultrasound-guided Pecs II block, described by Blanco et al, seems to address this problem, as the intercostal T1-6, intercostobrachialis, long thoracic nerves and nerve to serratus anterior are targeted by this block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 529889
        • Changi General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for arteriovenous grafting under regional anaesthesia in Changi General Hospital
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 to 4
  • Elective or emergency surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give consent, unable to communicate or cooperate with simple instructions
  • Patients with regular consumption of strong opioids (eg. morphine, oxycodone) or steroids
  • Patients with allergy or contraindications to local anaesthetics or any of the drugs included in this study
  • Patients with pre-existing upper limb neurological deficits
  • Patients who refuse or are unsuitable for regional anaesthesia (eg. severely coagulopathic)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined (C)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and Pecs II block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml.
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Ultrasound guided interfascial plane block between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior
Local anaesthetic solution administered for supraclavicular block
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Local anaesthetic solution administered for pecs II block
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Active Comparator: Supraclavicular (S)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and sham block (grade 1)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Local anaesthetic solution administered for supraclavicular block
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Sham block -- with skin preparation, ultrasound scanning of pecs II block area, but no actual needle injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeon
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Whether there was a need for the surgeon to infiltrate a standardised local anaesthetic drug (0.5% ropivacaine) to the operative site during surgery
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation administered
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Total volume of local anaesthetic drug (0.5% ropivacaine) given by the surgeon
Intraoperative
Need for additional sedation or systemic analgesia
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Whether there was a need for additional sedation or systemic analgesia (on top of what is specified in the protocol)
Intraoperative
Highest pain score at Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour post-operatively
Highest pain score on visual analogue scale at the post-anaesthesia care unit
Up to 1 hour post-operatively
Time to first post-operative analgesia
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours post-operatively
Duration of time from administration of the block(s) to when patient first requests for oral analgesia. Participants will be followed up for 24 hours after surgery.
Up to 24 hours post-operatively
Pain score at 12h
Time Frame: 12 hours post-operatively
Pain score on visual analogue scale 12 hours after surgery
12 hours post-operatively
Pain score at 24h
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
Pain score on visual analogue scale 24 hours after surgery
24 hours post-operatively
Patient satisfaction at 24hours
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
Patient satisfaction with the anaesthesia technique on a 5-point Likert scale 24 hours after surgery
24 hours post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelvin Quek, MMED (Anaes), Changi General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Failure, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Supraclavicular

3
Subscribe