Study of Etanercept Monotherapy vs Methotrexate Monotherapy for Maintenance of Rheumatoid Arthritis Remission

January 9, 2023 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized Withdrawal Double-blind Study of Etanercept Monotherapy Compared to Methotrexate Monotherapy for Maintenance of Remission in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of etanercept monotherapy compared to methotrexate monotherapy on maintenance of remission in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were on etanercept plus methotrexate therapy.

This is a multicenter, randomized withdrawal, double-blind controlled study in participants with rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept plus methotrexate therapy who are in very good disease control for 6 months prior to study entry. The study will consist of a 30-day screening period, a 24-week open label run-in period, a 48-week double-blind treatment period and a 30-day safety follow-up period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

371

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1425
        • Research Site
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4000
        • Research Site
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4002
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1784
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1612
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1505
        • Research Site
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 3M7
        • Research Site
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3N 0K6
        • Research Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada, B1S 3N1
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1Y2
        • Research Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 1S6
        • Research Site
      • Rimouski, Quebec, Canada, G5L 8W1
        • Research Site
      • Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 1Y2
        • Research Site
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Research Site
      • Uherske Hradiste, Czechia, 686 01
        • Research Site
      • Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
        • Research Site
      • Cahors Cedex, France, 46005
        • Research Site
      • Montpellier cedex 05, France, 34295
        • Research Site
      • Orleans cedex 2, France, 45067
        • Research Site
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Research Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 14059
        • Research Site
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60590
        • Research Site
      • Hildesheim, Germany, 31134
        • Research Site
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Research Site
      • Püttlingen, Germany, 66346
        • Research Site
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • Research Site
      • Athens, Greece, 12462
        • Research Site
      • Athens, Greece, 14561
        • Research Site
      • Heraklion, Greece, 71110
        • Research Site
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54636
        • Research Site
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 56429
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1036
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1023
        • Research Site
      • Veszprem, Hungary, 8200
        • Research Site
      • Bari, Italy, 70124
        • Research Site
      • Catania, Italy, 95124
        • Research Site
      • Firenze, Italy, 50139
        • Research Site
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
        • Research Site
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy, 42123
        • Research Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00128
        • Research Site
      • Verona, Italy, 37126
        • Research Site
      • Chihuahua, Mexico, 31000
        • Research Site
    • Baja California Norte
      • Mexicali, Baja California Norte, Mexico, 21100
        • Research Site
    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44650
        • Research Site
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64020
        • Research Site
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-168
        • Research Site
      • Karwiany, Poland, 52-200
        • Research Site
      • Sopot, Poland, 81-759
        • Research Site
      • Stalowa Wola, Poland, 37-450
        • Research Site
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
        • Research Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-035
        • Research Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1050-034
        • Research Site
      • Ponte de Lima, Portugal, 4990-041
        • Research Site
    • Western Cape
      • Panorama, Western Cape, South Africa, 7500
        • Research Site
    • Andalucía
      • Sevilla, Andalucía, Spain, 41009
        • Research Site
    • Castilla León
      • Salamanca, Castilla León, Spain, 37007
        • Research Site
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08026
        • Research Site
    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46017
        • Research Site
    • Galicia
      • A Coruña, Galicia, Spain, 15006
        • Research Site
    • Madrid
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222
        • Research Site
    • Murcia
      • El Palmar, Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • Research Site
    • País Vasco
      • Bilbao, País Vasco, Spain, 48013
        • Research Site
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Research Site
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • Research Site
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85306
        • Research Site
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
        • Research Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85037
        • Research Site
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Escondido, California, United States, 92025
        • Research Site
      • Fontana, California, United States, 92335
        • Research Site
      • Hemet, California, United States, 92543
        • Research Site
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92646
        • Research Site
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Research Site
      • Murrieta, California, United States, 92563
        • Research Site
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Research Site
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Research Site
      • Santa Maria, California, United States, 93454-6945
        • Research Site
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Research Site
      • Tustin, California, United States, 92780
        • Research Site
      • Victorville, California, United States, 92395
        • Research Site
      • West Hills, California, United States, 91307
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Doral, Florida, United States, 33126
        • Research Site
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33309
        • Research Site
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
        • Research Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33126
        • Research Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33144
        • Research Site
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Research Site
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States, 34684
        • Research Site
      • Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32514
        • Research Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33705
        • Research Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States, 30046
        • Research Site
    • Idaho
      • Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
        • Research Site
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Blue Island, Illinois, United States, 60406
        • Research Site
      • Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60076
        • Research Site
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62703
        • Research Site
    • Indiana
      • Granger, Indiana, United States, 46530
        • Research Site
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
        • Research Site
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Wheaton, Maryland, United States, 20902
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Research Site
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Research Site
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49546
        • Research Site
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49008
        • Research Site
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
        • Research Site
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48917
        • Research Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Research Site
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65807
        • Research Site
    • New Jersey
      • Clifton, New Jersey, United States, 07012
        • Research Site
      • Freehold, New Jersey, United States, 07728
        • Research Site
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
        • Research Site
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87102
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11201
        • Research Site
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Research Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Research Site
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
        • Research Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Research Site
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Research Site
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29406
        • Research Site
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Research Site
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909-1900
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Carrollton, Texas, United States, 75007
        • Research Site
      • Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78404
        • Research Site
      • Cypress, Texas, United States, 77429
        • Research Site
      • League City, Texas, United States, 77573
        • Research Site
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75024
        • Research Site
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Research Site
      • Webster, Texas, United States, 77598
        • Research Site
    • Virginia
      • Danville, Virginia, United States, 24541
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Part 1, Run-In Period):

  • Subjects must be adults with a history of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis;
  • Subjects must be in very good rheumatoid arthritis disease control for ≥ 6 months and be in remission as defined by a Simplified Disease Activity Index ≤ 3.3 at screening and at the end of the run-in period.
  • Subjects must be on etanercept 50 mg per week plus methotrexate therapy for ≥ 6 months prior to the start of the run-in period. The methotrexate dose must be 10 to 25 mg per week for ≥ 6 months prior to the start of the run-in period and the dose must be stable for ≥ 8 weeks prior to the start of the run-in period.
  • Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis, and has a negative test for tuberculosis during screening.

Exclusion Criteria (Part 1, Run-In Period):

  • Subject has used biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug other than etanercept OR has used an oral janus kinase inhibitor ≤ 6 months prior to run-in visit 1
  • Subject has any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to run-in visit 1.
  • Subject has known alcohol addiction or dependency or uses alcohol daily.
  • Subject has one or more significant concurrent medical conditions per investigator judgment, including the following:

    • poorly controlled diabetes
    • chronic kidney disease stage IIIb, IV, or V
    • symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV)
    • myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within the past 12 months prior to randomization
    • uncontrolled hypertension
    • severe chronic pulmonary disease (eg, requiring oxygen therapy)
    • multiple sclerosis or any other demyelinating disease
    • major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than rheumatoid arthritis (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome)

Inclusion Criteria (Part 2, Treatment Period):

  • SDAI ≤ 3.3 at run-in visit 3
  • Subject if female and not at least 2 years postmenopausal or history of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, has a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline (day 1).

Exclusion Criteria (Part 2, Treatment Period):

  • Any clinically significant change in the Part 1 eligibility criteria during the run-in period
  • SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 on two consecutive visits at least two weeks apart OR SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 on two or more separate visits OR SDAI > 11 at any time during the run-in period
  • Subject has a clinically significant laboratory abnormality during run-in period which in the opinion of the investigator poses a safety risk, will prevent the subject from completing the study, or will interfere with the interpretation of the study results during the run-in period.

NOTE: Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply per protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open Label Run-In: Etanercept plus Methotrexate
Etanercept 50 mg weekly by subcutaneous injection plus oral methotrexate 10 to 25 mg weekly for 24 weeks. Participants also receive folic acid as standard of care.
etanercept for injection in pre-filled syringes
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
  • AMG916

During the open-label run-in period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg tablets.

During the double-blind treatment period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg capsules.

Folic acid 5 to 7 mg per week as per investigator judgment or according to local standard of care.
Experimental: Double-Blind Treatment: Methotrexate Monotherapy

Oral methotrexate 10 to 25 mg weekly plus placebo for etanercept for 48 weeks. Participants also receive folic acid as standard of care.

After randomization, a participant experiencing protocol-defined disease worsening will initiate rescue treatment with etanercept 50 mg QW plus methotrexate (10 to 25 mg).

etanercept for injection in pre-filled syringes
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
  • AMG916

During the open-label run-in period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg tablets.

During the double-blind treatment period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg capsules.

Folic acid 5 to 7 mg per week as per investigator judgment or according to local standard of care.
etanercept placebo for injection in pre-filled syringes
Experimental: Double-Blind Treatment: Etanercept Monotherapy

Etanercept 50 mg weekly by subcutaneous injection plus placebo for methotrexate for 48 weeks. Participants also receive folic acid as standard of care.

After randomization, a participant experiencing protocol-defined disease worsening will initiate rescue treatment with etanercept 50 mg QW plus methotrexate (10 to 25 mg).

etanercept for injection in pre-filled syringes
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
  • AMG916

During the open-label run-in period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg tablets.

During the double-blind treatment period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg capsules.

Folic acid 5 to 7 mg per week as per investigator judgment or according to local standard of care.
methotrexate placebo capsules
Experimental: Double-Blind Treatment: Etanercept plus Methotrexate

Etanercept 50 mg weekly by subcutaneous injection plus oral methotrexate 10 to 25 mg weekly for 48 weeks. Participants also receive folic acid as standard of care.

After randomization, a participant experiencing protocol-defined disease worsening will continue on the assigned treatments (as rescue treatment).

etanercept for injection in pre-filled syringes
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
  • AMG916

During the open-label run-in period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg tablets.

During the double-blind treatment period, methotrexate will be provided as 2.5 mg capsules.

Folic acid 5 to 7 mg per week as per investigator judgment or according to local standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission (≤ 3.3) at Week 48: Etanercept Monotherapy vs. Methotrexate Monotherapy
Time Frame: Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.
Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission (≤ 3.3) at Week 48: Etanercept and Methotrexate vs. Methotrexate Monotherapy
Time Frame: Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.
Week 48
SDAI Score at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Disease Activity Score (28 Joint) Calculated Using the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Formula (DAS28-ESR) at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The DAS28-ESR is a modified composite index that was designed to measure disease activity using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28-joint count, ESR in mm/hr, and a 100 mm VAS measuring the participant's general health, from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores represent higher disease activity.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The DAS28-ESR is a modified composite index that was designed to measure disease activity using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28-joint count, ESR in mm/hr, and a 100 mm VAS measuring the participant's general health, from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Disease Activity Score (28 Joint) Using the C-Reactive Protein Formula (DAS28-CRP) at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The DAS28-CRP is a composite index that was designed to measure disease activity using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28-joint count, CRP in mg/L, and a 100 mm VAS measuring the participant's general health from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores represent higher disease activity.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The DAS28-CRP is a composite index that was designed to measure disease activity using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28-joint count, CRP in mg/L, and a 100 mm VAS measuring the participant's general health from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The CDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where a higher score represents worse disease.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CDAI at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The CDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where a higher score represents worse disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission (≤ 3.3) at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Boolean Remission at All Measured Timepoints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

A participant achieves Boolean remission (66/68-joint count) if all of the following criteria are met at a single timepoint:

  • 68-joint tender joint count ≤ 1
  • 66-joint swollen joint count ≤ 1
  • CRP (mg/dL) ≤ 1
  • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS (where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 10=worst arthritis activity imaginable) ≤ 1.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Disease Worsening
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

Percentage of participants who fulfilled disease-worsening criteria for the first time is presented. Disease worsening is defined as any of the following:

  • an SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 during 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart
  • SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 on 3 or more separate visits
  • SDAI > 11 after randomization.

The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.

Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
Time to Disease Worsening
Time Frame: up to Week 48

Disease worsening is defined as any of the following:

  • an SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 during 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart
  • SDAI > 3.3 and ≤ 11 on 3 or more separate visits
  • SDAI > 11 after randomization.

The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.

up to Week 48
Time to Recapture SDAI Remission After Starting Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Between rescue and remission or Week 48, whichever comes first.

In participants who receive rescue treatment during the double-blind treatment period.

The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.

Between rescue and remission or Week 48, whichever comes first.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Rescue Treatment Who Experienced SDAI Remission at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
The SDAI is a composite score that is based on the number of tender and swollen joints using a 28-joint count, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0=no activity at all and 100=worst activity imaginable, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS where 0=no arthritis activity at all and 100=worst arthritis activity imaginable, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. SDAI remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3.3.
Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on etanercept pre-filled syringe subcutaneous injection

3
Subscribe