ReCell® Combined With Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries

February 22, 2021 updated by: Avita Medical

Demonstration of the Safety and Effectiveness of ReCell® Combined With Meshed Skin Graft for Reduction of Donor Area in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries

This is a randomized, within-subject controlled study to compare the clinical performance of the ReCell device when used as an adjunct to meshed skin graft in subjects requiring skin grafts for closure of burn injuries. Co-primary effectiveness endpoints include: (1) confirmed treatment area closure (i.e., healing) prior to or at 8 weeks as assessed by a blinded evaluator, and (2) a comparison of the actual expansion ratio, computed as the ratio of measured treated area to the measured donor site area, achieved for the ReCell-treated and control treatment areas. Safety will be evaluated in terms of long-term durability, scar outcomes and treatment-related adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
        • Arizona Burn Center at Maricopa Medical Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Washington Hospital Center
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38103-3409
        • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    • Texas
      • Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78234
        • USAISR - US Army Institute of Surgical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject requires skin grafting as a result of an acute thermal burn injury (i.e. injuries caused by exposure of the skin to fire/flames, excessive heat, hot steam or water).
  2. The area of total burn injury is 5-50% TBSA inclusive.
  3. Two areas requiring skin grafting, each at least 300cm2 (or 600cm2 contiguous), excluding hand/face and joints.
  4. The subject is at least 5 years of age.
  5. The subject (or family, for those under 18 years of age) is willing and able to complete all followup evaluations required by the study protocol.
  6. The subject is to abstain from any other treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless medically necessary.
  7. The subject agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study.
  8. The subject and/or guardian are able to read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject's burn injuries were caused by chemicals, electricity, and/or radioactive substances.
  2. The subject is unable to follow the protocol.
  3. The subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
  4. The subject has a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate for irrigation (Hartmann's) solution.
  5. Life expectancy is less than 1 year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All Participants (within patient control)
All subjects will receive both ReCell and skin graft. Each patient serves as their own control. Their study treatment area (burn injury) will be divided into Area A and Area B. Investigational treatment will be randomly allocated to either Area A or Area B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Confirmed Treatment Area Closure of RECELL-treated Wounds Compared to Control (Non-inferiority)
Time Frame: Prior to or at 8 weeks
Complete wound closure is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage, confirmed at two consecutive study visits at least 2 weeks apart by direct visualization by a qualified clinician blinded to treatment assignment. The incidence of complete wound closure is hypothesized to be non-inferior for RECELL-treated areas as compared to control areas.
Prior to or at 8 weeks
Actual Expansion Ratios (Treatment Area to Donor Site Area, Inclusive of Donor Skin Needed for Secondary Treatments)
Time Frame: Prior to or at 8 weeks
For this second co-primary endpoint, it is hypothesized that the expansion ratio associated with the RECELL treatment area will be superior to that of the control, i.e. less donor skin will be required for RECELL-treated areas compared with the control areas.
Prior to or at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observer Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( POSAS) Opinion Score
Time Frame: At 24 Week
The observer component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the blinded evaluator to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar).
At 24 Week
Patient's Satisfaction/Treatment Preference
Time Frame: At 24 Week
At 24 Week
Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Opinion Score
Time Frame: Week 24
The patient component of the Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the patient to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar). T
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James H Holmes, IV, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 21, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CTP001-6

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on ReCell Treatment

3
Subscribe