Persistency Study After aP / Tdap Booster Vaccines in Adult Subjects (V113_01 Extension 1)

February 24, 2016 updated by: Novartis

Phase 1 Extension Study to Evaluate Antibody Persistence Approximately 3 Years After Administration of Different Dosages of Acellular Pertussis or Tetanus-Diphtheria-acellular Pertussis Booster Vaccines in Healthy Adult Subjects Enrolled in Study V113_01

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persistence of immune response against the three pertussis antigens (anti- pertussis toxoid (PT), anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and anti-pertactin (PRN)) in subjects who received a booster dose of either aP or Tdap study vaccines or Boostrix® during V113_01 study.

There was only one Clinic Visit at day 1. Eligible subjects went undergo a single blood draw after which they were observed for approximately 15 minutes. Approximately 10.0 mL of blood was withdrawn.

No vaccine was administered and no safety data was collected in this study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

315

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium
        • Site 02, Center for Vaccinology (CEVAC), Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy individuals previously enrolled in V113_01 trial, who completed the study following study protocol and who received the appropriate booster vaccine per group assignment
  • Individuals who voluntarily gave written informed consent after the nature of the study was explained according to local regulatory requirements, prior to study entry
  • Individuals who could comply with study procedures including follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical conditions representing a contraindication to blood draw.
  2. Abnormal function of the immune system resulting from:

    • Clinical conditions
    • Systemic administration of corticosteroids per oral (PO)/ intravenous (IV)/ intramuscular (IM) for more than 14 consecutive days within 90 days prior to informed consent.
    • Administration of antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents or radiotherapy within 90 days prior to informed consent.
  3. Received immunoglobulins or any blood products within 180 days prior to informed consent.
  4. Received an investigational or non-registered medicinal product within 30 days prior to informed consent
  5. Study personnel as an immediate family or household member
  6. Any other clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the results of the study or pose additional risk to the subject due to participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart.

Acellular pertussis vaccine:

Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Biological: Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) To ensure all subjects receive a tetanus and diphtheria booster vaccination, an injection was administered on Study Day 30, one month after the administration of the investigational vaccine.

Experimental: Group 2
Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart.

Acellular pertussis vaccine:

Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Biological: Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) To ensure all subjects receive a tetanus and diphtheria booster vaccination, an injection was administered on Study Day 30, one month after the administration of the investigational vaccine.

Experimental: Group 3
Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart

Acellular pertussis vaccine:

Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Biological: Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) To ensure all subjects receive a tetanus and diphtheria booster vaccination, an injection was administered on Study Day 30, one month after the administration of the investigational vaccine.

Experimental: Group 4
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D (diphteria) toxoid, fixed dose of T (tetanus) toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Experimental: Group 5
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Experimental: Group 6
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Experimental: Group 7
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Experimental: Group 8
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Experimental: Group 9
Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

Active Comparator: Group 10
Subject received one dose of a licensed TdaP booster vaccine (containing 8 μg each of PT, FHA and 2.5 μg of PRN antigens and 2.5 Lf of diphtheria toxoid and 5 Lf of tetanus toxoid) followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart

Licensed TdaP booster vaccine Licenced TdaP booster vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm.

Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Antibodies in aP1, aP2, aP4 Groups Against Pertussis Antigens at Day 1.
Time Frame: Day 1

The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in aP1, aP2, aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1
Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Antibodies in T5D2aP1, T5D2aP2 and T5D2aP4 Groups Against Pertussis Antigens at Day 1.
Time Frame: Day 1

The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) in serum at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in T5D2aP1, T5D2aP2 and T5D2aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1
Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Antibodies in T5D4aP1, T5D4aP2 and T5D4aP4 Groups Against Pertussis Antigens at Day 1.
Time Frame: Day 1

The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) in serum at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in T5D4aP1, T5D4aP2 and T5D4aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1
Geometric Mean Ratios Antibodies Concentrations in aP1, aP2, aP4 Groups as Measured at V113_01E1 Day 1 vs. All V113_01 Time Points.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1

Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113_01 time points to V113_01E1 day 1.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1
Geometric Mean Ratios Antibodies Concentrations in T5D2aP1, T5D2aP2 and T5D2aP4 Groups as Measured at V113_01E1 Day 1 vs. All V113_01 Time Points.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1

Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113_01 time points to V113_01E1 day 1.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1
Geometric Mean Ratios Antibodies Concentrations in T5D4aP1, T5D4aP2 and T5D4aP4 Groups as Measured at V113_01E1 Day 1 vs. All V113_01 Time Points.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1

Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113_01 time points to V113_01E1 day 1.

Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.

Day 1, Day 8, Day 30, Day 180, Day 365 of V113_01 and Day 1 of V113_01E1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pertussis

Clinical Trials on aP booster

Subscribe