Simplified Anti-Thrombotic Therapy for FFR (SMART-FFR)

December 10, 2016 updated by: Fernando Boccalandro MD, Odessa Heart Institute

Evaluation of Simplified Anti-Thrombotic Therapy for Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve

Despite the routine use of procedural anti-coagulation and anti-platelet therapy for FFR calculation, no study has evaluated the optimal anti-thrombotic regimen in patients undergoing FFR. Therefore, the aim of the Evaluation of Simplified Anti-Thrombotic Therapy for Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve (SMART-FFR) study was to evaluate the safety of using a simplified anti-thrombotic regimen with only upstream dual anti-platelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel, compared with anticoagulation plus single- or- DAT therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis undergoing FFR calculation during elective coronary angiography.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patient regardless of sex, or age were eligible for the study if they were scheduled for an elective coronary angiography using a femoral approach, and were agreeable to participate in the study after signing informed consent, and had a coronary stenosis in any major native epicardial coronary artery between 50-70% determined by quantitative angiography that was an adequate target for FFR at the discretion of the operator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included patients requiring mandatory DAT, patient undergoing radial access due to concomitant anticoagulation, patients with contra-indications or intolerant to DAT, patients with severe left ventricular hypertrophy defined as a wall thickness greater than 14 mm by echocardiography in the septal or lateral wall, patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular function less than 30%, severe aortic valvular stenosis defined as an aortic valve area of less than 1 cm2, presenting with an acute coronary syndrome in the past two weeks, hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, reported allergy to clopidogrel, aspirin or bivalirudin, planned to be anticoagulated during or previous to the time of the coronary angiography, using Prasugrel or Ticagrelor, patients with coronary arteries unsuitable for FFR calculation due to severe tortuousity and/or calcification, lesions supplied by a bypass conduit, any mental condition rendering the subject incapable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study such that the patient is unable to give appropriate informed consent or refusal or inability to sign an informed consent .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Received upstream aspirin plus clopidogrel with no intra-procedural anticoagulation for the FFR calculation with a saline bolus and drip used for placebo anticoagulation during the procedure to blind the operator
Fractional flow reserve tracings were calculated using a Volcano pressure wire intra-coronary system after ensuring proper calibration of the aortic pressure transducer and the guidewire, using 6 Fr-guide catheters. Before crossing the stenosis, baseline pressure was measured by the guide catheter and the pressure guidewire were equalized according to the manufacturer's specifications. After advancing the pressure sensor across the stenosis, coronary hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140μg/kg/min until a steady state was reached for at least 3 minutes). Fractional flow reserve was considered positive if it was less than 0.80.
Other Names:
  • Fractional Flow Reserve
All patients received a chewable aspirin of 325 mg at least 6 hours before the procedure
All patient receiving clopidogrel, were loaded with 600 mg at least 6 hours before the procedure
Active Comparator: Group 2
Received upstream aspirin and clopidogrel plus intra-procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin for FFR calculation
Fractional flow reserve tracings were calculated using a Volcano pressure wire intra-coronary system after ensuring proper calibration of the aortic pressure transducer and the guidewire, using 6 Fr-guide catheters. Before crossing the stenosis, baseline pressure was measured by the guide catheter and the pressure guidewire were equalized according to the manufacturer's specifications. After advancing the pressure sensor across the stenosis, coronary hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140μg/kg/min until a steady state was reached for at least 3 minutes). Fractional flow reserve was considered positive if it was less than 0.80.
Other Names:
  • Fractional Flow Reserve
All patients received a chewable aspirin of 325 mg at least 6 hours before the procedure
All patient receiving clopidogrel, were loaded with 600 mg at least 6 hours before the procedure
Dosed based on the weight at 0.75 mg/kg I.V. bolus dose followed by a 1.75 mg/kg/hr I.V. infusion for the duration of the procedure
Experimental: Group 3
Received only upstream single anti-platelet therapy with aspirin plus intra-procedural anticoagulation for the FFR calculation with bivalirudin
Fractional flow reserve tracings were calculated using a Volcano pressure wire intra-coronary system after ensuring proper calibration of the aortic pressure transducer and the guidewire, using 6 Fr-guide catheters. Before crossing the stenosis, baseline pressure was measured by the guide catheter and the pressure guidewire were equalized according to the manufacturer's specifications. After advancing the pressure sensor across the stenosis, coronary hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140μg/kg/min until a steady state was reached for at least 3 minutes). Fractional flow reserve was considered positive if it was less than 0.80.
Other Names:
  • Fractional Flow Reserve
All patients received a chewable aspirin of 325 mg at least 6 hours before the procedure
Dosed based on the weight at 0.75 mg/kg I.V. bolus dose followed by a 1.75 mg/kg/hr I.V. infusion for the duration of the procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Thrombotic Complications
Time Frame: Hospital Stay and after 30 days post PCI
Hospital Stay and after 30 days post PCI

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) Major and Minor Bleeding Scores
Time Frame: Hospital Stay and after 30 days post PCI
  1. Major: Intracranial bleeding, Clinically overt signs of hemorrhage associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ≥5 g/dL or a ≥15% absolute decrease in haematocrit or Fatal bleeding.
  2. Minor: Clinically overt (including imaging), resulting in hemoglobin drop of 3 to <5 g/dL or ≥10% decrease in haematocrit. No observed blood loss: ≥4 g/dL decrease in the haemoglobin concentration or ≥12% decrease in haematocrit Any overt sign of hemorrhage that meets one of the following criteria and does not meet criteria for a major or minor bleeding event, as defined above Requiring intervention
Hospital Stay and after 30 days post PCI
Sub-clinical Ischemic Events Measured by Troponin Levels Post-procedure
Time Frame: 48 hours post procedure
48 hours post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on FFR

Subscribe