Sorting of Oral Sensations

May 11, 2015 updated by: Richard Mattes, Purdue University
Recent research indicates that fatty acids in food may have a taste. There is no lexicon to describe the sensation of the fatty acids, but participants frequently describe the sensation as bitter or sour. The proposed study will ask participants who have been screened for their ability to detect fatty acids to sort a variety of taste stimuli, including sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami, and fatty acid tastes. Observing how the participants sort the stimuli will allow us to determine if the fatty acid taste is unique from other taste sensations.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Panelists will be screened for their ability to discriminate 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion from the blank using two sequential tetrad tests. Panelists will wear nose clips during the tests. Panelists must successfully complete both tetrads in order to qualify for the study. Panelists who qualify for the full study will provide written informed consent as well as data on their ethnic background, age, and their habitual fat intake. Heights and weights will be measured.

After completing the screening tests and the demographic questions, panelists will receive 15 samples (for the first group: "All tastes sorting") or 12 samples (for the second group: "Bitters sorting"). When panelists receive the samples, they will be instructed to put on nose clips and keep the clips on for the duration of the test. Participants will be provided with water for rinsing their mouths as well as a cup to spit the samples into after tasting. Panelists will be provided with more water and additional spit cups as necessary. Next, panelists will be instructed to: "Taste each sample, spit it into the spit cup, and rinse with water. Then, sort the samples into groups you believe are similar. Groups may contain as many or as few samples as you desire. You may have as many or as few groups as you desire." Once they have decided on their groups, they will write in a description for each group and rate the group for its overall similarity. After finishing this initial sorting task, if panelists have more than two total groups, they will be instructed to select the two groups they believe are most similar to each other and combine them. If panelists still have more than two total groups, they will be instructed to combine the two most similar groups again. This will continue until panelists only have two groups remaining. At each level, panelists will rate the new, combined group for its overall similarity on a visual analog scale, as before.

Data from this sorting task will be compiled in to dissimilarity matrices for each participant, showing how many groups it took them before each sample was combined with each other sample. This data will be analyzed to determine if the fatty acid samples are similar or unique in sensation from other taste qualities.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
        • Purdue University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy men and women at least 18 years of age, not on any medication that alters taste sensation, and not allergic to dairy or nut products (samples contained a dairy protein and some sugars that were processed in facilities that also process nuts). Participants also had to pass a screening test to determine they could detect 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion compared to a blank solution.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy (self report), normal taste function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medication that alters taste sensation, failed to detect 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion, allergic to dairy or nuts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sorting all tastes
This group will receive 15 samples to taste and sort into groups. The samples included: a blank solution, hexenoic acid, decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, glucose, fructose, sodium chloride (2), citric acid, acetic acid, quinine, urea, monosodium glutamate, and inosine monophosphate.
Participants will taste a variety of food grade compounds including: hexenoic acid, decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, glucose, fructose, salt, citric acid, acetic acid, quinine, urea, caffeine, sucrose octaacetate, propylthiouracil, phenylthiocarbamide, monosodium glutamate, and inosine monophosphate.
Sorting bitter tastes
This group will receive 12 samples to taste and sort into groups. The samples included: blank solutions (2), decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, quinine (2), urea (2),caffeine, sucrose octaacetate, and propylthiouracil.
Participants will taste a variety of food grade compounds including: hexenoic acid, decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, glucose, fructose, salt, citric acid, acetic acid, quinine, urea, caffeine, sucrose octaacetate, propylthiouracil, phenylthiocarbamide, monosodium glutamate, and inosine monophosphate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Similarity of taste sensations
Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit)
Participants sort the solutions into groups, and then combine the groups based on which samples are similar in oral sensation. This is used to determine how similar or different each sample is from the others. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
1 visit (only visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of dietary fat on taste sensation sorting
Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit)
Dietary records will be used to classify participants' diets as high or low in fat. The analysis of similarity among samples will be repeated and compared between these two groups. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
1 visit (only visit)
Effect of genetic ability to taste propylthiouracil on taste sensation sorting
Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit)
Participants will be classified by their ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil (using filter papers wil phenylthiocarbamide and using data from sorting the bitter compounds). Tasters and non-tasters of this compound will be compared in their sorting of the different solutions. This will be done for the Sorting Bitter tastes group only. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
1 visit (only visit)
Effect of gender on taste sensation sorting
Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit)
Sorting patterns by males and females will be compared as well. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
1 visit (only visit)
Effect of BMI on taste sensation sorting
Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit)
Sorting patterns by lean, overweight, and obese participants will be compared as well, using the data collected on height and weight to calculate body mass index. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
1 visit (only visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 055040

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Taste Qualities

Clinical Trials on Tasting solutions

3
Subscribe