Impact of Alternative Treatment Strategies and Delivery Systems for Soil-transmitted Helminths in Kenya (TUMIKIA)

The Impact of Different Treatment Strategies on the Transmission Dynamics of Soil-transmitted Helminths: a Cluster Randomised Trial in Kenya

The mainstay of control of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is school-based deworming but recent modelling has highlights that in all but low very transmission settings, the treatment of school-aged children is unlikely to interrupt transmission, and that new treatment strategies are required. This study seeks to answer the question: is it possible to interrupt the transmission of STH and if so, what is the most cost-effective treatment strategy and delivery system to achieve this goal? In this study, two paired community cluster randomised trials in different settings in Kenya will evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of annual school-based deworming, annual community-based deworming, and biannual community-based deworming. The interventions are (i) annual mass anthelmintic treatment delivered either to pre-school and school-aged children, as part of a national school-based deworming programme, or to the entire community delivered by community health workers. The primary outcome measure is the prevalence of hookworm infection (the most common STH species), assessed by periodic cross-sectional, age-stratified parasitological surveys. Secondary outcomes include intensity of hookworm, prevalence and intensity of Ascaris lumbricoides, treatment coverage, and among a randomly selected sub-sample of participants who will be followed longitudinally, worm burden and proportion of eggs unfertilised. A nested process evaluation, using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and a stakeholder analysis will investigate the community acceptability, feasibility given the local and regional health system structures and processes, and scale-up of the interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted in two settings of Kenya that have contrasting epidemiological and programmatic characteristics, Kwale County on the south Kenyan coast and Bungoma County in western Kenya. Allocation to study group will be by cluster, using predefined units used in public health provision - termed Community Units (CUs), which comprise approximately 1,000 households or 5,000 people. CUs will be randomized to one of three groups, receiving either (i) annual school-based deworming; (ii) annual community-based deworming; (iii) biannual community-based deworming. In nine CUs, a longitudinal study will be conducted in order to better understand the transmission dynamics of STH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21761

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya, PO Box 54810-00200
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Usual resident of study community or student enrolled in study school;
  • Willingness of adult aged 18 years and above or parent/guardian to provide written informed consent;
  • Provision of written assent to participate from children aged 8 years and above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visitor to household at time of household visits;
  • Refusal of informed consent;
  • Refusal to assent by children aged 8 years and above.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Annual school-based deworming
Pre-school and school children (typically 2-14 years) will receive albendazole treatment from trained school teachers, as part of the ongoing national school-based deworming programme.
Single dose of albendazole (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • Zentel
Experimental: Annual community-based deworming
Standard school-based deworming supplemented by annual community-based deworming (2-99 years). All household members who are not enrolled in school will receive albendazole treatment from trained community health workers.
Single dose of albendazole (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • Zentel
Experimental: Biannual
Biannual school- and community-based deworming (2-99 years). All household members who are not enrolled in school will receive albendazole treatment from trained community health workers
Single dose of albendazole (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • Zentel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of hookworm in community members
Time Frame: Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention
The prevalence of hookworm will be measured in a final age-stratified, community cross-sectional survey, which will be conducted approximately 24 months after the start of the intervention. Selected individuals will be asked to provide a stool sample which will be examined in duplicate and within one hour of preparation using the Kato-Katz method. Parasite prevalence will be defined as the proportion of slides that are positive for hookworm eggs. A baseline survey will be conducted prior to implementing the intervention and an interim survey conducted at 12 months. In a random subset of individuals, additional confirmatory diagnosis of infection will be based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides in community members
Time Frame: Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention
The prevalence of Ascaris will be measured in a final age-stratified, community cross-sectional survey, which will be conducted approximately 24 months after the start of the intervention. Selected individuals will be asked to provide a stool sample which will be examined in duplicate and within one hour of preparation using the Kato-Katz method. Parasite prevalence will be defined as the proportion of slides that are positive for hookworm eggs. A baseline survey will be conducted prior to implementing the intervention and an interim survey conducted at 12 months. In a random subset of individuals, additional confirmatory diagnosis of infection will be based on real-time PCR.
Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention
Intensity of infection for each STH species
Time Frame: Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention
The intensity of STH species will be measured in a final age-stratified, community cross-sectional survey, which will be conducted approximately 24 months after the start of the intervention. Selected individuals will be asked to provide a stool sample which will be examined in duplicate and within one hour of preparation using the Kato-Katz method. Intensity of infection will be quantified as eggs per gram of faeces. A baseline survey will be conducted prior to implementing the intervention and an interim survey conducted at 12 months.
Endline survey conducted, approximately 24 months after starting the intervention
Treatment coverage
Time Frame: Up to month following treatment
• Treatment coverage will be measured using both routine data, and data collected during scheduled STH stool surveys. Teachers and community health workers (CHWs) will be provided with treatment registers and asked to provide a full record of all individuals who have received treatment. To augment these data, population-based coverage surveys using multistage clustering sampling will be carried out among a random subsample of communities.
Up to month following treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel L Pullan, PhD, London School of Hygeiene & Tropical Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Helminthiasis

Clinical Trials on albendazole

Subscribe