Safety and Efficacy of Novel Combination Regimens for Treatment of Onchocerciasis

December 4, 2023 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine
This study will investigate the safety and effectiveness of combination regimens in persons with onchocerciasis when it is administered after pre-treatment with ivermectin to clear or greatly reduce microfilariae from the skin and eyes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The open label, randomized clinical trial studies the safety and efficacy of combination regimens for the treatment of onchocerciasis. Around 300 participants from Bong Mines, Liberia will be randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups after receiving Ivermectin pre-treatment: Ivermectin plus Albendazole (IA0, Ivermectin plus DEC plus Albendazole (IDA), Moxidectin plus albendazole (MoxA), or Moxidectin plus DEC plus Albendazole (MoxDA). Participants will be treated at baseline and 6 months after initial treatment.

Safety will be measured through extensive adverse event monitoring from baseline to 6 months.

Efficacy of the treatment will be measured at 24 months after the initial treatment by the proportion of all adult female worms that are fertile in the Onchocerca nodules and the percentage of participants without microfilaremia at 6, 18, and 24 months after the first treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bong County
      • Bong Town, Bong County, Liberia
        • Bong County Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult men and women, 18 years to 75 years old
  • Participants must have at least 1 palpable subcutaneous nodule (onchocercoma)
  • Participants with mean skin Mf counts ≥ 1 Mf/mg at the time of enrollment (prior to pretreatment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of treatment with IVM or Mox less than six months prior to pretreatment with IVM.
  • Treatment with IVM or Mox outside of the study after the pre-treatment clearing dose before treatment with one of the four study treatments.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding mothers.
  • Severe ocular disease at baseline (assessed just prior to the first study treatment, approximately 6-12 months after IVM pretreatment). Briefly, these conditions include severe uveitis, severe glaucoma, severe keratitis, and/or cataracts that interfere with visualization of the posterior segment of the eye. Details regarding ocular exclusion criteria are provided below. Individuals who are excluded with significant ocular disease will be referred for appropriate All ocular disease exclusion criteria apply to either eye. That is to say, participants will be excluded if any of the ocular exclusion criteria listed below are met for either eye. These exclusions are needed to reduce the risk of study treatments worsening severe pre-existing ocular disease. They also are needed to ensure that study staff will be able to adequately evaluate the posterior segment before and after treatment.

    1. Any cataract that prevents clear visualization of fundus or imaging by OCT.
    2. Severe retinal nerve fiber layer thinning of the optic nerve in the superior and inferior quadrant analysis by OCT with a corresponding visual field defect in the superior and inferior hemifield, and/or visual field loss within 5 degrees of fixation in at least one hemifield. Note: If OCT is not available, the following exclusion criteria will apply: vertical cup/disc ratio by fundoscopy greater than or equal to 0.80 with a corresponding visual field defect in the superior and inferior hemifield, and/or visual field loss within 5 degrees of fixation in at least one hemifield.
    3. Intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than or equal to 25 by Goldmann tonometry.
    4. Retinal detachment or retinal break.
    5. Acute ocular infection (i.e., viral conjunctivitis, corneal ulcer, endophthalmitis).
    6. Optic atrophy with a reproducible visual field defect detected by confrontation visual field testing.
    7. Exam consistent with Herpes simplex virus eye infection.
    8. Homonymous hemianopsia, quadrantopsia, bitemporal hemianopsia, or central scotoma related to cerebral vascular disease by Automated Visual field testing and confrontation visual field testing.
    9. Acute angle closure glaucoma.
    10. Gonioscopy grade 0 (slit) limiting ability to safely dilate participant.
    11. Severe tremor, blepharospasm, or other voluntary or involuntary motor condition that limits careful slit lamp examinations, OCT, gonioscopy, IOP measurement, fundus photography, and automated perimetry.
    12. Cognitive impairment that limits participant's ability to understand and perform a Visual Acuity Test with a Tumbling E chart, confrontation visual field, slit lamp exam, or any other ocular exam component.
    13. Optic nerve edema.
    14. Active retinopathy or retinitis not attributable to onchocercal disease.
    15. A history of uveitis not associated with onchocerciasis.
    16. Any pre-existing chorioretinal scar or retinal degeneration and other significant retinal pathologies (foveomacular schisis, dystrophies, arterial macroaneurysms etc) involving the macula.
    17. Severe ocular pain that the participant rates as 9 or 10 out of 10.
    18. Best corrected or pinhole visual acuity worse than 6/60 (20/200).
    19. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
    20. >5 motile Mf in the anterior chamber in either eye at the time of secondary screening (6 months after pre-treatment with IVM).*
    21. The presence of one or more Mf in the posterior segment of the eye (detected by any opthalmological test performed) at the time of treatment (at least six months after pre-treatment with IVM). *Note regarding exclusion criteria t and u: The cut-off of 5 Mf in either anterior chamber was suggested by external reviewers of our proposal to the Gates Foundation. These were experts in onchocerciasis selected by the Foundation. The reviews were anonymous, so we do not know their names. They also suggested that we exclude persons with any Mf in the posterior segment of the eye, and we have added that exclusion criterion to the protocol.
  • Significant comorbidities such as renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 times the upper limit of normal), liver disease (jaundice or either AST or ALT greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal), or any other acute or chronic illness identified by study clinicians and investigators that interferes with the participant's ability to go to school or work or perform routine household chores.
  • Prior allergic or hypersensitivity reactions or intolerance to IVM, Mox, ALB, or DEC.
  • Evidence of severe or systemic comorbidities (aside from features of onchocerciasis), as judged by a study physician. Persons with baseline medical conditions that correspond to adverse event severity scores of grade 3 or higher will also be excluded.
  • Evidence of urinary tract infection as indicated by 3+ nitrites by dipstick (individuals with 1+ or 2+ nitrites will not be excluded) or underlying chronic kidney disease as indicated by 3+ protein or 3+ blood by dipstick. Persons with urinary tract infections can be enrolled after their infections are treated and cured.
  • Hgb <7 gm/dL; any such individuals will be referred to a local health center for evaluation and treatment).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ivermectin + Albendazole (IA)
Dose of oral Ivermectin (150 µg/kg) plus Albendazole (400 mg)
Participants will be given a dose of oral Ivermectin (IVM) (150 µg/kg) plus Albendazole (ALB) (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • IA
Experimental: Ivermectin + Diethylcarbamazine + Albendazole (IDA)
Dose of oral Ivermectin (150 µg/kg), Diethylcarbamazine (6 mg/kg) and Albendazole (400 mg)
Participants will be given a dose of oral Ivermectin (IVM) (150 µg/kg), Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) (6 mg/kg) and Albendazole (ALB) (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • IDA
Experimental: Moxidectin + Albendazole (MoxA)
Dose of oral Moxidectin (8mg) plus Albendazole (400 mg)
Participants will be given a dose of oral Moxidectin (Mox) (8 mg) plus Albendazole (ALB) (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • MoxA
Experimental: Moxidectin+ Diethylcarbamazine + Albendazole (MoxDA)
Dose of oral Moxidectin (8mg), Diethylcarbamazine (6 mg/kg) and Albendazole (400 mg)
Participants will be given a dose of oral Moxidectin (Mox) (8 mg), Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) (6 mg/kg) and Albendazole (ALB) (400 mg)
Other Names:
  • MoxDA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates and types of severe or serious adverse events within 6 months following Ivermectin treatments
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Rates and types of severe or serious adverse events (grade 3 or higher) occurring within 6 months following combination treatment with DEC, ivermectin, and albendazole ("IDA") vs. the comparator regimen of ivermectin plus albendazole ("IA").
Baseline to 6 months
Rates and types of severe or serious adverse events within 6 months following Moxidectin treatments
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Rates and types of severe or serious adverse events (grade 3 or higher) occurring within 6 months following combination treatment with DEC, moxidectin, and albendazole ("MoxDA") vs. the comparator regimen of moxidectin plus albendazole ("MoxA").
Baseline to 6 months
Proportion of all adult female worms that are fertile 24 months after first treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
Proportion of all adult female worms in nodules that are fertile (i.e. with morulae or later developmental stages in the uterus) 24 months after the first treatment dose. The primary objective efficacy analysis will be restricted to comparisons between IA vs IDA and between MoxA vs. MoxDA, respectively.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher by Ivermectin treatment group, that occur within 7 days of treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher by treatment group, that occur within 7 days of treatment. Comparison is made between IA vs IDA.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher by Moxidectin treatment group, that occur within 7 days of treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher by treatment group, that occur within 7 days of treatment. Comparison is made between MoxA vs MoxDA.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher in participants with ocular MF in Ivermectin treatment groups.
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher that occur within 7 days of treatment in participants with detectable intraocular microfilariae just before the study treatment.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher in participants with ocular MF in Moxidectin treatment groups.
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of adverse events grade 3 or higher that occur within 7 days of treatment in participants with detectable intraocular microfilariae just before the study treatment.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of ocular adverse events (any grade) by Ivermectin treatment group
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
To compare rates of ocular adverse events (any grade) by treatment group that occur within 7 days of treatment. Comparison is between IA vs IDA.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Rates of ocular adverse events (any grade) by Moxidectin treatment groups
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
To compare rates of ocular adverse events (any grade) by treatment group that occur within 7 days of treatment. Comparison is between MoxA vs MoxDA.
Baseline to 7 days after first treatment.
Percentage of adult female worms in nodules that are alive
Time Frame: 24 Months
Percentage of adult female worms in nodules that are alive 24 months after the first round of study treatment.
24 Months
Percentage of nodules with microfilaria in tissue
Time Frame: 24 Months
The percentage of nodules with microfilariae in nodule tissue (outside of worms)
24 Months
Percentage of nodules that do not contain living adult worms
Time Frame: 24 Months
The percentage of nodules that do not contain any living adult female worms
24 Months
Percentage of participants without microfiladermia after the first study treatment.
Time Frame: 6, 18, and 24 Months
Percentage of participants without microfiladermia at 6, 18 and 24 months after the first study treatment.
6, 18, and 24 Months
Percentage of participants with recurrence of microfilariae in the skin across treatment groups
Time Frame: 18 and 24 Months
Percentage of participants with recurrence of microfilariae in the skin at 18 and 24 months after the first study treatment (among persons who had complete Mf clearance 6 months after the first study treatment).
18 and 24 Months
Microfilariae density in the skin across treatment groups
Time Frame: 6, 8, and 24 Months
Mf density in the skin at 6, 18, and 24 months after the first study treatment.
6, 8, and 24 Months
Percentage of nodules with fully or partially calcified worms
Time Frame: 24 Months
Percentage of nodules with fully or partially calcified worms 24 months after the first round of study treatment.
24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gary Weil, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Fischer, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Kpanyen, PhD, National Public Health Institute of Liberia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Datasets used for published results will be shared publicly through the Washington University School of Medicine Becker Library so that the broader scientific community can access it. Only de-identified data will be shared publicly.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Dataset will be shared through Washington University School of Medicine Becker Library at the time of publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Onchocerciasis

Clinical Trials on Ivermectin w/ Albendazole

3
Subscribe