The Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Breathing on The Rate of Post-exercise Recovery in Patients With COPD

March 19, 2015 updated by: Khajonsak Pongpanit

The Effects of Breathing With a Positive Expiratory Pressure Device on The Rate of Post-exercise Recovery in Patients With COPD

Most daily activities involve alternating periods of exercise and rest. If recovery is slow following exercise it means that the next period of activity may be more difficult and the COPD patients becomes restricted in their daily life. Therefore, the investigators are interested to study the effectiveness and physiological effects of breathing with a PEP device during post-exercise period and hypothesize that

  1. Post-exercise breathing with PEP device will increase the rate of recovery more than breathing without PEP device.
  2. Post-exercise breathing with PEP device will not create harmful effects on cardiopulmonary function in COPD patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the 4th leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in 2012 and represents an important public health challenge that is both preventable and treatable. COPD is characterized by persistent airflow limitation that is usually progressive and associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways and the lung to noxious particles or gases.

The pathophysiological hallmark of COPD is an expiratory air flow limitation. During exercise, increasing ventilatory demands can induce premature airway closure by forced expiration leading to air trapping and further leading to lung hyperinflation. Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise contributes to increased end expiratory lung volume (EELV), reduces inspiratory capacity (IC), and increases the mechanical load on inspiratory muscles leading to dyspnea, exercise intolerance, limited physical activity, and thus to a poor quality of life in COPD patients. In addition, abnormal lung mechanical function during dynamic hyperinflation leads to increased sensation of dyspnea, which is the disparity between respiratory drive and the respiratory mechanical response. Abnormal controls of blood chemicals and of vasculature factors also aggravate the sensation of dyspnea.

The autonomic dysfunction (AD) that occurs in the patients with COPD is evident as an inability of heart rate to reach an appropriate level during exercise (chronotropic incompetence; CI). There is also a prolonged heart rate recovery (HRR) at the end of exercise which may contribute to increase dyspnea sensations and increased mortality rate in COPD.

Expiratory flow retardation when breathing with a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device is the one of various techniques to manage dyspnea in COPD. Most studies using a PEP device have focused on investigating the effects of PEP to reduce lung hyperinflation, reduce dyspnea, and increase exercise capacity. Only one study of Martin and Devenport, has examined the effects of PEP breathing during the recovery periods after exercise and found that following 6 minutes sub-maximal treadmill walking, 6 breath exhalation against a 10 cmH2O threshold PEP reduced dyspnea and increased HRR. Oxygen pulse saturation (SpO2) was also increased within 2 minutes although there was no statistical significant between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Muang Khon Kaen
      • Khon Kaen, Muang Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002
        • Recruiting
        • School of physical therapy, Faculty of Associated medical sciences, Khon Kaen University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Khajonsak Pongpanit, MSc student
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Watchara Boonsawa, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • David A. Jones, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chulee Jones, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate to severe COPD (both stages: FEV1/FVC < 70%, moderate stage: 50% ≤ FEV1 < 80% predicted, severe stage: 30% ≤ FEV1 < 50% predicted according to Global Initiative Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline
  • Free of exacerbations for more than 4 weeks (as defined by a change to pharmacological therapy, admission to hospital or ER or unscheduled clinic visit)
  • Age between 40-70 years old
  • Good communication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Musculoskeletal problems that limit mobility
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Any other comorbidities which would affect ability to undertake exercise test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEP interventon
Participants performed 6 PEP breaths using a water pressure threshold device (BreatheMAX) with expiratory load set at 5 cmH2O
BreatheMAX®, the water pressure threshold breathing device contributed in our laboratory will be used. This device is small, simple, easy to use and also inexpensive since the device is developed and manufactured in Thailand. The depth of water in the body of the device provides the flow resistance during exhalation through the inlet tube in a water cylinder.
Sham Comparator: Sham intervention
Participants performed 6 PEP breaths using a water pressure threshold device (BreatheMAX) with expiratory load set at 0 cmH2O
BreatheMAX®, the water pressure threshold breathing device contributed in our laboratory will be used. This device is small, simple, easy to use and also inexpensive since the device is developed and manufactured in Thailand. The depth of water in the body of the device provides the flow resistance during exhalation through the inlet tube in a water cylinder.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea rating (Rating of Perceived Breathlessness)
Time Frame: 5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
collect data every minute
5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxygen pulse saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: 5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
collect data every minute
5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
End tidal carbon dioxide pressure (PETCO2)
Time Frame: 5 minutes of exercise and 10 minutes of recovery periods
collect data every minute
5 minutes of exercise and 10 minutes of recovery periods
Respiratory rate (RR)
Time Frame: 5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
collect data every minute
5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
Expiratory flow rate
Time Frame: 10 minutes of recovery periods
10 minutes of recovery periods
Mouth pressure
Time Frame: 10 minutes of recovery periods
10 minutes of recovery periods
Inspiratory capacity (IC)
Time Frame: at 0th, 5th minutes of exercise
at 0th, 5th minutes of exercise
Inspiratory capacity (IC)
Time Frame: ~1st, 10th minutes of recovery periods
~1st, 10th minutes of recovery periods
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: 5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods
collect data every minute
5 minutes of exercise, 10 minutes of recovery periods

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chulee Jones, PhD, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
  • Study Chair: Watchara Boonsawat, PhD, Department of medicine, Faculty of medicine, Khon Kaen university, Thailand
  • Study Chair: David A. Jones, PhD, School of Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom
  • Principal Investigator: Khajonsak Pongpanit, MSc student, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Khon Kaen University (Other Grant/Funding Number: Khon Kaen University)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on A water pressure threshold device (BreatheMAX)

Subscribe