Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Activities of BGB-A317 in Participants With Advanced Tumors

October 18, 2021 updated by: BeiGene

A Phase 1A/1B, Open Label, Multiple Dose, Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Activities of the Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody BGB-A317 in Subjects With Advanced Tumors

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile and treatment effect of a new drug known as BGB-A317 in participants with advanced tumors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

451

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4216
        • Tasman Oncology Research Ltd
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
      • Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
        • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia
        • Monash Health
      • East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
        • Austin Health Hospital
      • Malvern, Victoria, Australia, 3144
        • Cabrini Hospital
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • Nucleus Network
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
        • Linear Clinical Research/Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3080
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 5505
        • Asan Medical Center
    • Kyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam, Kyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Grafton, New Zealand, 1023
        • Auckland City Hospital
      • Hamilton, New Zealand, 3204
        • Waikato
      • Wellington, New Zealand, 6022
        • Wellington Hospital
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
        • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
        • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 61363
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Sachin
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024-2545
        • Oncology Consultants, P.A.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must have had a histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic tumor for which no effective standard therapy was available.

    1. For Phase 1A: no specific restriction
    2. For Phase 1B: histology specified below:

    i. non-small cell lung cancer (participants with documented epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement should have been excluded) ii. ovarian cancer iii. gastric cancer iv. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, stage B not amenable to locoregional therapy or refractory to locoregional therapy, and not amenable to a curative treatment approach, and Child-Pugh A) v. head and neck squamous cell carcinoma vi. esophageal carcinoma vii. triple negative breast cancer viii. cholangiocarcinoma ix. renal cell cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, Merkel-cell carcinoma, sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Or any other solid tumors with known microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient status, such as colorectal cancer or pancreatic cancer

  2. Participants with previously treated brain metastasis (es) that were asymptomatic or radiographically/clinically stable and not requiring steroids medications for 4 weeks prior to enrollment were permitted.
  3. Participants must have had archival tumor tissues or agreed to a tumor biopsy for analysis of predictive biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). (Fresh tumor biopsies were strongly recommended at baseline for biomarker analysis in participants with readily accessible tumor lesions and who consented to the biopsies).
  4. Participants must have had measurable disease as defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor Version 1.1.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 1.
  6. Participants must have had adequate organ function as indicated by the following laboratory values:

    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500 /microliter
    • Platelets ≥ 100,000 / milliliter (mL)
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 grams/deciliter or ≥ 5.6 millimoles/liter
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) and alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase) ≤ 2.5 X ULN or ≤ 5 X ULN for participants with liver metastases
    • International normalized ratio or prothrombin time ≤ 1.5 X ULN
    • Activated partial thromboplastin time ≤ 1.5 X ULN

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of severe hypersensitivity reactions to other Monoclonal antibodies.
  2. Prior malignancy active within the previous 2 years except for tumor for which a participant was enrolled in the study, and locally curable cancers that had been apparently cured, such as basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast.
  3. Prior therapies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1.
  4. Participants who failed to meet enrollment criteria for other PD-1 or PD-L1 trials solely due to low or negative predictive biomarkers.
  5. Participants with active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases should have been excluded.
  6. Participants should have been excluded if they had a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10 milligrams daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study drug administration.
  7. Had history of interstitial lung disease or non-infectious pneumonitis except for those induced by radiation therapies.
  8. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus.
  9. Active infection requiring therapy, positive tests for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C ribonucleic acid except in participant with HCC, who met the following criteria:

    • Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load < 200 international units/mL (approximately 1000 combined positive score/mL)
    • Participants with active HBV infection needed to be on anti-HBV suppression ≥ 3 months, throughout treatment and for 6 months after
    • Participants hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive after successful treatment (defined as sustained virologic response [SVR] 12 or SVR 24) were allowed as long as 4 weeks had passed between completion of HCV therapy and start of study drug
  10. Use of any vaccines against infectious diseases (for example, influenza, varicella) within 4 weeks (28 days) of initiation of study therapy and 60 days after the last administration of the study medication.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may have applied.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BGB-A317 Phase 1A
In the dose escalation part, the dose levels were escalated following a modified 3+3 dose escalation scheme. In the scheduled exploration part, participants were assigned to doses and dose schedules. In the fixed dose exploration part, participants were assigned to dose group(s) not to exceed the maximum tolerated dose. In the dose expansion part, participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor type.
Participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor types
Experimental: BGB-A317 Phase 1B
In the dose escalation part, the dose levels were escalated following a modified 3+3 dose escalation scheme. In the scheduled exploration part, participants were assigned to doses and dose schedules. In the fixed dose exploration part, participants were assigned to dose group(s) not to exceed the maximum tolerated dose. In the dose expansion part, participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor type.
Participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor types

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1A: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of an investigational product. All AEs were monitored per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version [v] 4.03 2010).
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Values
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 15 of each cycle through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
A complete physical examination, vital signs (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate, temperature, and respiratory rate), and weight were performed pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. During the treatment period, symptom-directed physical examinations were performed. If there were no complaints and no abnormal findings from the previous visit for a particular organ system, a physical examination of that organ system was not required.
Day 1 and Day 15 of each cycle through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants Experiencing Dose-dependent Toxicity Through Ophthalmology Findings
Time Frame: Day 15 of cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2 and all additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Ophthalmological examinations (such as eyesight/visual acuity, fundoscopy, slit lamp microscopy, and optical coherence tomography [or equivalent diagnostic test]) were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. Eye exam, visual acuity test, and optical coherence tomography (or equivalent diagnostic test) will be assessed by an appropriate specialist at Screening. Participants dosed underwent subsequent ophthalmologic examinations, a specified in the protocol, by an appropriate specialist during study treatment.
Day 15 of cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2 and all additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms
Time Frame: Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and all additional cycles; Day 1 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Electrocardiograms were obtained at pre-specified time points. Significant QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) prolongation was defined as an interval ≥ 500 milliseconds (msec) or an interval which increases by ≥ 60 msec over baseline.
Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and all additional cycles; Day 1 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values
Time Frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. If warranted, additional testing was done, or the relevant tests done more frequently in accordance with institutional guidelines. All participants who had any Grade 3 or Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities at withdrawal from the study were followed up until they had returned to Grade 1 or Grade 2, unless these were not likely to improve due to the underlying disease. Participants experiencing decreases (low) and increases (high) to ≥ Grade 3 are reported.
Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants Experiencing Severe AEs
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010). In addition to performing the CTCAE assessment, the intensity of each AE and serious adverse event (SAE) recorded was assigned to one of the following categories based on the Investigator's clinical judgment: Mild: an event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; moderate: An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities; severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities. Severity was a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event and, accordingly, both AEs and SAEs could be assessed as severe.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the study whose best overall response was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by investigators based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.1.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1A: Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Within the Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) For Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) For Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Time To Maximum Concentration (Tmax) For Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Half-life (T½) For Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A - Part 3: Clearance (Cl) For Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A/1B: Number Of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)
Time Frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 15
Immunogenicity was summarized by the number and percentage of participants who developed detectable treatment-emergent ADAs, which included positive ADAs and neutralizing antibodies (NAb).
Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 15
Phase 1A: ORR
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the study whose best overall response was either CR or PR as assessed by investigators based on RECIST v 1.1.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: CR Rate
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The CR rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: PR Rate
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The PR rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Stable Disease (SD) Rate
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The SD rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study dose to disease progression or death whichever occurs first. Participants without an event (no disease progression or death) were censored at the date of "last tumor assessment". Participants with no baseline or post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at Day 1. PFS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
OS was defined as the time interval between the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death for any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS at various time points. The OS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Duration Of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
DOR for responders (CR or PR) was defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of progressive disease or death for any cause, whichever occurred earlier. For participants who were alive without progression following the qualifying response, DOR was censored on the date of last evaluable tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. The DOR was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number of Participants Experiencing AEs
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of an investigational product. All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010).
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Steady State Plasma Trough Concentration Of Tislelizumab
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 Cycle 5 and every other Cycle in the first 6 months, every 4 cycles in the next 6 months, once every 6 months up to end of treatment (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Pre-dose, Day 1 Cycle 5 and every other Cycle in the first 6 months, every 4 cycles in the next 6 months, once every 6 months up to end of treatment (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1B: PFS
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study dose to disease progression or death whichever occurs first. Participants without an event (no disease progression or death) were censored at the date of "last tumor assessment". Participants with no baseline or post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at Day 1. PFS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR, PR, and SD based on RECIST v 1.1 in participants with select tumor types.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, and durable SD [SD ≥24 weeks] based on RECIST v 1.1 in participants with select tumor types.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Values
Time Frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2; through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
A complete physical examination, vital signs (SBP, DBP, pulse rate, temperature, and respiratory rate), and weight were performed pre-specified time points for Phase 1B. During the treatment period, symptom-directed physical examinations were performed. If there were no complaints and no abnormal findings from the previous visit for a particular organ system, a physical examination of that organ system was not required.
Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2; through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants Experiencing Dose-dependent Toxicity Through Ophthalmology Findings
Time Frame: Day -28 (predose), Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Ophthalmological examinations (such as eyesight/visual acuity, fundoscopy, slit lamp microscopy, and optical coherence tomography [or equivalent diagnostic test]) were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1B. Eye exam, visual acuity test, and optical coherence tomography (or equivalent diagnostic test) will be assessed by an appropriate specialist at Screening. Participants dosed underwent subsequent ophthalmologic examinations, a specified in the protocol, by an appropriate specialist during study treatment.
Day -28 (predose), Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms
Time Frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Electrocardiograms were obtained at pre-specified time points. Significant QTc prolongation was defined as an interval ≥ 500 msec or an interval which increases by ≥ 60 msec over baseline.
Day -28 (predose), Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values
Time Frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis will be performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A and Phase 1B respectively. If warranted, additional testing was done, or the relevant tests done more frequently in accordance with institutional guidelines. All participants who had any Grade 3 or Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities at withdrawal from the study were followed up until they had returned to Grade 1 or Grade 2, unless these were not likely to improve due to the underlying disease. Participants experiencing decreases (low) and increases (high) to ≥ Grade 3 are reported.
Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants Experiencing Severe AEs
Time Frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010). In addition to performing the CTCAE assessment, the intensity of each AE and SAE recorded was assigned to one of the following categories based on the Investigator's clinical judgment: Mild: an event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; moderate: An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities; severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities. Severity was a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event and, accordingly, both AEs and SAEs could be assessed as severe.
Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BGB-A317_Study_001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Cancer

Clinical Trials on BGB-A317

3
Subscribe