Effect of Periodontitis Treatment on Quality of Life and Experiences of Fear, Anxiety and Pain

July 19, 2019 updated by: University of Taubate

Impact of Different Protocols for Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis on the Following Patient-centered Variables: Oral Health Related Quality of Life and Experiences of Fear, Anxiety and Pain: a 6 Month Randomized Clinical Trial

There are different protocols to treat gum diseases. One relevant differential aspect is related to time. There are protocols that usually takes one to two months to be completed while other are completed within 24 hours. Although both protocols seem to provide clinically similar improvements, there are some positive aspects related to the short-term one. Among them lower number of clinical sessions, easier schedule and costs advantages. However, there are many other relevant aspects that can be helpful for patients and clinicians decisions regarding type of treatment.

This study evaluates if and how clinically effective protocols used to treat periodontitis affect quality of life related to individual's oral statuses. In addition, the experiences of fear, anxiety and pain before and after these specific protocols are monitored.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Most randomized controlled clinical trials regarding the effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment have focused on objective parameters. Their effects on patient-centered variables have been received very little attention. After determining clinical therapeutic efficacy, this study compared over 6 months the effects of two different forms of non-surgical periodontal therapy - scaling and root planing per quadrant (SRP) and one-stage full-mouth disinfection (FMD) - on scores of quality of life, fear, anxiety and pain of moderate chronic periodontitis. Initially, the sample size was calculated considering protocols' clinical efficacy. Specifically for the present study it was verified if the initial sample size would be enough for analysis of the subjective variables.

Patients registered in dental care centers from University of Taubate, Taubate - Sao Paulo, Brazil and Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais, Brazil were informed about the objectives and methods of the study, being consecutively included in the study only after signing an informed consent form. Selected participants were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups by a closed envelope system. According to the designated group, participants receive either conventional quadrant scaling in four weekly sections or full-mouth scaling within 24 hours.

Two experienced trained periodontists carried out debridement procedures of both protocols with manual Gracey and McCall curettes and Hirschfield files.

Specific validated instruments were used to evaluate subjective variables. Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) and Oral Health and Quality of Life (OHQoL-UK) measured quality of life while Dental Fear Survey (DFS), Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) questionnaires and, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measured experienced fear, anxiety and pain, respectively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild to moderate chronic periodontitis
  • smokers or non-smokers
  • at least 18 natural teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • regular use or use in the previous 3 months of antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs
  • regular use (twice a day) of mouthwashes
  • sensitivity or allergy to oral hygiene products
  • patients undergoing periodontal therapy including dental scaling and root planing procedures in the 12 months preceding the start of the study
  • bifurcation or trifurcation class III lesions
  • the need for antibiotic prophylaxis for periodontal clinical examination/treatment
  • removable partial dentures, fixed or removable orthodontic devices
  • pregnancy and lactation
  • medical or psychological disorder that could affect the ability of the questionnaires' understanding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Quadrant-wise scaling
Patients underwent quadrant scaling under local anesthesia in four weekly sections.

Patients underwent quadrant scaling under local anesthesia in four weekly sections. Three experienced trained periodontists carried out debridement procedures of both protocols with manual Gracey and McCall curettes and Hirschfield files.

Oral hygiene instructions were given for all participants and oral supplies were provided for the duration of the study.

Experimental: Full-mouth 24-hour scaling
Patients underwent full-mouth scaling under local anesthesia in two sections within 24 hours.

Patients underwent full-mouth scaling under local anesthesia in two sections within 24 hours. Three experienced trained periodontists carried out debridement procedures of both protocols with manual Gracey and McCall curettes and Hirschfield files.

Oral hygiene instructions were given for all participants and oral supplies were provided for the duration of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oral health related quality of life
Time Frame: changes in OIDP and OHQoL scores from baseline to 6 months
changes in OIDP and OHQoL scores from baseline to 6 months
Scale of self-reported pain
Time Frame: changes in VAS scores from baseline to 1 month
changes in VAS scores from baseline to 1 month
Fear and anxiety
Time Frame: changes in DFS and DAS scores from baseline to 6 months
changes in DFS and DAS scores from baseline to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Periodontal pocket depth (mm) and clinical attachment level (mm) were measure at baseline and at 6 months after active periodontal treatment.
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 months
from baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 552264/2011-3
  • 521-10 (Other Identifier: Ethics committee)
  • CAAE 07172212.3.0000.514 (Other Identifier: Ethics committee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Quadrant-wise scaling

Subscribe