Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion

May 30, 2016 updated by: mohamad sayed abdellah, Assiut University

Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion in Women With Previous Caesarean Section

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used as reversible contraceptives. Both copper- and levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing IUDs (LNG-IUDs) are safe,cost-effective in the long term and equally effective compared with tubal sterilization.

In addition, the LNG-IUD (Mirena®) provides non contraceptive benefits, such as treatment for menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea and anemia. The current use of IUDs among reproductive-aged women ranges from 8 to 15% worldwide. Reported complications related to IUD insertion are 8.8% insertion failure, 2.8-11.5% cervical problems, 0.2% cervical perforation, 0.2% syncope and 5.8% expulsion. Insertion failures and cervical problems seem to occur more often among women who have never delivered vaginally.

Cervical stenosis, an immature or small cervix and a significantly ante- or retroverted position of the uterus, has been described as factors associated with a difficult sounding of the cervical canal or even failure to insert the IUD.

Misoprostol is an inexpensive prostaglandin E1-analogue, which is associated with few side effect. More over several have shown the benefit of misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in non pregnant women. Priming with misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy and dilatation and curettage (D&C) in perimenopausal women resulted in increased cervical dilatation and lower rate of cervical laceration.

The effect of misoprostol on the cellular matrix causes dissolution of collagen fiber increasing the amount of fluid in the stroma and consequentially causes cervical effacement. Fear of pain during insertion, however, might prevent some women from choosing IUD and fears of painful and/or difficult placements may lead them to recommend or counsel women on other, less effective methods.

Women's perception of pain is multifactorial and likely to be influenced by cultural differences and personal experiences; insertion-related pain is therefore difficult to predict. Nevertheless, factors associated with greater pain include nulliparity, not currently breastfeeding and longer time since last pregnancy; of these factors, nulliparity is the strongest predictor of pain.

The proportion of women of reproductive age who are nulliparous is increasing, with women delaying childbirth and having fewer children or choosing to remain childless. The proportion of Caesarean section births has also increased and women who have only ever had a Caesarean section are often viewed as nulliparous with respect to IUD placement. Anticipated pain is often greater than the actual pain experienced, and the majority of nulliparous women experience no more than moderate pain during IUD insertion. However, among nulliparous women there is a subset (about 17%) for whom the insertion of IUD is associated with severe pain.These women need effective pain relief.

For most nulliparous, nulligravid or parous women, IUD insertion can be performed successfully without cervical priming and with a minimum amount of discomfort. Whether selective use of misoprostol has a role in management of pain in certain subsets of women (e.g. nulliparous women and those in whom the insertion is non-routine/difficult) has yet to be adequately studied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Include those who delivered by CS .
  2. Who accept to participate in the study.
  3. Desire IUD placement.
  4. Negative pregnancy test.
  5. No history or current history of pelvic inflammatory disease.
  6. No current cervicitis.
  7. No contraindication to IUD insertion (less than 4 week post partum,gynecological malignancy,unexplained vaginal bleeding and pregnancy).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication to IUD .
  2. Current pregnancy.
  3. Uterine anomaly.
  4. Undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding.
  5. Allergy to misoprostol.
  6. Patients contraindicated to administration of misoprostol.
  7. Women who delivered vaginally.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Misoprostol group
Going to receive 400 µg misoprostol vaginally 3 hours before IUD insertion.
400 µg misoprostol vaginally 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Going to receive placebo.
This group will receive placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
easiness score of IUD insertion
Time Frame: 5 minutes
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the difference in the pain intensity scores between the study groups
Time Frame: 5 minutes
5 minutes
the women's level of satisfaction at the end of insertion
Time Frame: 5 minutes
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Prior to IUD Insertion

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol

Subscribe