Short-Term Response of Thoracic Spine Manipulation With or Without Trigger Point Dry Needling for Mechanical Neck Pain

January 30, 2021 updated by: Brian Young, Brooke Army Medical Center

Short-Term Response of Thoracic Spine Manipulation With or Without Trigger Point Dry Needling for Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study will assess the short term response of thoracic spinal manipulation with or without trigger point dry needling in 58 subjects with a primary complaint of mechanical neck pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neck pain is common, and return to duty rates after medical evacuation from theater for spinal pain is low. Muscles comprise the majority of the stability for the cervical spine, yet neck muscle function can be altered in the presence of pain. Research has consistently shown the benefit of including thoracic spine manipulation (SMT) in the treatment of patients with mechanical neck pain. Emerging evidence is now also showing promising benefit of including trigger point dry needling (TDN) for the treatment of mechanical neck pain. Treatment regimens commonly address anterior cervical stabilizing musculature, but little is known regarding the response to treatment of the deep posterior stabilizing musculature.

This study will assess the short term response of thoracic SMT with or without TDN in 58 subjects with a primary complaint of mechanical neck pain. Subjects will be randomized to receive 2 treatment visits approximately 2-3 days apart of either SMT+sham TDN or SMT+TDN. TDN will be directed to the upper trapezius and deep cervical extensor muscles of the neck. Outcomes of interest will be changes in function and pain. Assessments will be made at baseline, immediately after the first treatment, at the 2nd treatment, and approximately 5-7 days after the 2nd treatment visit. A subgroup of 20 subjects (10 per group) will also have the upper trapezius and deep cervical extensor muscle activation assessed via shear wave elastography, and deep cervical flexor activation assessed via the craniocervical flexion test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78234
        • AMEDD Center & School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-64 years and eligible for military health care
  2. Primary complaint of mechanical neck pain provoked by posture, movement or palpation of neck musculature, with or without unilateral upper extremity symptoms.
  3. Presence of active trigger points in either the upper trapezius or deep cervical extensor muscles.
  4. Able to make one initial appointment at the Army Medical Department Center and School at Fort Sam Houston, one treatment visit approximately 2-3 days after the initial visit, and then a final outcome visit approximately 5-7 days after 2nd visit.
  5. No less than 10 points (0-50 range) on the Neck Disability Index.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior history of whiplash injury resulting in neck pain which required medical treatment.
  2. Any prior physical therapy, chiropractic, acupuncture treatment or injections for neck pain within the past 3 months.
  3. History of cervical spine surgery.
  4. History of any systemic disorder in which thoracic spine manipulation and TDN would be contraindicated (i.e. osteoporosis, bleeding disorders or anticoagulant medication use)
  5. Signs and symptoms consistent with nerve root compression (i.e. diminished upper extremity strength, sensation or reflexes), cervical artery insufficiency (i.e. nystagmus, gait disturbances, Horner Syndrome) or upper cervical ligament instability (i.e. Sharp-Purser, alar ligament, transverse ligament tests).
  6. Current primary complaint of headaches
  7. Pending legal action regarding their neck pain
  8. Inability to read and understand English
  9. Females known or thought to be pregnant

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SMT and TDN
Thoracic spinal manipulation and trigger point dry needling using Seirin J-type stainless steel needles, 0-2-0.3 x 40-50 mm. Exercise program consists of cervical range of motion exercises and posterior neck muscle activation exercise.
All patients will receive 3 different thrust joint manipulations to the middle and upper thoracic spine region. Each technique will be applied up to 2 times, per the discretion of the treating therapist discretion
The TDN treatment will consist of a trained investigator inserting a needle through the participant's skin, into the deep cervical extensor muscles and/or the upper trapezius muscles using FDA approved (FDA regulation # 880.5580) disposable 0.2-0.3 x 40-50 mm stainless steel Seirin J-type needles (Seirin, Japan). Those subjects randomized to TDN will undergo this treatment.
The patient will be instructed to place 5 fingers along the manubrium, and to flex the neck down until the chin touches the fingers. The patient will then be instructed to rotate the head as far as comfortably possible to one side, and then to the other side for 10 repetitions to each side, 3-4 times per day. The patient will progress from 5 fingers, to 4, 3, 2 and eventually 1 finger as neck mobility improves.
The patient will be instructed to sit upright in a chair, and place 1-2 fingers over the C2 spinous process. Education to localize this landmark will be provided. The patient will then perform an isometric chin tuck exercise against the resistance they will apply at C2. This position will be held x 5 seconds and repeated 10 times, 3-4 times per day.
A trained investigator will insert the needle through the participants skin into the deep cervical extensors and/or the upper trapezius muscles. Needles are FDA approved (#880.5580)
Sham Comparator: SMT and Sham TDN
Thoracic spinal manipulation and trigger point dry needling sham. Exercise program consists of cervical range of motion exercises and posterior neck muscle activation exercise.
All patients will receive 3 different thrust joint manipulations to the middle and upper thoracic spine region. Each technique will be applied up to 2 times, per the discretion of the treating therapist discretion
The patient will be instructed to place 5 fingers along the manubrium, and to flex the neck down until the chin touches the fingers. The patient will then be instructed to rotate the head as far as comfortably possible to one side, and then to the other side for 10 repetitions to each side, 3-4 times per day. The patient will progress from 5 fingers, to 4, 3, 2 and eventually 1 finger as neck mobility improves.
The patient will be instructed to sit upright in a chair, and place 1-2 fingers over the C2 spinous process. Education to localize this landmark will be provided. The patient will then perform an isometric chin tuck exercise against the resistance they will apply at C2. This position will be held x 5 seconds and repeated 10 times, 3-4 times per day.
The sham group will receive a simulated TDN. Using a toothpick in a needle guide-tube, the investigator will tap, rest, and twist the toothpick for approximately 30 seconds in the same 2 muscles, 2 sites in each muscle. The sham treatment will not penetrate the skin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Change in NDI from baseline to 2-3 days
The NDI is a revised form of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index. It is designed to measure the activities of daily living in persons with neck pain.
Change in NDI from baseline to 2-3 days
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Change in NDI at 7-10 days
The NDI is a revised form of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index. It is designed to measure the activities of daily living in persons with neck pain.
Change in NDI at 7-10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Change in pain from baseline to 2-3 days
An 11-point NPRS will be used to measure pain intensity. The scale is anchored on the left with the phrase "No Pain" and on the right with the phrase "Worst Imaginable Pain".
Change in pain from baseline to 2-3 days
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 7-10 days
An 11-point NPRS will be used to measure pain intensity. The scale is anchored on the left with the phrase "No Pain" and on the right with the phrase "Worst Imaginable Pain".
7-10 days
Global Rate of Change (GRC)
Time Frame: 2-3 days
The GRC assesses subjective perception of overall change over time and the importance of that change. A 15-point Likert type scale ranging from -7 (very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better) will be used.
2-3 days
Global Rate of Change (GRC)
Time Frame: 7-10 days
The GRC assesses subjective perception of overall change over time and the importance of that change. A 15-point Likert type scale ranging from -7 (very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better) will be used.
7-10 days
Change in Deep cervical multifidus activation using ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE)
Time Frame: Day 1 pre and post intervention
Shear-Wave Elastography (SWE) is an evolving technology that uses advanced ultrasound imaging to quantify tissue stiffness (i.e., elasticity). This technology will be utilized to assess change in passive muscle activation response to treatment.
Day 1 pre and post intervention
Change in Deep cervical multifidus activation using ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE)
Time Frame: 7-10 days
Shear-Wave Elastography (SWE) is an evolving technology that uses advanced ultrasound imaging to quantify tissue stiffness (i.e., elasticity). This technology will be utilized to assess change in passive muscle activation response to treatment.
7-10 days
Change in Deep Neck Flexor (DNF) Activation
Time Frame: Day 1 pre and post intervention
Change in DNF muscle activation will be assessed via the chin tuck head lift test (CTHL).
Day 1 pre and post intervention
Change in Deep Neck Flexor (DNF) Activation
Time Frame: 7-10 days
Change in DNF muscle activation will be assessed via the chin tuck head lift test (CTHL).
7-10 days
Change in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) as assessed using an electronic algometer.
Time Frame: Day 1 pre and post intervention
PPT is the minimal amount of pressure that produces pain and is used to assess abnormalities in nociceptive processing or hyperalgesia.
Day 1 pre and post intervention
Change in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) as assessed using an electronic algometer.
Time Frame: 7-10 days
PPT is the minimal amount of pressure that produces pain and is used to assess abnormalities in nociceptive processing or hyperalgesia.
7-10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Boland, PT, DPT, PhD, Assistant Professor, Army-Baylor Doctoral Program in PT

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Thoracic spinal manipulation

Subscribe