Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision Toric (PhysIOL) and POD 26% Toric (PhysIOL)

May 5, 2021 updated by: Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.

Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision

The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC This study includes both eyes of 24 patients implanted with the POD 26%FineVision Toric (group 1: 12 patients) and the POD 26% Toric (group 2: 12 patients) .

The study primary goal is to compare the near visual acuity in both groups. Distance and intermediate visual acuities, defocus curve, refraction and straylight will be compared.

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pseudophakic patients implanted with one of the two IOLs

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient older than 50 years old
  • Regular corneal astigmatism >1.0 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry).
  • Regular corneal astigmatism <2.5 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry).
  • Group 1: patients after cataract surgery with Fine Vision toric implanted in both eyes
  • Group 2: patients after cataract surgery with Ankoris implanted in both eyes
  • Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

• - Irregular astigmatism

  • Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition)
  • Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g. diabetes mellitus (with retinopathy), immunocompromised, glaucoma etc…)
  • Any ocular comorbidity
  • History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures
  • Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome)
  • Pupil abnormalitis (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions)
  • IOL spherical equivalent power lower than 10 D or greater than 30D
  • Complicated surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1POD26PFT
Patients implanted with the POD 26% FineVision Toric
Posterior chamber IOL which consists in a small plastic lens with plastic side struts, called haptics, to hold the lens in place within the capsular bag inside the eye
2POD26PT
Patients implanted with the POD 26% Toric

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The visual acuity at near of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC is improved of at least LogMAR 0.2.
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary objective is to measure far and intermediate visual acuity, the refraction, centration, rotational stability and to determine the amount of photic phenomena for both IOLs: POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC and POD 26% TORIC.
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TaneriPODAYFT/PODAYT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on FineVision Toric

Subscribe