Decision Making in End of Life as Individual Preferences

March 8, 2016 updated by: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Decision Making in End of Life: Individual Preferences

It is not universal that terminally ill patients choose surrogate in the event of disagreement between the treating physician and the surrogate at the end of their lives. There are several factors that influence the terminally ill patient's decision to choose a decision maker at the end of his / life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The right of the patient to exercise autonomy, whether to accept the recommendation of physician is not lost when the patient is unable to make health related decision. This is the basis of substituted judgment. Without written advance directives, a surrogate has to be assigned using relevant state relationship hierarchy, and usually a family member serves as a surrogate when the patient no longer has capacity to make medical decisions. Several studies showed that surrogates do not predict the patients preference accurately when both are asked to respond to hypothetical questions. Patient designated hierarchy predicted the patient treatment preferences with 69% accuracy whereas legally assigned proxy was accurate in 68%. Even the prior discussion of the treatment preferences did not seem to improve the surrogate accuracy. Surrogates make errors predicting patient's preferences in different directions, as was found in several studies. Three studies have found that surrogates err by providing intervention that patients do not want, while others found no specific trends. Other studies showed physicians to be less accurate than surrogates in predicting the patient's wishes.

Some studies have shown that patients want their surrogates to make decision for them when there is disagreement between the patient's wishes and his or her surrogate. No studies have looked at patients preferences when there is conflict between the surrogate and the physician.

To choose the right surrogate is a paramount. One way to do this is to analyze the patient's trends as to 'how' and 'why' patients choose his or her surrogates. Little is known about what factors influence the patients' decisions to choose the surrogate and what would be their decision in the event of disagreement between the treating physician and the surrogate. Factors such as patient's culture, ethnic or religious background may play an important role in patients' preferences at the end of their lives.

The investigators aim to assess terminally ill patients' decision making preferences at the end of life and identify specific factors that determine their preferences.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

148

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from Oncology, Pulmonary and Heart Failure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-resectable malignancy undergoing palliative care treatment
  2. Severe end stage COPD with FEV1 < 30% and receiving home O2 for > six months
  3. End stage cardiomyopathy NYHA class III/IV, not candidate for heart transplantation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
End of life decision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DECISION MAKING IN END OF LIFE: INDIVIDUALS PREFERENCES
Time Frame: 1 year
Individual Preferences
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DECISION MAKING IN END OF LIFE: INDIVIDUALS PREFERENCES
Time Frame: 1 year
Risk factors influencing individual preferences
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 08-150

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Terminal Diseases

Subscribe