Mechanisms of Mindfulness and Stress Resilience: A Mobile App Mindfulness Training Study

May 13, 2016 updated by: Emily Lindsay, Carnegie Mellon University
The purpose of this study is to test the active components of mindfulness meditation for reducing psychological stress and improving biomarkers of health. This study compares the effects of three brief trainings: (1) training in both present-moment attention and mindful acceptance, (2) training in present-focused attention, and (3) an active psychological training with no mindfulness content.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mindfulness meditation practices are widely used among the general public, with people seeking to reduce stress, pain, inflammation, depression, and disease symptoms. Moreover, randomized controlled trials have shown mindfulness training programs to be effective in improving a broad range of psychological and physical health outcomes, particularly among populations with high stress burdens. Still, little is known about the mechanisms underlying mindfulness training that drive these effects. This study tests the active components of mindfulness that impact stress responding and health biomarkers.

The study separates attention and acceptance mindfulness instructions into three 14-day training programs delivered to a stressed adult population: (1) attention and acceptance instructions, (2) attentional monitoring instructions only, or (3) analytic thinking with no mindfulness instruction. Intervention programs are delivered on participants' own smartphones, providing a platform for maximal experimental control in testing the active ingredients of mindfulness training.

Participants are recruited from the Pittsburgh community. At a baseline laboratory session, they complete psychosocial questionnaires and tasks and provide a dried blood spot sample. On their own, they complete pre- and post-intervention Ecological Momentary Assessment measures of stress, attention, and acceptance in daily life. Between these assessments, participants have 14 days to complete their randomly assigned 14-lesson intervention program. Participants return to the lab for post-intervention assessments (questionnaires, tasks, dried blood sample), listen to a final training session from their intervention program, and complete the Trier Social Stress Test. Participants are compensated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Moderate- to high-stress (4-item Perceived Stress Scale score of 6 or higher)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of chronic mental (e.g., recurrent depression, schizophrenia, personality disorder) or physical disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, heart disease, diabetes, bleeding disorder)
  • Hospitalization in past 3 months
  • Medication use that interferes with HPA-axis activity (e.g., corticosteroids)
  • Current oral contraceptive use
  • Current antibiotic, antiviral, or antimicrobial treatment
  • Travel outside the country within the past 6 months to any country on the CDC travel alert list
  • Recreational drug use, excessive alcohol or tobacco use
  • Significant experience with or daily practice of mindfulness meditation or related mind-body practice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Mindfulness Training
14-lesson audio-guided mindfulness training program instructing present-moment attention and an orientation of acceptance
Mindfulness training intervention consisting of 14 x 20-minute audio-guided lessons that participants access on their smartphones during the 14-day intervention period.
Active Comparator: Mindful Attention Only Training
14-lesson audio-guided mindfulness training program instructing present-moment attention only
Mindful attention training intervention consisting of 14 x 20-minute audio-guided lessons that participants access on their smartphones during the 14-day intervention period.
Active Comparator: Analytic Thinking Training
14-lesson audio-guided analytic thinking program encouraging reflection on one's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, but not instructing mindfulness
Comparison analytic thinking intervention consisting of 14 x 20-minute audio-guided lessons that participants access on their smartphones during the 14-day intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily life stress assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
Inflammatory Biomarkers assessed via Dried Blood Spot
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Five Dried Blood Spot samples are obtained from participants' finger for assessment of circulating markers of inflammation (CRP, IL-6).
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Daily life state attention and acceptance assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
Subjective stress in response to social evaluative threat (TSST)
Time Frame: assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Salivary Cortisol AUC in response to social evaluative threat (TSST)
Time Frame: assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks, at time 0, and 25, 35, and 60 minutes post-TSST
assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks, at time 0, and 25, 35, and 60 minutes post-TSST
Blood Pressure reactivity to social evaluative threat (TSST)
Time Frame: assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks, at 2-minute intervals during session
assessed at post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks, at 2-minute intervals during session
Evening salivary cortisol
Time Frame: change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
Sustained attention measured by the Dichotic Listening Task
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Daily life affect assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
Daily life social interactions assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
change from baseline 3-day period to post-intervention 3-day period, which is an average of 2.5 weeks
Perceived stress measured by the PSS
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Mindfulness facets measured by the FFMQ-sf
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Mindfulness measured by the PHLMS
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Attentional control measured by the ACS
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Nonattachment measured by Nonattachment Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Subjective health measured by the SF-12
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Sleep quality measured by the PSQI-sf
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Loneliness measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Interpersonal support measured by the ISEL-12
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Social network measured by the SNI
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Depression measured by the CES-D-10
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Mind-wandering measured by the RRQ
Time Frame: change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
change from baseline to post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Treatment expectancies measured by Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
Time Frame: post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Alerting, orienting, and executive control measured by the ANT task
Time Frame: post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
post-intervention, which is an average of 3.5 weeks
Subjective responses to the training program intervention
Time Frame: composite of ratings made after each of 14 intervention lessons, an average of 2 weeks following baseline
composite of ratings made after each of 14 intervention lessons, an average of 2 weeks following baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRBSTUDY2015_00000122

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Stress

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Training

Subscribe