Dry Needling in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

August 8, 2015 updated by: Gracia Gallego Sendarrubias, European University of Madrid

Effectiveness of Dry Needling on the Upper Trapezius and the Levator Scapulae in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: Randomized Clinical Trial

The investigators study the efficacy of a combination of dry needling plus manual therapy against sham dry needling plus manual therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain. The investigators identify the most active trigger point in the upper trapezius and levator scapulae and administer two treatments, with an interval of 7 days, with a follow up 30 days after the first intervention. The primary outcome is the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain. Secondary outcomes ar pressure pain threshold, Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire and range of motion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial, designed to assess the efficacy of dry needling in the treatment of chronic neck pain. The treatment regimes simulate the standard physiotherapy administered in real clinical settings. Patients in the intervention group receive a combination of manual therapy and dry needling (40mmx0,32 guided needles). There are two control groups. In the first one, patients receive a combination of manual therapy and sham dry needling. In the second control group, patients receive no treatment in order to assess the natural history of the disease.

Patients receive two treatment sessions with an interval of 7 days and are followed up after 30 days. The primary outcome is subjective pain assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes are pressure pain threshold (assessed with a manual algometer), neck range of motion (assessed with a goniometer) and the Neck Disability Index (a standardized questionnaire). Measurements are taken pre and post-test after the first and the second treatment sessions, plus once more at the follow-up, except for the Neck Disability Index (only at the beginning and after the second treatment). In the non-treated group, patients were measured at the same time intervals.

The sample size was calculated to detect a VAS difference of 2 points, the minimally clinically important difference established in the literature. Then it was doubled in order to avoid possible dropouts. The trial takes place in a private practice in Madrid (Physios, c/Valverde 26). Patients are randomized by a computer program.

Patients are explored for active trigger points in the upper trapezius and the levator scapulae. They should meet the criteria of identification established by Travell & Simons in their Trigger point manual. The investigators also seek for trigger points following Travell & Simons' pain maps for these two muscles, where they identify five trigger point areas. The investigators select the most active, taking pressure pain threshold measurements of all the active trigger point, normalizing the values according to normal thresholds for each of the five areas in the two muscles. The normal thresholds were assessed in a pilot study with healthy patients. The investigators administer either dry or sham dry needling to the most active (the one with the lowest pain threshold) throughout the trial.

Dry needling is applied following Hong's technique with 40mmx0,32 guided needles, by a physiotherapist with 4 years of experience in the technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Neck pain for at least three months (or more)
  • An active trigger point in either the upper trapezius or the levator scapulae

Exclusion criteria

  • Treatment for neck pain within the previous six months
  • Neck Whiplash
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Infection in the area under treatment
  • Pharmacological treatment with anti-coagulants
  • Fear to needles
  • Degenerative conditions
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manual therapy + Dry needling
Manual therapy + Dry needling: 2 sessions, after a 7 days interval
Dry needling of the most active trigger point either in the upper trapezius or the levator scapulae with 40mm x 0,32mm ener-qi guided needles (EQ1132)
Standard manual therapy in the upper trapezius or the levator scapulae
Other: Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling
Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling: after a 7 days interval
Standard manual therapy in the upper trapezius or the levator scapulae
Sham Dry needling with a retractile needle (Park Sham Placebo Acupuncture Device) of the most active trigger point either in the upper trapezius or the levator scapulae
No Intervention: Untreated control
Natural history of the condition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS: 0-10) After 30 Days
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)
The Visual Analogue Scale is a validated, self-reported instrument to assess pain, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). We assess the change in chronic neck pain after 30 days, after to interventions in days 1 and 7) as compared to the baseline VAS
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pressure Pain Threshold Measured by Algometer
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)
Measured by algometer, with the standard measurement procedure
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)
Change in the Cervical Range of Motion Measured by Goniometer
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)
Measured by goniometer, with the standard measurement procedure
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)
Change in the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days)
Pre-intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • University European of Madrid

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

Subscribe