Checking Occlusion During Stainless Steel Crown Placement

May 4, 2015 updated by: Dr Sharat Pani, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

Checking Occlusion During Stainless Steel Crown Placement in Children Under General Anesthesia - Evaluation of a Novel Technique

Stainless steel crowns are arguably the most successful posterior restorations in primary teeth and have been so for more than 50 years. Stainless steel crowns offer durability and success rates in excess of 95% making them the restoration of choice for posterior primary teeth in children treated under general anesthesia.

Failures of stainless steel crowns placed on primary teeth have been documented using several criteria including marginal adaptation, recurrent caries, abscess formation or root resorption, loss of the crown due to faulty retention and even perforation of the crown . Despite the probability that factors such as root resorption and failure of endodontic treatment could be due to traumatic occlusion, surprisingly little evidence is available in literature on the attempts made to check or evaluate the occlusion of stainless steel crowns placed under general anesthesia The aim of this study was to compare the time taken for placement and the overall success of bilateral multiple stainless crowns placed under general anesthesia using an occlusal index and compare them to crowns placed without such an index, using a randomized control study design

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A total of 60 patients (32 male and 28 female) aged between 4 and 7 years (Mean age 4.8 years, SD +/- 1.09 years) who met the inclusion criteria were recruited after obtaining informed consent from the parent. No financial incentives were offered for participation in the study. A total of 51 (29 male and 22 female) patients completed the six month follow up requirement (Fig 2).

Evaluation Crowns and the Procedure All patients were evaluated at 24 hours, one week, three months and six months post-operatively. Clinical criteria evaluated included the reporting of pain, discomfort, difficulty in mastication or high points reported by the patient. Tenderness on percussion, presence of premature mobility and clinical evidence of an abscess or fistula were checked by one of the investigators (SCP). Periapical digital radiographs were taken using a digital sensor (Schick Elite, Sirona Dental Inc. Long Island NY. USA) and were evaluated by the same examiner for radiographic evidence of failure. In order to ensure blinding the investigator (SCP) recording the findings was not made aware of which group the patient belonged to. The time taken for each procedure was calculated from the time of placement of the throat pack to the time of removal of the throat pack and was obtained from the intra-operative anesthesiologist notes. If failure of the crown occurred at 3 months, these teeth were excluded from the 6 month evaluation.

Statistical Analyses The parametric values of the control and case groups were compared using the student's t test. The non-parametric values of the control and case groups were compared using the Mann Whitney U test. All tests were conducted at p value of 0.05

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 months to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Diagnosis of Severe Early Childhood Caries
  • Have behavioral problems that require management under general anesthesia
  • ASA class I
  • Deep Dental Caries involving the pulp in all eight primary molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class II or above
  • Initial treatment plan cannot be carried out
  • Need for extraction or pulpectomy in one or more primary molar

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Placement of stainless steel crown under general anesthesia without the use of an occlusal template
Placement of stainless steel crowns for teeth that have undergone pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpitis induced by severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia
Experimental: Impression
Placement of stainless steel crown under general anesthesia with the use of an occlusal template prepared after making an impression of the teeth using a fast setting polyvinyl siloxane material
Placement of stainless steel crowns for teeth that have undergone pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpitis induced by severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia
Use of an occlusal template for the placement of stainless steel crowns under general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time taken for the completion of oral rehabilitation
Time Frame: Measured at the end of the clinical procedure
Time taken for the completion of oral rehabilitation under general anesthesia
Measured at the end of the clinical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort on Biting
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Patient complains of discomfort on biting
up to 6 months
Radiographic Evidence of Abscess
Time Frame: up to 6 monhts
Presence of abcess on a periapical radiograph
up to 6 monhts
Dislodgement of crown
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Loss of retention of the crown resulting in the dislodgement or complete removal of crown
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharat C Pani, MDS, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Stainless steel crown

Subscribe