Assessment of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Involvement With UTE Pulse Sequences (MucoIRM)

November 23, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Assessment of Lung Involvement in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Using 1.5T MR Imaging With Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Pulse Sequences

Non-invasive assessment of lung involvement is a crucial issue for the follow-up of cystic fibrosis patients. Currently, CT is the method of reference to evaluate and quantify the lung morphological changes in cystic fibrosis adults but it remains a radiation-based technique. MRI with ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences is a promising non-ionizing alternative for lung imaging. The investigators' objective is to evaluate cystic fibrosis lung involvement using CT and MRI-UTE, and to test the agreement between both techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cystic fibrosis is a recessive autosomic fatal disease, affecting about 6000 people in France. Thanks to progress in symptomatic care, median survival is increasing. The lung involvement is the most common and responsible for most deaths. The evaluation of respiratory disease severity is based on pulmonary functional tests (PFT) and imaging. Multi-slice computed tomography (CT) is the method of reference to quantify lung involvement in cystic fibrosis. It detects respiratory lung involvement earlier than PFT, and it reveals lesions associated with the onset of respiratory exacerbations, the mortality increase and the reduction of quality of life. However CT provides ionizing radiation, thus limiting the possibility of long-term follow-up. MRI is a non-ionizing 3D imaging technique; nevertheless, lung MRI is technically challenging with the result that it is currently not used in routine practice. Indeed, both low proton density and susceptibility effects lead to very low signal intensity derived from lung parenchyma. Recently, pulse sequences with ultrashort echo time (UTE) have been implemented by the use of half radio-frequency excitations and radial projection reconstruction. These UTE sequences make it theoretically possible to retrieve more signal from the lung parenchyma. The investigators aim at using 3D T1-weighted UTE pulse sequences on a 1.5T magnet (Avanto dot, Siemens) in cystic fibrosis patients in order to assess lung involvement severity. Thirty three cystic fibrosis adults are expected to take part in the study. All will benefit from PFT, CT and MRI. The investigators' strategy is to establish a semi quantitative score of pulmonary severity (Helbich score) using MRI and CT in subjects, testing for correlations between MRI and CT measurements and assessing the reproducibility of lung lesions quantification using MRI. The investigators' objective is to demonstrate that MRI-UTE pulse sequence at 1.5T is accurate and reproducible in evaluating and quantifying pulmonary involvement in cystic fibrosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pessac, France
        • University Hospital Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cystic fibrosis adults
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects without any social security or health insurance
  • Pregnancy
  • MRI contraindications: Magnetically activated implanted devices (cardiac pacemakers, insulin pumps, neurostimulators, cochlear implants), metal inside the eye or the brain (aneurysm clip, ocular foreign body), cardiac valvular prosthesis (Starr-Edwards pre-6000), subject with claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement between MRI and CT for scoring lung involvement in cystic fibrosis
Time Frame: During MRI and CT, Day one

MRI and CT evaluation of lung lesions quantification in cystic fibrosis will be assessed by 2 blind radiologists.

Agreement between both evaluation will be assessed during statistical analyses after study completion.

During MRI and CT, Day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cystic fibrosis lesions scoring extracted from CT and MR images
Time Frame: During MRI and CT, Day one

MRI and CT evaluation of lung lesions quantification in cystic fibrosis will be assessed by 2 blind radiologists.

Agreement between both evaluation will be assessed during statistical analyses after study completion.

During MRI and CT, Day one
MRI cystic fibrosis reproductibility scoring over the time
Time Frame: During MRI, Day one
MRI cystic fibrosis scoring will be assessed a second time the same blind radiologist
During MRI, Day one
Correlation between MRI cystic fibrosis scoring and PFT indexes
Time Frame: Day one
Day one
Correlation between MRI cystic fibrosis scoring and exacerbation number
Time Frame: 12 month after Day one
12 month after Day one
Correlation between MRI cystic fibrosis scoring and quality of life
Time Frame: Day one and 12 month after Day one
Day one and 12 month after Day one
Evolution of MRI cystic fibrosis scoring after one year
Time Frame: 12 month after Day one
12 month after Day one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Subscribe