Corticospinal Function After Spinal Cord Injury

March 1, 2024 updated by: Monica Perez, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
The investigator's overall goal is to develop new strategies to test optimization of Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) doses to maximize strategy to restore upper and lower-limb motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The investigator proposes to use modern electrophysiological methods to enhance the efficacy of residual corticospinal connections. Defining the neural basis by which corticospinal volleys generate muscle responses will provide crucial information required to maximize residual motor output. The investigator's specific goals are to: 1) determine the temporal and spatial organization of corticospinal volleys and motor cortical representations of upper-limb muscles after incomplete cervical SCI and 2) develop methodologies to promote recovery of function. The investigator's focus on reach and grasp movements because of their importance in daily life activities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will determine the temporal organization of corticospinal volleys during reach and grasp movements. Multiple descending volleys in the corticospinal tract generate multiple peaks in muscle responses (indirect (I)-waves). I-waves are a mechanism by which corticospinal neurons are transynaptically activated at periodic intervals of ~1.5 ms. This periodic activation contributes to the recruitment of spinal motoneurons and generation of movement. we will use paired-TMS to examine I-waves in surface EMG recordings from upper-limb muscles during reach and grasp movements.

We will also identify motor cortical maps of upper-limb muscles involved in reach and grasp movements. We will use TMS guided by a frameless neuronavigation system to define the size and location of motor cortical maps of upper-limb muscles during reach and grasp movements. We will be able to determine overlaps and functional interactions between distal and proximal arm motor cortical representations. Our preliminary data shows that finger and biceps cortical maps largely overlap during reach and grasp movements in controls but considerable less in patients

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
        • Contact:
          • PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Monica A Perez, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria for individuals with SCI:

    1. Male and females between 18-85 years,
    2. Chronic SCI (≥ 6 months post injury),
    3. Cervical injury at C8 or above,
    4. Intact or impaired but not absent innervations in dermatomes C6, C7, and C8 using the American Spinal Injury Association sensory scores, and
    5. Ability to reach and grasp a small object located at least 8 cm forward, above, and laterally without leaning forward with the trunk

Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:

  1. Male and females between 18-85 years,
  2. Right handed,
  3. Ability to reach and grasp a small object located at least 8 cm forward, above, and laterally without leaning forward with the trunk

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria for individuals with SCI and Healthy Controls:

    1. Uncontrolled medical problems including pulmonary, cardiovascular or orthopedic disease
    2. Any debilitating disease prior to the SCI that caused exercise intolerance
    3. Premorbid, ongoing major depression or psychosis, altered cognitive status
    4. History of head injury or stroke
    5. Pacemaker
    6. Metal plate in skull
    7. History of seizures
    8. Receiving drugs acting primarily on the central nervous system, which lower the seizure threshold such as antipsychotic drugs (chlorpromazine, clozapine) or tricyclic antidepressants
    9. Pregnant females
    10. Ongoing cord compression or a syrinx in the spinal cord or who suffer from a spinal cord disease such as spinal stenosis, spina bifida or herniated cervical disk.
    11. History of brain tumor and or brain infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Electrophysiology Assessment of Time Domain
Assessment of electrophysiology in the time domain to examin temporal organization of corticospinal function
Kinematics, Spinal Cord Excitability and Cortical Spinal Motor Excitability.
motor task combined with real or sham stimulation
Experimental: Electrophysiology Assessment of Location
Assessment of electrophysiology to examine spatial organization of corticospinal function
motor task combined with real or sham stimulation
Kinematics, Spinal Cord Excitability and Cortical Spinal Motor Excitability
Active Comparator: Training with some stimulation
Training with non-invasive stimulation and training with sham stimulation
motor task combined with real or sham stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper-limb motor function
Time Frame: 5 months
measured by functional tests of hand/arm motor function
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortical Neurophysiological Outcome
Time Frame: 5 months
measured by the maps area and overlap in millimeters
5 months
Change in Sensorimotor Function
Time Frame: 5 months
measured by upper-limb movements scale from 1(dependent) to 7 (independent).
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Monica Perez, PT PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

May 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00210458
  • R01NS090622-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Electrophysiology Assessment of Time Domain

3
Subscribe