CTC Immune Checkpoint

July 8, 2019 updated by: Duke University

Defining the Relevant Immune Checkpoints Expressed on Metastatic Prostate Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells

This pilot study will explore the prevalence of expression of four immune checkpoint biomarkers on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from men with metastatic prostate cancer that are captured by EpCAM via the CellSearch method, and specifically defined as co expressing DAPI and cytokeratin, and lacking CD45 expression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Duke Cancer Institute Patients

Description

Patients will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:

  1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Small cell or neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate are also permitted.
  2. Clinical or radiographic evidence of progressive metastatic disease, with progression defined as a rising PSA, new metastatic lesions (bone or soft tissue), or radiographic evidence of tumor growth on CT or MRI.
  3. Age ≥ 18 years.
  4. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

In addition to meeting all of the above criteria, patients must meet all of the criteria for one of the following groups:

A) mCRPC starting sipuleucel-T (Provenge) with or without abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide

  1. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (not applicable for patients with small cell or neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate, or those receiving ADT therapy): Castrate levels of testosterone (≤ 50 ng/dl)
  2. Patient planning to start sipuleucel-T.
  3. Enrollment prior to the initiation of sipuleucel-T.

B) mCRPC with visceral or high risk disease pre-abiraterone/enzalutamide

  1. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (not applicable for patients with small cell or neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate, or those receiving ADT therapy): Castrate levels of testosterone (≤ 50 ng/dl)
  2. Visceral OR high risk disease - must meet one of the following categories:

    • Visceral disease: Radiographic evidence of liver, adrenal, pulmonary, or brain metastases
    • High risk disease: Presence of at least 2 of the following factors:

      • Bone pain requiring opioids
      • Anemia (Hgb <13 g/dL)
      • Bone scan progression at baseline
      • >2 sites of metastatic disease
      • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≤ 70
      • PSA doubling time <3 months
  3. Patient planning to start abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.
  4. Enrollment prior to the initiation of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.

C) Newly diagnosed metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) starting androgen deprivation therapy

  1. Evidence of metastatic disease on radiographic imaging
  2. Enrollment within 2 weeks of initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
  3. Lack of history of hypogonadism

D) Enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate resistant mCRPC

  1. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (not applicable for patients with small cell or neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate, or those receiving ADT therapy): Castrate levels of testosterone (≤ 50 ng/dl)
  2. Evidence of disease progression on or following enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate, as defined by one of the following:

    • Radiographic evidence of disease progression as defined by new bone scan lesions or growth of existing soft tissue/visceral/lymph node/bone metastases as determined by the investigator
    • Clinical progression of disease with cutaneous lesions or palpable lesions in absence of radiographic progression

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of intercurrent or past medical or psychiatric illness that would make participation in a blood drawing protocol difficult or not feasible at the discretion of the principal investigator or co-investigator(s).
  2. Treatment with an anthracycline (including mitoxantrone) within 1 week of CTC collection, as anthracyclines cause auto-fluorescence of cells.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group A
men with mCRPC starting sipuleucel-T (Provenge) with or without abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide will have CTC enumeration and immune checkpoint characterization at baseline, 3 months, 4-12 weeks after completion of sipuleucel-T, and at progression.
Group B
men with mCRPC with visceral or high risk disease pre-abiraterone/enzalutamide will have CTC enumeration and immune checkpoint characterization at baseline, 3 months, and progression.
Group C
men with high volume metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) starting hormonal therapy and docetaxel chemotherapy or who decline docetaxel chemotherapy will have CTC enumeration and immune checkpoint characterization at baseline, 3 months, and progression.
Group D
men with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate resistant mCRPC will have CTC enumeration and immune checkpoint characterization at baseline (i.e. progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate) and 4-12 weeks after completion of next therapy (ex. radium-223 or chemotherapy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in expression of four immune checkpoint biomarkers (PD-L1, PD-L2, B7-H3, and CTLA-4) on circulating tumor cells (CTCs).
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in expression of four immune checkpoint biomarkers (PD-L1, PD-L2, B7-H3, and CTLA-4) on circulating tumor cells (CTCs).
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 months (expected time of progression)
Baseline to 14 months (expected time of progression)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00063296

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on CTC biomarker expression prevalence

Subscribe