Glass-ionomer Cement Containing Chlorhexidine for ART

May 28, 2015 updated by: Aline R F de Castilho, University of Campinas, Brazil
This study evaluated the clinical and microbiological long-term effects of 1.25% CHX associated with GIC applied in primary molars using Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique. Randomized controlled trial was conducted on 40 children with carious lesions that received ART either with GIC containing CHX or GIC only. Survival rate of restorations was checked at 3 days, 3 months and 1 year after their placement when the unstimulated saliva samples were collected for microbiological assessment of mutans streptococci (MS) counts. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney tests (p <0.05).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ART treatment and follow-up:

Carious lesions were prepared by removing infected dentin with hand instruments. No local anesthesia was administered. Then, the cavities were filled with the press finger technique with one of the randomly selected materials: (1) GIC KetacMolar Easymix® containing 1.25% chlorhexidine digluconate (KM + CHX; n= 41 tooth surfaces) or (2) KetacMolar Easymix® as a control group (KM; n = 66 tooth surfaces). Material excess was removed using carver instrument and the restoration was coated with a layer of petroleum jelly. Multiple-surface cavities were filled after placement of plastic bands and wedges. Both molars (class I and II) and incisors were treated in this study and the same GIC were used for patients who had more than one carious teeth indicated to ART. The children underwent longitudinal clinical follow-up to assess physical condition (partial or complete fractures) of the restoration and the presence of primary or secondary caries at 7 days, 3 months and 1 year, according to ART evaluation criteria by Frencken et al. Children were encouraged and instructed on dental hygiene and received all other necessary oral care.

Microbiological assays:

Unstimulated whole saliva was collected after 7 days, 3 months and 1 year after treatment from each subject by direct expectoration into a 50-ml sterile container for 5-10 min. Pooled supragingival biofilm samples were collected from all buccal and lingual smooth surfaces, except from the interior of the cavities. In order to standardize plaque amount, a sterile plastic disposable inoculating loop with a circular opening of about 1 µL capacity was used for the collection. Collection was stopped when the opening was filled. Biofilm samples were placed immediately into a 1-ml centrifuge microtubes containing Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-Hcl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5). Collections were performed at least 1 h after feeding. Tubes were transported on ice to laboratory and processed within 2 h.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Good general health
  • At least one cavitated dentin carious lesion in primary molars or incisors that had an opening wide enough for the smallest ART excavator access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with pulpal exposure or the presence of fistula and history of pain were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ART with GIC containing 1.25% CHX
The cavities were filled with the press finger technique using GIC KetacMolar Easymix® containing 1.25% chlorhexidine digluconate (n= 41 tooth surfaces).
Carious lesions were prepared by removing infected dentin with hand instruments. No local anesthesia was administered. Then, the cavities were filled with the press finger technique using GIC KetacMolar Easymix® containing 1.25% chlorhexidine digluconate (n= 41 tooth surfaces).
Active Comparator: ART with GIC
The cavities were filled with the press finger technique using KetacMolar Easymix® (control group).
Carious lesions were prepared by removing infected dentin with hand instruments. No local anesthesia was administered. Then, the cavities were filled with the press finger technique using KetacMolar Easymix® (n = 66 tooth surfaces).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical long-term effect - Survival Rate
Time Frame: up to 1 year after restorative procedure
Randomized controlled trial was conducted on 40 children with carious lesions that received ART either with GIC containing CHX or GIC only. Survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and 1 year of their placement.
up to 1 year after restorative procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological long-term effect (microbiological assessment of mutans streptococci (MS) counts)
Time Frame: up to 1 year after restorative procedure
The unstimulated saliva samples were collected for microbiological assessment of mutans streptococci (MS) counts after 7 days, 3 months and 1 year of the dental treatment.
up to 1 year after restorative procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GICCHXART

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Subscribe