Progressive Functional Strength Training in Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy

May 20, 2016 updated by: Ozgun Kaya Kara, Hacettepe University

The Effects of Lower Limb Progressive Functional Strength Training Protocol on Body Functions and Activity in Children With Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy: a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is aimed to investigate effectiveness of progressive functional strength training protocol (functional squat system with virtual reality in leg press, plyometric exercises, exercises with Bosu ball & heel-rise exercises) on Body Functions and activity in children with unilateral spastic Cerebral Palsy (CP) by applying current guidelines. According to literature, there are studies that investigate the effects of functional strength training in children with CP. But there is no randomized controlled trial, explore the effects of progressive functional strength training protocol on body functions and activity on unilateral spastic CP. Hypothesis of this study is that progressive functional strength training protocol improves performance-related physical fitness, gross motor function, dynamic, balance, muscle tone and muscle strength in unilateral spastic CP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy (CP) describes a group of disorders in the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitations, which are attributed to non-progressive disturbances that occurred in the developing brain. It is the most common cause of movement disability in childhood. Children with CP may experience a variety of impaired muscle functions, such as spasticity, muscle weakness, and loss of selective motor control. Muscle structural changes are caused to activate of mechanisms that are limited function with growing and maturation. The weakness found in children with CP is attributable to both altered neural mechanisms and muscle tissue changes. Several factors affect the level of weakness found in the muscles of children with CP. First, weakness may differ between proximal and distal limb muscles. Stackhouse et al. found that the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was more impaired in the plantar flexors than the quadriceps of children with mild CP compared with controls. Second, the peak torque may vary according to the velocity of limb movement. Peak torque of the knee flexors and extensors in 24 children with CP was found to decrease with increasing velocity on an isokinetic machine. Third, peak torque may vary according to muscle length. An isokinetic study of 44 children and young people with CP found that peak torque in the hip abductors occurred when the muscle was in a lengthened position with the leg still in adduction. Fourth, the type of contraction was found to consistently affect the peak torque in both children with CP and those who are typically developing, with eccentric force being greater than concentric force in the same muscle. Although all impaired muscle functions limit the performance of daily life activities and participation in a child with CP, a recent study has shown that muscle weakness showed a stronger association with mobility limitations in children with CP than spasticity. Strength training for these children is, therefore, expected to improve or maintain their strength and functional performance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 7 years and 16 years;
  • classified in levels I of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • able to follow and accept verbal instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any orthopaedic surgery or botulinum toxin injection in the past 6 months,
  • children whose parents refused to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: control group
traditional physiotherapy (stretching, normal range of movement, walking)
We are applying routine traditional physiotherapy consisted of neurodevelopmental treatment (stretching, weight bearing, functional reaching & walking so on).
Active Comparator: intervention group
progressive functional strength training protocol on lower extremities consisted of functional squat system with virtual reality in leg press, plyometric exercises, exercises with Bosu ball & heel-rise exercises.
Participants allocated to the experimental group completed three times a week, 12-week progressive resistance training protocol. This protocol consisted of functional squat system with virtual reality in leg press, plyometric exercises, exercises with Bosu ball & heel-rise exercises. This intensity of training is approximately equal to training at an intensity of 60% to 80% of one-repetition maximum according to "National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA)" protocols. Intensity of exercise is gradually increased 10% bi-weekly.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
muscle strength
Time Frame: change from basaline muscle strenght of lower extremities at 12 weeks
8 channels Biopac® surface electromyography data acquisition and analysis systems for root mean square of maximum voluntary contraction, hand-held dynamometer "Power track II commander" for isometric muscle strength and functional squat rehabilitation system with leg press for one-maximum repetition was used to evaluate muscle strength.
change from basaline muscle strenght of lower extremities at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
gross motor function
Time Frame: change from basaline gross motor funciton at 12 weeks
Gross motor function will be assessed using dimensions D and E of the Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM), which consists of standing, and walking, running, and jumping. 10-metre walking and 1-minute walking will be evaluated function.
change from basaline gross motor funciton at 12 weeks
muscle tone
Time Frame: change from basaline muscle tone at 12 weeks
modified Tardieu scale was used to evaluate muscle tone.
change from basaline muscle tone at 12 weeks
balance
Time Frame: change from basaline balance at 12 week
Dynamic balance was assessed with Time up & go and functional reaching test.
change from basaline balance at 12 week
functional muscle strength
Time Frame: change from basaline funcitonal muscle strenght at 12 weeks
The 30s Repetition Maximum test was used to assess functional muscle strength of the lower extremities. The three closed kinetic chain exercises of lateral step-up test, sit to stand, and attain stand through half knee were used.
change from basaline funcitonal muscle strenght at 12 weeks
muscle performance
Time Frame: change from basaline muscle performance at 12 weeks
Standing Broad Jump and vertical jump was used to evaluate muscle performance.
change from basaline muscle performance at 12 weeks
power
Time Frame: change from basaline short-term muscle power at 12 weeks
Short-term muscle power was evaluated using the mean power and peak power obtained from the Muscle Power Sprint Test.
change from basaline short-term muscle power at 12 weeks
Agility
Time Frame: change from basaline agility at 12 weeks
Agility was measured via using the 10x5m sprint test.
change from basaline agility at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ozgun Kaya Kara, PhD, Hacettepe University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on traditional physiotherapy

Subscribe