Evaluation of the Usefulness of a PRN Regimen Using Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

August 17, 2019 updated by: Yuichiro Ogura, Nagoya City University

Evaluation of Visual Acuity Improvement of a PRN Regimen Using Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Due to Ischemic and Non- Ischemic Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) during the first 6 month had great effect for macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion (BVO) both in visual and anatomical outcome. It is expected that similar results could be obtained by less frequent IVR. The purpose of this study is to investigate if IVR by PRN is as effective as by monthly. In addition, the investigators are going to study the relationship between macular edema and the size and location of retinal non-perfusion area.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It was demonstrated in BRAVO study that IVR had great effect for macular edema with BVO both in visual and anatomical outcome. However IVR was done monthly for all patients (except Sham group) during the first 6 months in BRAVO study. It is expected that similar results could be obtained by less frequent IVR, and if so, it will contribute to reduce patient's burden and medical cost. Thus it is necessary to determine the optimal regimen of IVR therapy.

In this study, considering the medical and social circumstances in Japan, the investigators are going to investigate if IVR by PRN is as effective as BRAVO study.In addition, the investigators are going to study the relationship between macular edema and the size and location of retinal non-perfusion area (NPA), because VEGF is thought to be released from non-perfused retinal tissue, and VEGF production may be correlated with NPA size and location. The investigators are going to measure the size of NPA semi-quantatively by ultra wide field fluorescein angiography (UWFA) using Optos 200Tx. Then the relationship with macular edema will be studied. The effect of ranibizumab to NPA is controversial. In this study, it will be investigated, too.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 467-8602
        • Nagoya City Univsersity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent form
  • Macula edema secondary to BRVO
  • BCVA of 77 to 20 letters assessed with the use of ETDRS charts
  • CRT ≧250μm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with anti-VEGF drugs or corticosteroid or grid laser photocoagulation (study eye)
  • History of vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or other surgical intervention for RVO
  • Ocular disorders in the study eye that may confound interpretation of study results
  • BCVA over 77 letters between screening and Day 0
  • The pregnant or lactating woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intraviteal Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Intraviteal injection of 0.5mg ranibizumab
Other Names:
  • Lucentis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Visual acuity
Time Frame: One years
One years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
central foveal thickness
Time Frame: One and two years
One and two years
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Two years
Two years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
size and location of retinal non-perfusion area
Time Frame: one and two years
one and two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab

Subscribe