Evaluation of Transcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Prevention of Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (TRIVASOSTIM)

November 7, 2019 updated by: Poitiers University Hospital

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Prevention of Cerebral Vasospasm and Its Consequences After Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Due to Ruptured Aneurysm: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind Study

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) secondary to ruptured aneurysm represents 5 to 15% of all cases of stroke. The mortality rate of SAH is 40% and the risk of serious neurological sequelae among survivors is 10 to 20%.The causes of morbidity and mortality are mainly related to the initial damage induced by SAH and delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI), which is generally secondary to cerebral vasospasm.

Cerebral vasospasm is one of the main factors of poor prognosis after SAH, as it is associated with a 1.5- to 3-fold increase in the mortality rate during the 2 weeks following SAH in these patients.

Despite a significant improvement in the time to management of this disease and the fact that the ruptured aneurysm is very often rapidly excluded by surgical or endovascular intervention, patients who survive the initial SAH remain at risk of severe complications over the following 2 weeks.

Vascular stenosis of an arterial segment, called cerebral vasospasm, is observed in more than 70 to 95% of cases on digital subtraction angiography between the 7th and 14th days after ruptured aneurysm. This angiographic vasospasm can be responsible for cerebral infarction in 52 to 81% of cases.

Despite 50 years of research, no clearly demonstrated effective treatment for vasospasm is currently available.

This is a multicentre, randomized, comparative study, including 364 patients during the acute phase following ruptured aneurysm, in whom management is very often limited to control of complications, after exclusion of the aneurysm.

The objective of this study is to validate the efficacy of transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation for the prevention of vasospasm and limitation of the consequences of delayed cerebral ischaemia after SAH.

This is an innovative project, as it comprises intervention in these patients prior to the development of complications and could limit the development of these complications. The prevention tool, based on external facial nerve stimulation, is a totally innovative, reversible and noninvasive technique. Use of nerve stimulation in this indication has never been previously reported and could radically modify the intensive care management of this disease over the years to come.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • BATAILLE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years.
  • Admission within 48 h after onset of SAH.
  • Ruptured cerebral aneurysm confirmed on CT angiography or cerebral angiography.
  • Patient classified as grade I-IV according to the WFNS (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons) classification.
  • Covered by French national health insurance.
  • Absence of active cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years and > 75 years.
  • Absence of signature of the informed consent form by the patient or a close relative.
  • Person subject to reinforced protection Clinical state on admission classified as WFNS grade V (excessively high mortality rate).
  • Intracerebral or intraventricular haemorrhage without subarachnoid involvement.
  • Major complication during the aneurysm exclusion procedure.
  • SAH with no demonstrated aneurysm.
  • Presence of non-ruptured cerebral aneurysm.
  • Contraindication to placement of a transcutaneous device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: active Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Arm A, treated by active stimulation of the trigeminovascular system after placement of the TENS device.
All patients will undergo placement of a facial transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) device, but device activation will be randomized [active stimulation vs non-active (placebo) stimulation], for an initial period of 10 days.
Sham Comparator: sham Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Arm B, treated by non-active (sham) stimulation after placement of the TENS device. This absence of stimulation corresponds to the standard of care currently received by patients hospitalized for SAH due to ruptured aneurysm.
All patients will undergo placement of a facial transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) device, but device activation will be randomized [active stimulation vs non-active (placebo) stimulation], for an initial period of 10 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Development of cerebral Infarction on MRI (FLAIR sequence)
Time Frame: At 3 months
At 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Functional disability (modified Rankin scale and GOS).
Time Frame: At 6 months
At 6 months
Evaluation of quality of life (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: At 6 months
At 6 months
An anomaly of perfusion detected on perfusion CT-scan
Time Frame: At day 6
At day 6
Evaluation of MTT (Mean Transit Time)
Time Frame: At day 6
At day 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benoit BATAILLE, Poitiers university hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

3
Subscribe