A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) (EPIC)

July 24, 2018 updated by: Achaogen, Inc.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Plazomicin Compared With Meropenem Followed by Optional Oral Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI), Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP), in Adults

This was a randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of plazomicin compared with meropenem followed by optional oral (PO) therapy in the treatment of cUTI, including AP, in adults.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

609

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pyuria
  • Have a pretreatment baseline urine culture obtained within 36 hours before the start of administration of the first dose of study drug
  • Clinical signs and/or symptoms of acute pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infection
  • Normal renal function or moderate renal impairment

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed fungal urinary tract infection at the time of randomization
  • Known urinary tract infection or colonization with Gram-positive pathogens
  • Current cUTI or AP is known to be caused by a pathogen resistant to meropenem
  • Female participants of childbearing potential if they are known to be pregnant or have a positive pregnancy test at screening, breastfeeding, or unable or unwilling to use a highly effective method of birth control during the study and for at least 30 days following the last dose of study medication
  • Any rapidly progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness
  • Documented presence of immunodeficiency or an immunocompromised condition
  • Documented or known history of otologic surgery or disease including use of hearing aid, head injury leading to otologic damage, Ménière's disease, tumor of the head, neck, or auditory system, perilymphatic fistula, or autoimmune disease of the inner ear, or family history of hearing loss (excluding age-related hearing loss [onset after age of 65 years])

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plazomicin
Patients received 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) plazomicin as an intravenous (IV) infusion once daily followed by matching placebo infusions 8 and 16 hours later. After a minimum of 4 days of IV plazomicin, patients could switch to 250 or 500 mg oral levofloxacin for a total duration of 7 to 10 days (IV plus oral).
Active Comparator: Meropenem
Patients received 1.0 g meropenem as an IV infusion every 8 hours (q8h). After a minimum of 4 days of IV meropenem, patients could switch to 250 or 500 mg oral levofloxacin for a total duration of 7 to 10 days (IV plus oral).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Composite of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Cure in the Microbiological Modified ITT (mMITT) Population at Day 5
Time Frame: Day 5
Microbiological eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed the pathogen found at baseline at ≥10^5 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL. Clinical Cure at Day 5: marked improvement evidenced by complete resolution or return to premorbid levels or reduction in severity of all core baseline symptoms with worsening of none, and no new symptoms developed. Failure: Lack of improvement in core baseline symptoms of cUTI or development of new core symptoms of cUTI; adverse event (AE) requiring the discontinuation of study drug and the patient required alternative non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI. Indeterminate: Insufficient data are available to allow an evaluation of clinical outcome for any reason.
Day 5
Percentage of Patients With Composite of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Cure in the mMITT Population at Test of Cure (TOC)
Time Frame: Day 17 TOC Visit
Microbiological eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed the pathogen found at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL. Clinical Cure at TOC Visit: the complete resolution or return to premorbid levels of core symptoms of cUTI and no new symptoms develop, and no use of non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI. Failure: Persistence of one or more core symptom of infection or reappearance of or development of new core symptoms that require alternative non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI. Indeterminate: Insufficient data are available to allow an evaluation of clinical outcome for any reason.
Day 17 TOC Visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Composite of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Cure in the ME Population at Day 5
Time Frame: Day 5
Microbiological eradication: urine culture showed the pathogen found at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL. Clinical Cure Day 5: Marked improvement defined as complete resolution or return to premorbid levels or reduction in severity of all core baseline symptoms with worsening of none, and no new symptoms develop. Failure Day 5: Lack of improvement in core baseline symptoms of cUTI or development of new core symptoms of cUTI; AE requiring the discontinuation of study drug and the patient required alternative non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI.
Day 5
Percentage of Patients With Composite of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Cure in the ME Population at TOC
Time Frame: Day 17 TOC Visit
Microbiological eradication: urine culture showed the pathogen found at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL. Clinical Cure TOC: Complete resolution or return to premorbid levels of core symptoms of cUTI and no new symptoms develop, and no use of non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI. Failure TOC: Persistence of one or more core symptom of infection or reappearance of or development of new core symptoms that require alternative non-study antibiotic therapy for the current cUTI.
Day 17 TOC Visit
Percentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Day 32
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered to be drug related. An AE (also referred to as an adverse experience) can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, and it does not imply any judgment about causality. Adverse events also include the exacerbation or worsening of a condition present at screening other than the index infection for which the patient was enrolled in the study. A TEAE is any AE that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug.
Up to Day 32
Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24h)
Time Frame: Day 3
PK blood samples were collected on Day 3 (plus or minus 1 day) of study drug administration for the determination of plazomicin concentrations in plazomicin-treated patients.
Day 3
Plasma PK: Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Day 3
PK blood samples were collected on Day 3 (plus or minus 1 day) of study drug administration for the determination of plazomicin concentrations in plazomicin-treated patients.
Day 3
Plasma PK: Minimum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmin)
Time Frame: Day 3
PK blood samples were collected on Day 3 (plus or minus 1 day) of study drug administration for the determination of plazomicin concentrations in plazomicin-treated patients.
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lynn E Connolly, MD, PhD, Achaogen, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pyelonephritis

Clinical Trials on plazomicin

3
Subscribe