A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

August 20, 2018 updated by: Achaogen, Inc.

A Double-blind, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of ACHN-490 Injection Administered IV in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections or Acute Pyelonephritis

This was a multi-center, multi-national, double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled study of plazomicin administered intravenously compared with levofloxacin, a standard approved intravenous therapy for complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented or suspected cUTI/AP with clinical signs and symptoms
  • Normal kidney function defined as creatinine clearance (CLcr) of ≥60mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute bacterial prostatis, orchitis, epididymitis, or chronic bacterial prostatis
  • Gross heanaturia requiring intervention other than study drug
  • Urinary tract surgery within 7 days of randomization or during the study period
  • A known nonrenal source of infection diagnosed within 7 days of randomization
  • A corrected QT interval > 440 msec
  • History of hearing loss with onset before the age of 40 years, sensorineural hearing loss, or family history of hearing loss
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: plazomicin (10 mg/kg)
Patients received two intravenous (IV) infusions daily for 5 consecutive days: 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) plazomicin followed by placebo.
Experimental: plazomicin (15 mg/kg)
Patients received two IV infusions daily for 5 consecutive days: 15 mg/kg plazomicin followed by placebo.
Active Comparator: levofloxacin
Patients received two IV infusions daily for 5 consecutive days: placebo followed by 750 milligrams (mg) levofloxacin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 colony forming unit(s) per milliliter (CFU/mL) were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time Frame: Day 1 to the end of study (Day 40)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered to be drug related. An AE (also referred to as an adverse experience) can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, and it does not imply any judgment about causality. Adverse events also include the exacerbation or worsening of a condition present at screening other than the index infection for which the patient was enrolled in the study. A TEAE is any AE that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug.
Day 1 to the end of study (Day 40)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at TOC Visit in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)

Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the TOC visit.

The sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.

Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the TOC Visit in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)

Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as a resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the TOC visit.

The sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.

Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)

Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as a resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the EOT visit.

The Sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.

Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the EOT visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the MITT Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the EOT visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to EOT (Day 5)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population by Baseline Pathogen
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population Stratified by Infection Category
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population by Country/Region
Time Frame: Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10^5 CFU/mL were reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL.
Day 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Time (Days) to Resolution of Signs and Symptoms of cUTI and AP in the MITT Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)
Resolution of clinical signs and symptoms is defined as absence of all signs and symptoms present at baseline.
Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)
Time (Days) to Clinical Cure Based on Investigator's and Sponsor's Assessments in the MITT Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)

Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as a resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the TOC visit.

The Sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.

Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)
Time (Days) to Defervescense in the MITT Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)
Defervescence is defined as the absence of fever <37.7 degrees Celsius and is assessed in patients who were afebrile at baseline.
Day 1 to End of Study (Day 40)
Percentage of Patients Experiencing a Clinical Relapse or Microbiological Recurrence in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to LTFU (Day 40)
Patients who had a clinical relapse (defined as the return of clinical signs and symptoms requiring antibiotic therapy) or microbiological recurrence (defined as eradication of the original pathogen[s] at the TOC visit but regrowth at the level >10^5 CFU/mL by the LTFU [long term follow up] visit).
Day 1 to LTFU (Day 40)
Percentage of Patients With a Superinfection or New Infection in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 1 to to End of Study (Day 40)
Superinfections are defined as a pathogen other than the one at baseline found in urine at ≥10^5 CFU/mL any time after the first infusion through EOT. New infections are defined as a pathogen other than the one at baseline found in urine at ≥10^5 CFU/mL any time after EOT.
Day 1 to to End of Study (Day 40)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Director, Achaogen, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 13, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pyelonephritis

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe