IV or IV/PO Omadacycline vs. IV/PO Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Pyelonephritis

July 2, 2020 updated by: Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Adaptive Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iv or iv/po Omadacycline and iv/po Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Adults With Acute Pyelonephritis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (iv) or iv/per oral (po) omadacycline as compared to iv or iv/po levofloxacin in the treatment of female adults with acute pyelonephritis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a randomized (1:1:1:1:1), double-blind, double-dummy, adaptive designed, Phase 2 study. Based on review of the efficacy and microbiology data, the DMC modified the randomization algorithm, and no further participants were enrolled in the following treatment arms after May 2019: the omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv, omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv, and omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv arms. After this change, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv or levofloxacin arms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

201

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Site 201
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Site 202
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Site 203
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Site 204
      • Daugavpils, Latvia
        • Site 301
      • Liepāja, Latvia, LV-3414
        • Site 304
      • Riga, Latvia
        • Site 302
      • Rēzekne, Latvia
        • Site 305
      • Valmiera, Latvia
        • Site 303
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660062
        • Site 409
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 141435
        • Site 408
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, Moscow
        • Site 410
      • Penza, Russian Federation, 440026
        • Site 415
      • Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344022
        • Site 407
      • Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344037
        • Site 405
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194291
        • Site 411
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195067
        • Site 406
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196247
        • Site 402
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • Site 412
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197374
        • Site 403
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 198205
        • Site 414
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 198412
        • Site 401
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199106
        • Site 404
      • Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214018
        • Site 413
      • Chernivtsi, Ukraine, 58001
        • Site 502
      • Dnipro, Ukraine, 49005
        • Site 506
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61037
        • Site 505
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 2660
        • Site 504
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 4053
        • Site 503
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79059
        • Site 501
      • Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, 69600
        • Site 507

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female participants, age 18-65 years who have signed the informed consent form
  • Must have a qualifying acute pyelonephritis
  • Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug
  • Must be able to comply with all of the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Symptoms of acute pyelonephritis present for longer 7 days prior to randomization
  • Infections that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days
  • Evidence of suspected non-renal source of infections, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Evidence of liver impairment or disease
  • Evidence of unstable cardiac disease
  • Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis
  • Evidence of septic shock
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to levofloxacin
  • Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
  • Participants who are pregnant or nursing
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv
On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams intravenously (iv). On Days 2 through 7, participants continued to receive omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.
po tablets
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
iv solution
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
Experimental: Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv
On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.
po tablets
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
iv solution
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
Experimental: Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv
On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 300 milligrams per oral (po). All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
po tablets
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
iv solution
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
Experimental: Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv
On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 450 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
po tablets
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
iv solution
Other Names:
  • Nuzyra
Active Comparator: Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
On Day 1, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv or levofloxacin 750 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
iv solution/po tablets
Other Names:
  • Levaquin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: up to approximately 28 days
An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study drug or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the initiation of the study drug.
up to approximately 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pyelonephritis

Clinical Trials on Omadacycline

3
Subscribe