Gaze Modification Strategies for Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

March 3, 2020 updated by: Frederick Shic, Yale University
This project seeks to understand how the gaze behavior of infants and children with or at high risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be manipulated in the contexts of dynamic social and non-social scenes. The study explores not only the methods which may be most effective in aligning and teaching normative patterns of scene exploration, but also seeks to establish what behavioral characteristics may be most predictive of atypical scanning and atypical learning.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study initiates a highly novel line of research which uses adaptive, gaze-contingent, eye-tracking technology to help infants and children with or at high risk for ASD learn to direct their attention to people and their actions in a more typical fashion. This study will begin with a Normative Collection phase, and will conclude with a Gaze-Shaping phase. In the Normative Collection phase, the investigators will examine the gaze behavior of a group of typically developing infants and children with typical development (TD), in order to establish a normative gaze pattern. In the Gaze-Shaping phase, within the same videos shown in the Normative Collection phase, the investigators will highlight selectively targeted people, objects, and activities, in an attempt to shape participants' viewing patterns to match the normative gaze pattern.

Manual coding of live-action interaction probes will provide an additional evaluative measure, allowing the investigators to track real-world (live-action) correlates alongside video-eye-tracking behaviors. In addition, live-action probes may allow the investigators to check for generalization to live interaction with another person (as opposed to gaze behavior when watching videos). In live-action probes, one or two clinical research staff member(s) will interact with each participant (or with each other in front of the participant), in a manner analogous to the actions performed in the training videos.

Please note: The original estimated enrollment as specified to and funded by NIH was 98 participants, but was incorrectly listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as 220 participants reflecting maximal recruitment in this and other ongoing studies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale Child Study Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 18 and 60 months
  • Fulfill criteria for autistic disorder or PDD-NOS (Pervasive Developmental Disorder- Not Otherwise Specified) on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - Module 1
  • A diagnosis of autism or PDD-NOS by experienced clinicians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age below 32 weeks
  • Suspected or diagnosed hearing loss or visual impairment
  • History of head trauma with loss of consciousness
  • Non-febrile seizure disorders
  • Diagnosed neurological abnormality significantly impacting on visual or auditory acuity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gaze Contingent
Participants will view social videos using Gaze-contingent eye-tracking technology . If the participants looking patterns deviate from a normative pattern, they will be redirected to the normative point of regard using gaze-contingent cues.
When participants look away from a prototypical or expected norm, their gaze patterns are redirected to those prototypical locations.
No Intervention: Control Condition
Participants will view unaltered social videos which do not change based on where the participant is looking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gaze behavior during eye tracking tasks measured by standard eye-tracking analysis protocols
Time Frame: 1-7 days
Outcome measures for eye-tracking will include the Percentage of Time Spent Looking at Face, Body, and Background regions for stimuli involving people, and Percentage of Time Spent Looking at Activity, People, and Background regions. Percentage of time spent looking at the video (i.e. overall attention less motion, blinks, and inattention) will be calculated. Additional variables specific to the training sessions' adaptive cue condition will include the number of times the stimuli is adapted to redirect attention to locations consistent with the typical viewing pattern) and the amount of time spent in redirection. These will all be assessed by standard eye-tracking analysis protocols.
1-7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavior during real-world interactions measured by coding of video recordings
Time Frame: 1-7 days
Outcome measures include attention to social interactions and responses bids for engagement in social attention during a live experimental session, as measured by coding of video recordings.
1-7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederick Shic, Ph.D., Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Gaze-contingent eye-tracking technology

Subscribe