Patient Decision Aid for Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy

October 20, 2021 updated by: King's College London

Patient Decision Aid (PDA) for Antidepressant Use In Pregnancy: a Pilot RCT

The proposed study is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an electronic patient decision aid (PDA) for antidepressant use in pregnancy. The overall aim of this pilot RCT is to establish the feasibility of future large international RCT of the PDA's effectiveness.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depression in pregnancy is common, affecting up to 10% of women and represents serious risk to mother and infant. Unfortunately, antidepressant medication, a first-line treatment for depression in pregnancy, also comes with risks, making this a complex decision. Clinical care appears to be insufficient for ensuring that women make decisions that are consistent with their own values and with which they feel satisfied. Patient decision support tools can address such barriers. Canadian colleagues have created a patient decision aid (PDA) that has the potential to improve the decision-making process for women regarding antidepressant use in pregnancy in conjunction with clinical care. This study is a pilot RCT of the above PDA in London, to be conducted in parallel with a pilot RCT in Toronto.The overall objective of this project is to inform the development of a larger, international RCT to assess the efficacy of this PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy. To achieve this objective, the investigators will assess the feasibility of the trial protocol to evaluate the PDA and determine the preliminary effect size for a larger multisite efficacy study. The primary outcome for this pilot study is the feasibility of conducting a large randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the PDA. This includes feasibility (how well the trial protocol can be implemented), acceptability (usability and tolerability of the intervention) and adherence (the degree to which the trial protocol is followed). It is hypothesized that the protocol will be feasible, that the PDA will have a high degree of acceptability, and that adherence to the protocol will be high.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 8AF
        • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Women who meet all of the following criteria:

  • Are aged over 18
  • Are planning a pregnancy or are <30 weeks pregnant at enrolment
  • Have been offered to start or continue an antidepressant as treatment for depression by their clinician a
  • Have moderate-to-high decisional conflict (score of >25 on the Decisional Conflict Scale)

EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Women who meet any of the following criteria:

  • Have had alcohol or drug abuse or dependence in the previous 12 months
  • Have active suicidal ideation or psychosis
  • Are incapable of consenting to participation
  • Have any major obstetric complications or foetal cardiac anomaly in the current or in a past pregnancy,
  • Are visually impaired
  • Do not have sufficient English language proficiency to use the PDA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Standard Resource Sheet
Women allocated to the control intervention will login to the study website and receive a printable PDF containing references to standard published information on antidepressant use in pregnancy. This ensures women have access to accurate information on the benefits and risks of antidepressant medication in pregnancy (even though they will not receive the PDA).
Women allocated to the control intervention will login to the study website and receive a printable PDF containing references to standard published information on antidepressant use in pregnancy. This ensures women have access to accurate information on the benefits and risks of antidepressant medication in pregnancy (even though they will not receive the PDA).
Active Comparator: Electronic Patient Decision Aid

The electronic Patient Decision Aid (PDA) is an interactive website with 3 main sections:

  1. Evidence-based information on (a) depression in pregnancy, (b) each treatment option and procedure;
  2. (a) Evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both untreated depression and antidepressant treatment, (b) exercises to help women determine which risks and benefits are most important to them; and
  3. A summary section that outlines the information reviewed and which benefits and risks they deemed most important.

At the end of the PDA, women allocated to this intervention will ALSO receive the standard resource sheet which is being used as the placebo comparator.

The electronic Patient Decision Aid (PDA) is an interactive website with 3 main sections:

  1. Evidence-based information on (a) depression in pregnancy, (b) each treatment option and procedure;
  2. (a) Evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both untreated depression and antidepressant treatment, (b) exercises to help women determine which risks and benefits are most important to them; and
  3. A summary section that outlines the information reviewed and which benefits and risks they deemed most important.

At the end of the PDA, women allocated to this intervention will ALSO receive the standard resource sheet which is being used as the placebo comparator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Feasibility, measured by 'Recruitment Rate'
Time Frame: Up to one year from when the study starts enrolling participants
Up to one year from when the study starts enrolling participants

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression, measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Time Frame: (a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
(a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
Anxiety, measured by the Spielburg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: (a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
(a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
Decisional conflict, measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-randomization) and 4 Weeks post-randomization
Baseline (pre-randomization) and 4 Weeks post-randomization
Knowledge about antidepressant treatment in pregnancy
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-randomization) and 4 Weeks post-randomization
Baseline (pre-randomization) and 4 Weeks post-randomization
Intervention acceptability to patients, measured by the PDA Acceptability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 Weeks post-randomization]
4 Weeks post-randomization]
Intervention acceptability to clinicians, measured by the Provider Perspective Survey
Time Frame: After follow-up data is complete (12 weeks postpartum if last patient was recruited in pregnancy, or 6 months after baseline interview if last patient was recruited when planning a pregnancy)
After follow-up data is complete (12 weeks postpartum if last patient was recruited in pregnancy, or 6 months after baseline interview if last patient was recruited when planning a pregnancy)
Treatment Decision(s)
Time Frame: (a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
(a) Baseline (pre-randomization) and (b) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (c) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
Feasibility, measure by 'Time between recruitment to first log-in to the study website'
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-randomization
4 weeks post-randomization
Feasibility, measured by 'Study Website Usage'
Time Frame: 4 Weeks post-randomization
Composite measure comprised of: (1) number of participants who complete the PDA, (2)length of time required to complete the PDA, (3) number of log ins, (4) number of times the PDA is completed per participant, (5) total number of webpages viewed).
4 Weeks post-randomization
Feasibility, measured by 'Number of participants who follow-up with their physician during the intended timeline'
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-randomization
4 weeks post-randomization
Feasibility, measured by 'The rate of follow-up data collection'
Time Frame: (a) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (b) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)
(a) 4 Weeks post-randomization and (b) 12 weeks postpartum (for participants who enrolled while pregnant) OR 6 months post-randomization (for women who enrolled while planning a pregnancy)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Louise M Howard, PhD, Section of Women's Mental Health, King's College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRAS project ID 166207
  • R&D2015/044 (Other Identifier: South London and Maudsley / IOP Office)
  • REC reference 15/LO/0601 (Other Identifier: RES Committee London - Queen Square)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Standard Resource Sheet

Subscribe