Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Asian Elderly' Mental Health (HTRCT)

May 6, 2016 updated by: Roger Ho Chun Man, National University of Singapore

Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Asian Elderly' Mental Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to determine whether horticultural therapy would improve the psychological well-being of the older adults. 70 healthy elderly were randomized into the active horticultural therapy or the waitlist control group. Sessions will be conducted weekly for 12 weeks, and monthly for 3 months. Participants would be assessed at 3 time-points: at the start, at 3-months and at 6-months.

It was hypothesized that as compared to the waitlist control group, participants in the active horticultural therapy will have (1) lower depression and anxiety symptomatology; (2) higher life satisfaction; (3) feel more socially connected; and (4) improved cognitive functioning.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants Study participants are community-dwelling elderly.

Assessments Demographic data will be collected at the start. Psychological tests for depression, anxiety and psychological well-being as well as neuropsychological tests of cognitive functioning will be done at the start, at 3-months and at 6-months. Blood samples will also be collected at all three time points.

Intervention Sessions This is an intervention study with a waitlist control group design. The strength of this design is its experimental nature with randomization.

The Horticultural Therapy intervention is delivered by a trained practitioner at various locations and consists of 1 hour sessions weekly for first 3 months, followed by monthly session for the next 3 months. The extension of monthly sessions for 3 months is to determine sustainability and longer-term changes. The intervention is designed to cultivate an interest in gardening and promote relaxation. This will be achieved in stages, facilitated by trained volunteers and practitioners. The plant would be selected based on subjects' profiles e.g. familiarity, preference, safety and its maintenance would be followed up every fortnight. Park venues were selected based on patients profiles and park features e.g. familiarity, comfort under weather, safety.

The control group will be placed on a waiting list and only be contacted for assessments. They will receive intervention after the active treatment group at a later date.

The horticultural therapy is conducted solely for the purpose of this research.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 460077
        • Training and Research Academy; Jurong Point Shopping Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Community-living elderly aged between 60 to 85 years AND
  2. able to provide informed consent AND
  3. function independently AND
  4. With a minimum score of 22 and above on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Those who do not meet the above inclusion criteria (ie. Do not have a MCI diagnosis),
  2. Does not have a minimum score of 22 and above on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment OR
  3. Currently suffering from or have history of severe medical conditions e.g. cancer, stroke, Parkinson disease OR
  4. History of severe psychiatric conditions e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder OR
  5. Dementia OR
  6. Undergoing another therapy at the same time OR
  7. Significant visual or hearing impairment OR
  8. Marked upper and lower limb motor difficulties, which may affect their ability to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Horticultural Therapy
15 sessions of Horticultural Therapy program teaching the elderly about gardening techniques and for them to benefit from the therapeutic effects of the parks
The Horticultural Therapy intervention consists of 1 hour sessions weekly for first 3 months, followed by monthly session for the next 3 months. They will be taught on the basic gardening techniques such as sowing, weeding and fertilization during the hands-on sessions. They will also be taken on walks to the various parks to enjoy the therapeutic effect of the park greenery
Other: Waitlist Control Group
Participants will receive the same horticultural therapy program at the end of the assessments
The Horticultural Therapy intervention consists of 1 hour sessions weekly for first 3 months, followed by monthly session for the next 3 months. They will be taught on the basic gardening techniques such as sowing, weeding and fertilization during the hands-on sessions. They will also be taken on walks to the various parks to enjoy the therapeutic effect of the park greenery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
The SDS (Zung, 1965) is a 20-item quantitative measurement of symptoms of depression. Participants rate each item regarding how they felt during the week preceding using a 4-point scale that ranges from 1 (a little of the time) to 4 (most of the time). A total raw score computed by summing the scores on the individual items will be converted into a percentage (the SDS index); the higher the SDS index, the greater the severity of depressive symptoms. Several studies have established the SDS as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring depressive symptoms (Biggs et al., 1978; Gabrys and Peters, 1985; Agrell and Dehlin, 1989).
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
The SAS (Zung, 1971) will be used to measure anxiety of the participants in the preceding week. It is a 20-item self-report assessment designed to measure anxiety levels, based on cognitive, autonomic, motor and central nervous system symptoms. Each question is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4 (a little of the time) to (most of the time). Some questions are negatively worded to avoid the problem of set response. Overall assessment is done by total score. The total raw scores range from 20-80. The raw score then needs to be converted to an "Anxiety Index" score; the higher the SAS index, the greater the severity of depressive symptoms.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
The Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff and Singer, 1998) is an 18-item questionnaire which reflects the six areas of psychological well-being: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Respondents rate statements on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 6 indicating strong agreement.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin, 1985) will be administered. SWLS is a 5-item scale designed to measure global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction (not a measure of either positive or negative affect). It is a psychometrically sound measure (Larson, Diener and Emmons, 1985) and has been validated in a geriatric population (Diener et al., 1985). Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with each of the 5 items using a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores were computed by summing the scores on the individual items and ranged from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher level of satisfaction with life.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Friendship Scale (FS) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Social connectedness scale will be measured using the Friendship Scale (Hawthorne, 2006). It is a 6-item questionnaire that measures both social isolation and social connectedness. Participants were asked to rate the frequency in which each statement describes them during the past four weeks on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (almost always) to 5 (not at all). Total scores were computed by summing the scores on the individual items and ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher level of social connectedness. The Friendship Scale was developed as a short, user-friendly, stand alone scale measuring perceived social isolation. It was validated with older adults with excellent internal structures, reliability and validity (Hawthorne, 2006; Hawthorne, 2008).
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Interleukin 6 (IL-6) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Cortisol at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
10ml of fasting blood will be collected using CPT tube
baseline, 3-months, 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Nasreddine, Phillips, Bedirian, Charbonneau, Whitehead, Collin, et al., 2005) will be administered by trained research assistants and/or research nurses as global measures of cognitive function.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR ) is a 5-point scale used to characterize six domains of cognitive and functional performance applicable to Alzheimer disease and related dementias: Memory, Orientation, Judgment & Problem Solving, Community Affairs, Home & Hobbies, and Personal Care.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) evaluates declarative verbal learning and memory.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Digit Span Task at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Digit Span Task, which consists of a Digit Span Forward (DSF) and a Digit Span Backward (DSB) task is used to assess attention and verbal working memory.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Colour Trails Tests (CTT) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Colour Trails Tests (CTT) 1 and 2 assesses sustained attention and sequencing.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Block Design at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Block Design is a subtest that is administered as part of several of the Wechsler Intelligence tests, and it primarily measures visual-spatial and organizational processing abilities, as well as non-verbal problem-solving skills.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from baseline Semantic Verbal Fluency at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Semantic Verbal Fluency taps lexical knowledge and semantic memory organization.
baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Change from Basic Health Screen (composite) at 3-months and 6-months
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Blood pressure, Pulse rate, Height and Weight will be measured
baseline, 3-months, 6-months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Their social, demographic, and lifestyle data (i.e. how often they usually visit the parks or do gardening) will only be collected at baseline. This is the same for the participants' medical conditions.
Baseline
Feedback questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Feedback questionnaire will be conducted to convey participants' subjective experience and thereby expanding our understanding of the impact of the horticultural therapy intervention. The survey will ask participants to identify what was the most helpful part of the class, what suggestions they have for improvement, and whether they had continued gardening and/or visiting the parks. This brief survey will only be administered once during the post-intervention assessment. Participants' responses will be informally tallied and listed in categories.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roger CM Ho, FRCP, National University of Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mood (Psychological Function)

Clinical Trials on Horticultural Therapy

Subscribe