How to Avoid Cervical Stenosis After LEEP in High Grade Cervical Dysplasia? (DUDA)

January 14, 2020 updated by: Barretos Cancer Hospital

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Quality of Life of a New Device to Prevent Cervical Stenosis After LEEP in High Grade Cervical Dysplasia

Cervical stenosis may occur in up to 19% after conization. It is a cause of infertility and amenorrhea. This study will test a new device named DUDA Device ("Dispositivo Uterino para dilatar canal endocervical") placed just after the conization, in order to evaluate the safety, efficacy and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This device has the potential to improve outcomes by means of a significant stenosis reduction and maintain patency of the endocervical canal to view the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix during follow-up of this patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

265

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 14784400
        • Barretos Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High Grade Cervical Dysplasia, Grades 2 and 3, in the biopsy cervical
  • Patient eligible for conization
  • Patient must consent for the appropriate surgery
  • Patient must have Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status of 0, 1
  • Patients must have signed an approved informed consent and authorization permitting release of personal health information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous conization
  • limited comprehension of the study
  • the risk of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, III or IV
  • HIV or immunodepression
  • Patients with a history of the invasive malignancies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DUDA device

The number of patients to be recruited in this arm will be 145. Note: The first twenty-five patients who will be included in the study will be allocated in the intervention arm to safety analysis (phase 1); after that all eligible candidates will be randomized 1:1 (phase 2).

Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) followed by implantation of the device called DUDA (plastic device developed in barretos cancer hospital that will be placed after conization. It has 2.5 cm in length and 5mm in diameter and remains within the endocervical canal for 30 days and is set at 4 points with nonabsorbable sutures in the ectocervix.)

Insertion DUDA device
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Active Comparator: Control group

The number of patients to be recruited in this arm will be 120.

Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) without DUDA device

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety (two adverse events Grade 3 or 4 (CTCAE v. 4.0) or a single adverse event Grade 5)
Time Frame: 3 months
The main safety events to be considered in this analysis are vaginal bleeding and uterine infection. The device is considered unsafe and consequently disrupted the study if a two adverse events Grade 3 or 4 (CTCAE v. 4.0) or a single adverse event Grade 5 related to the procedure/device happens during the phase 1.
3 months
Cervical stenosis
Time Frame: 6 months

Stenosis of the endocervical canal (early and late) will be assessed by clinical information and physical examination at each visit to the hospital after surgery. The participant will be asked about the menstrual flow and dysmenorrhea during history taking. On physical examination, after the visualization of the cervix through the speculum examination, the doctor will check the channel permeability introducing a hysterometer through it. The difficulty of introducing the hysterometer 2.5mm the channel will be scored according to the following scale:

Possible passage of hysterometer? () No difficulty () Little difficult, however possible passage of hysterometer () Unable to pass

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scales
Time Frame: 6 months
The quality of life will be evaluated through questionnaires by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cervix Cancer (FACT-Cx) and the universal pain assessment tools that include international scale and pain visual analogue (EVA), numerical visual pain scale (EVN) and faces pain scales (EF).
6 months
Complications
Time Frame: 30 days
It will be evaluated during the following returns and described as any event related directly to the use of DUDA device as metrorrhagia and uterine infection.
30 days
View of the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix
Time Frame: 6 months
It will be assessed during the examination of colposcopy
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ricardo Reis, PHD, Director of the Teaching and Research Institute - Barretos Cancer Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stenosis Cervix

Clinical Trials on DUDA device

3
Subscribe