Clinical Pregnancies After Cryopreservation of Donor Oocytes With an Open or Closed Device

January 10, 2022 updated by: Neelke De Munck, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Investigation of the Clinical Pregnancies Obtained After Cryopreservation of Donor Oocytes With an Open or Closed Device

This randomized pilot study will assess if there is a difference in clinical pregnancies using donor oocytes cryopreserved in either a closed or a semi-closed vitrification device.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Oocyte cryopreservation was optimized by the use of a new technique: vitrification. Vitrification can be performed using either open devices (where the oocytes are in direct contact with the liquid nitrogen) or closed systems (where the oocytes are never in contact with liquid nitrogen). Previous studies have associated the use of open devices to higher oocyte survival rates and better embryo development. However, any beneficial effect on clinical pregnancy rates is yet to be proven. Hence, the objective of this study is to compare the clinical pregnancy rates of open and closed oocyte vitrification devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1090
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 47 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • this is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Hence, all consenting oocyte recipients will be eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women who do not consent or that cannot comprehend the investigational nature of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: closed device
Standard cryopreservation system.
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a lower cooling rate)
Other Names:
  • CBSvit closed vitrification device (CryoBioSystems vitrification device)
Active Comparator: open device
New cryopreservation system.
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a very high cooling rate)
Other Names:
  • Cryotop open vitrification device (Kitazato)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical pregnancy
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Pregnancy determined by ultrasound
7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
survival
Time Frame: 1 week
oocyte survival post-warming based on the morphological appearance of the oocytes immediately after warming: degenerated oocytes are non-surviving oocytes; oocytes with a normal morphological appearance are surviving oocytes
1 week
fertilization
Time Frame: 1 week
oocyte fertilization post-insemination: the day after oocyte insemination fertilization is checked: if one male and one female pronucleus appear, the oocyte is fertilized. if both nuclei are not present or more nuclei are present, the oocyte is considered not fertilized.
1 week
embryo development
Time Frame: 2 weeks
embryo development post-fertilization: on day 3 of pre-implantation development, the embryo is scored for the number of cells, fragmentation, appearance of nuclei and other embryological parameters: based on these parameters, an embryological score is given to the embryo. On day 5 of development (blastocyst stage) another score is given to the embryo based on the appearance of the trophectoderm and inner cell mass cells.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neelke De Munck, MSc., Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016/245

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on CBSvit device

3
Subscribe