Speed of Injection and Pain During Routine Infant Vaccinations

July 22, 2015 updated by: Anna Taddio, University of Toronto

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Injection Technique for Infant Vaccination

Vaccine injections are a significant source of pain for infants. Altering the injection speed when administering vaccines may be an effective intervention and is feasible (cost neutral). At present, there are no data regarding impact of injection speed on vaccine injection pain in infants. The aim of this study is to address this knowledge gap and to compare the impact of slow and fast vaccine injection speeds on pain during routine infant vaccinations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To date, there has been no evidence-based guidance regarding the rate at which vaccines should be injected to minimize pain. This has led to a disparity in practice. Some vaccinators favour a slow rate of injection (around 8-10 sec/mL) while others prefer a more rapid rate of injection (around 2-4 sec/mL).The slow injection method leads to a longer needle dwelling time with the increased possibility of the needle moving around and causing pain by damaging muscle tissue. Rapid injection, on the other hand, may lead to a sudden distension of muscle tissue, which itself could be painful. Allowing the muscle sufficient time to distend in order to accommodate the vaccine might minimize pain. This study will address the identified knowledge gap by comparing pain in infants undergoing routine vaccinations with a fast vs. slow injection speed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy 2 and 4 month old infants receiving their primary vaccine injections, PediacelTM (0.5mL) and PrevnarTM (0.5mL) (in conjunction with and preceded by oral RotarixTM vaccine) and healthy 6 month old infants receiving their routine vaccine injection, PediacelTM (0.5mL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with impaired neurological development; history of seizures; administration of sedatives or narcotics in the preceding 24 hours; parental inability to use study tools; parent vaccine refusal; prior participation in the trial; and refusal to be video recorded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fast injection
Vaccine injections will be given at a rate of approximately 2-4 ml/sec by the immunizer
Active Comparator: Slow injection
Vaccine injections will be given at a rate of approximately 10 ml/sec by the immunizer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infant Behavioural Pain Score
Time Frame: up to 1 minute post-vaccinations
Assessed using the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (0-10) from videotapes of the procedure
up to 1 minute post-vaccinations

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infant Parent-rated Pain Score
Time Frame: up to 2 minutes
Assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) by parent in real time
up to 2 minutes
Infant Cry duration
Time Frame: up to 2 minutes
Assessed in 1 minute intervals for 2 minutes following vaccinations from videotapes
up to 2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Taddio, PhD, University of Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Management

Clinical Trials on Fast injection speed by immunizer

Subscribe