Subcutaneous Wound Infiltration of Ketamine or Bupivacaine Pain Perception After Cesarean Section

August 3, 2015 updated by: Huseyin Aksoy

Subcutaneous Wound Infiltration of Ketamine is Superior to Bupivacaine in Terms of Pain Perception and Opioid Consumption After Cesarean Section: a Double-blinded Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial.

Aim: To assess the analgesic efficacy of subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine, either alone or as an adjuvant to bupivacaine, following CS and to compare their effects on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption.

Methods: Included patients were allocated to four treatment groups using computer-generated randomization number chart as follows; Group 1 (Ketamine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine, Group 2 (Bupivacaine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of bupivacaine 0.5%, Group 3 (Ketamine+Bupivacaine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine+bupivacaine 0.5% and Group 4 (Placebo, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of placebo (0.9% saline solution). Patients, anesthetist, surgeon, and other medical and nursing staff were blinded to the contents of the medications. VAS scores at resting and on coughing and analgesic consumptions were compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

the Group 1 (Ketamine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine 1 mg/kg (Ketalar®, 10 mL inj., 50 mg ketamine hydrochloride/ml, Pfizer Drug Company, USA). The Group 2 (Bupivacaine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of 20 mL (100 mg) of bupivacaine 0.5% (Marcaine®, 20 mL inj. 5 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride/ml, AstraZeneca Drug Company, Turkey). The Group 3 (Ketamine+Bupivacaine, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine 1 mg/kg (Ketalar®) plus subcutaneous infiltration of 20 mL (100 mg) of bupivacaine 0.5% (Marcaine®). The Group 4 (Placebo, n=30) received subcutaneous infiltration of 30 mL placebo (0.9% saline solution). All medications were diluted with sterile 0.9% saline solution to 30 ml solutions in the similar volume and shape syringes and were infiltrated subcutaneously along the skin wound edges and close to the fascia prior to skin closure. There were four separate syringes which were prepared by an anesthesiology technician for four different treatment groups labeled G1, G2, G3 and G4 containing the ketamine, bupivacaine, ketamine plus bupivacaine and normal saline solution. Patients, anesthetist, surgeon, and other medical and nursing staff were blinded to the contents of the medications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kayseri, Turkey
        • Kayseri Educational and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • singleton term pregnancy,
  • between 38-41th weeks of gestation,
  • absence of any medical or obstetrical problems.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • multiple pregnancies,
  • intrauterine fetal deaths,
  • active stage of labor,
  • obstetric emergencies such as antepartum hemorrhage, eclampsia and acute fetal distress,
  • special request for general anesthesia,
  • history of allergic reaction or sensitivity to any of the drugs used in the study,
  • reflected anxiety and depression during the cesarean operation,
  • any systemic diseases (chronic hypertension, thyroid diseases, renal or hepatic insufficiency, psychiatric disorders,
  • chronic pain syndrome, epilepsy or intracranial hypertension)
  • medications that would affect the perception of pain,
  • current or past history of narcotic use or a history of narcotic abuse,
  • inability to understand how to score a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1, Ketamine
Ketamine, 1 mg/kg (Ketalar®, 10 mL inj., 50 mg ketamine hydrochloride/ml, Pfizer Drug Company, USA) was administered subcutaneously before the closure of pfannenstiel incision.
Subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine
Other Names:
  • Ketalar
Active Comparator: Group 2, Bupivacaine
Bupivacaine 0.5% 20 mL (100 mg) (Marcaine®, 20 mL inj. 5 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride/ml, AstraZeneca Drug Company, Turkey) was administered subcutaneously before the closure of pfannenstiel incision.
Subcutaneous infiltration of bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Active Comparator: Group 3, Ketamine+Bupivacaine
Ketamine 1 mg/kg (Ketalar®) and bupivacaine 0.5% (100 mg) (Marcaine®) were administered subcutaneously before the closure of pfannenstiel incision.
Subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine
Other Names:
  • Ketalar
Subcutaneous infiltration of bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Placebo Comparator: Group 4, Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline solution) was administered subcutaneously before the closure of pfannenstiel incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative visual analog scale pain score
Time Frame: Postoperative 12 hours
Postoperative 12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 12 hours
Postoperative 12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Subscribe