CLG561 Proof-of-Concept Study as a Monotherapy and in Combination With LFG316 in Subjects With Geographic Atrophy (GA)

May 17, 2019 updated by: Alcon Research

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Single Masked, Sham Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of Intravitreal CLG561 as a Monotherapy and in Combination With LFG316 in Subjects With Geographic Atrophy

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 (every 28 days) intravitreal (IVT) injections of CLG561 as a monotherapy and in combination with LFG316 as compared to sham in subjects with geographic atrophy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study consists of an up-to 30-day screening period, an approximately 336-day treatment period, and a follow-up period consisting of two visits occurring 4 and 16 weeks after the last administered injection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign written informed consent form;
  • Geographic atrophy in both eyes;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women and women of child-bearing potential;
  • Any medical condition (systemic or ophthalmic) that may preclude the safe administration of test article or safe participation in this study;
  • Any contraindications or hypersensitivities to any component of the LFG316 or CLG561 solution;
  • Any contraindications to IVT injections;
  • Ocular surgery in either eye within 90 days of screening;
  • Uncontrolled ocular hypertension or glaucoma in the study eye;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CLG561
CLG561 10 mg, one IVT injection every 28 days for a total of 12 injections
Experimental: CLG561+LFG316
CLG561 5mg + LFG316 5 mg, one IVT injection every 28 days for a total of 12 injections
Sham Comparator: Sham Injection
One sham injection every 28 days for total of 12 sham injections
Empty syringe (without a needle) placed against the eye

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With a Serious Adverse Event That, in the Opinion of the Investigator, is Related to the Study Drug
Time Frame: Up to Day 421
A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any adverse experience that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. All SAEs related to the study drug are reported. No statistical analysis was conducted.
Up to Day 421
Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. No statistical analysis was conducted.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309
Change in GA Lesion Size From Baseline to Day 337 as Measured by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 337
Geographic atrophy, also known as atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or advanced dry AMD, is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration that can result in the progressive and irreversible loss of retina which can lead to a loss of visual function over time. Geographic atrophy (GA) lesion size was assessed by a Central Reading Center (CRC) using FAF. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 337

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in GA Lesion Size From Baseline to Day 85, 169, and 253 as Measured by FAF
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 85, Day 169, Day 253
Geographic atrophy, also known as atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or advanced dry AMD, is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration that can result in the progressive and irreversible loss of retina which can lead to a loss of visual function over time. Geographic atrophy (GA) lesion size was assessed by a Central Reading Center (CRC) using FAF. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 85, Day 169, Day 253
Mean Change in GA Lesion Size From Baseline to Day 421 as Measured by FAF
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 421
Geographic atrophy, also known as atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or advanced dry AMD, is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration that can result in the progressive and irreversible loss of retina which can lead to a loss of visual function over time. Geographic atrophy (GA) lesion size was assessed by a Central Reading Center (CRC) using FAF. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Day 421 measurements were only summarized descriptively and did not include any statistical modeling.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 421
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline by Visit up to Day 337 as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 30, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
BCVA was assessed using ETDRS testing at 4 meters. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 30, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Change in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) From Baseline up to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Low Luminance Visual Acuity (VA) was assessed using ETDRS testing at 4 meters with a neutral density filter to reduce chart luminance to 3 candelas/m2. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Change in LLVA Deficit From Baseline up to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Low Luminance Visual Acuity (VA) was assessed using ETDRS testing at 4 meters with a neutral density filter to reduce chart luminance to 3 candelas/m2. A deficit in LLVA is defined as a loss in letters read from baseline. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. A negative change value indicates improvement (more letters read). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Average Change in BCVA From Baseline to the Period Day 281 to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
BCVA was assessed using ETDRS testing at 4 meters. Day 281, Day 309, and Day 337 were averaged and compared to baseline. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. No statistical analysis was conducted.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Average Change in LLVA From Baseline to the Period Day 281 to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
LLVA was assessed at 4 meters using a neutral density filter to reduce chart luminance to 3 candelas/m2. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. Day 281, Day 309, and Day 337 were averaged and compared to baseline. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. No statistical analysis was conducted.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Average LLVA Deficit (Letters) Change From Baseline at Day 281 to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
LLVA was assessed at 4 meters using a neutral density filter to reduce chart luminance to 3 candelas/m2. A deficit in LLVA is defined as a loss in letters read from baseline. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. Day 281, Day 309, and Day 337 were averaged and compared to baseline. A negative change value indicates improvement (more letters read). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Percentage of Subjects With Letter Change in BCVA From Baseline up to Day 337 as Measured by ETDRS
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 30, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
BCVA was assessed using ETDRS testing at 4 meters. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of treatment. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment and is reported categorically. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. No statistical analysis was conducted.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 30, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 197, Day 225, Day 253, Day 281, Day 309, Day 337
Total CLG561 Serum Concentrations up to Day 421
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 85, Day 169, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 421
Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 85, Day 169, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 421
Total LFG316 Serum Concentration up to Day 421
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 337, Day 421
Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 337, Day 421
Percentage of Subjects With Anti-CLG561 Antibodies up to Day 421
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), up to Day 421
Samples were collected and assessed for anti-CLG561 antibodies.
Baseline (Day 1), up to Day 421
Percentage of Subjects With Anti-LFG316 Antibodies up to Day 421
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), up to Day 421
Samples were collected and assessed for anti-LFG316 antibodies.
Baseline (Day 1), up to Day 421

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr Clinical Manager, Pharma, GCRA, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geographic Atrophy

Clinical Trials on CLG561

Subscribe