Caesarean Hysterectomy Versus Conservative Management of Placenta Accreta: A Comparative Study

March 2, 2025 updated by: Ahmed ElHarty, Cairo University
Placenta accreta rates are rising alongside the rising rates of caesarean deliveries. This has lead to a vast number of studies negotiating the histopathological nature, risk factors and outcomes of pregnancies complicated with placenta accreta. In the study the investigators re discussing the outcome of different plans of management of placenta accreta, namely caesarean hysterectomy and focal myometrium resection.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Rising rates of caesarean delivery worldwide and especially in Egypt have affected higher rates of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. The increasing prevalence of this life-threatening condition can be primarily prevented by efforts targeted at reducing primary caesarean deliveries as well as encouraging trial of labor after caesarean deliveries of carefully selected gravidas in well-equipped hospitals, capable of providing continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, along with offering one to one health care based systems with the capability of performing emergency caesarean deliveries when needed. As for secondary prevention, the best surgical approach to uterine incisions in caesarean deliveries is yet to be found and universally applied. The said approach will aim at decreasing short and long term complications of uterine scarification resulting in decreased number of placenta accreta cases and possibly downgrading their difficulty, too. Having failed to prevent such occurrence, optimization of PAS management can be attempted to try and decrease implicated injuries. As previously noted, multidisciplinary systematic approach of managing placenta accreta spectrum disorders is indispensable to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality afflicted by this grave condition. The said approach begins with identification of the risk factors of PAS occurrence, calculating pretest probability of PAS and thus early suspicion and referral can be offered by the widely applicable 2nd trimester anomaly scan. After confirming the diagnosis in the 3rd trimester, birthing plans are formulated according to the gravity of the condition assessed by the patient's clinical condition, the ultrasound scan signs, together with social factors as proximity to a healthcare facility capable of offering such management alongside the maternal take on prolonged hospitalization. Decision making and choosing the place of delivery is shared between the pregnant lady, her birth companion and her following up obstetrician. Since elective management of such cases has been proven to be associated with less adjacent organ injuries and associated morbidities, late preterm delivery is usually elected after a course of antenatal corticosteroids as per local protocol.

Guidelines concerned with PAS management still consider caesarean hysterectomy as the main management of placenta accreta disorders. Owing to the high rate of associated morbidity with caesarean hysterectomy, different researchers are hunting down updated recent management approaches with less morbidity and mortality.

Our study evaluated different outcomes with conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders, namely, focal myometrium resection of the adherent defective myometrium along with its overlying placenta after devascularization, as opposed to caesarean hysterectomy. Data will be observed in a total of 36 PAS patients managed in the OBGYN department, in Kasr Al-Ainy School of medicine hospital, with 18 patients undergoing the previously explained conservative management and 18 patients undergoing caesarean hysterectomy. Demographic data of both study groups, alongside operative time, adjacent organ injury estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, Inotropic support and ICU admission will be collected, recorded and analyzed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total number of 36 pregnant patients at or after 34 weeks diagnosed of having placenta accreta spectrum were admitted and managed in Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton pregnancy with living fetus
  • Average liquor: 5-25 cm
  • Gestational age ≥ 34 weeks at time of termination
  • Previous lower segment cesarean section/s
  • Suspected placenta accreta spectrum.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatic, cardio-pulmonary or coagulation disorders

    • Hemoglobin< 9.5g/dl
    • Ruptured membranes
    • Need for emergency delivery as Antepartum hemorrhage or contractions
    • Placental abruption
    • Lower uterine segment fibroids
    • Consent withdrawal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1 (Caesarean Hysterectomy group)
patients with placenta accreta spectrum undergoing caesarean hysterectomy.
Caesarean delivery followed by hysterectomy
2 ( Conservative Management group)
patients with placenta accreta spectrum undergoing focal myometrium resection
Focal myometrium resection of the area of diseased myometrium after delivery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative blood loss
Time Frame: 6 months
hemoglobin deficit in mg/dl
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative blood loss
Time Frame: 6months
visual estimation of operative blood loss in ml
6months
need for blood products transfusion
Time Frame: 6months
no of blood products transfused in both groups in no. of units
6months
adjacent organ injuries
Time Frame: 6months
rates of urinary bladder or ureteric injuries
6months
operative time
Time Frame: 6months
operative time in minutes
6months
ICU admission
Time Frame: 6months
need for ICU admission and length of stay in days
6months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstetric Complication

Clinical Trials on Caesarean Hysterectomy

Subscribe