Protected Versus Early Weight Bearing Post Microfracture Surgery

Randomised Control Trial Comparing Conservative Rehabilitation and Protected Weight Bearing Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation and Early Weight Bearing Post Microfracture Knee Surgery.

To test using a randomised control trial, whether conservative rehabilitation and protected weight bearing versus early weight bearing and accelerated rehabilitation affects patient outcomes post microfracture surgery of the knee.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

To test using a randomised control trial, whether conservative rehabilitation and protected weight bearing versus early weight bearing and accelerated rehabilitation affects patient outcomes post microfracture surgery of the knee.

Current practice in most units is to protect patients from weight bearing prior to entering a conservative physiotherapy rehabilitation program following microfracture surgery of the knee. At our unit we believe that protecting patients from weight bearing post microfracture surgery makes no difference to their outcome and only leads to a longer rehabilitation time and a delayed return to work and sports. Therefore we want to randomise patients who require microfracture surgery of the knee for cartilage defects into 2 post operative rehabilitation groups. One group will be able to weight bear early and will undergo an accelerated rehabilitation program whilst the other will be protected from weight bearing and will undergo a more conservative rehabilitation program. We will then follow patients up over a year and compare outcome data collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post operatively to see if there was any difference in outcomes between the 2 groups. As secondary outcomes we will also compare the patients in the two groups to see if there is a difference in time taken to return to work and sporting activities

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shropshire
      • Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom, SY10 7AG
        • The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS FT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 60 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 16-60 years. Mechanically stable knee joint at outpatient examination. MRI confirmed grade 3 or 4 non-kissing cartilage defect within the knee. Able to fully understand the process and study and give informed consent to participate.

Able to comply with the physiotherapy rehabilitation and follow up process.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Kissing cartilage defects. Defects deemed too large to undergo microfracture on MRI scan. Clinically unstable knee joint. Patients unable to consent to participation. Under 16 years of age or over 60 years of age. Patients likely to drop out of physiotherapy rehabilitation and study follow up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: early weight bearing
early weight bearing and accelerated physiotherapy rehabilitation
Physiotherapy rehabilitation
Active Comparator: protected weight bearing
protected weight bearing and conservative physiotherapy rehabilitation.
Physiotherapy rehabilitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Modified Tegner/Lysholm score from questionnaires.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to return to work.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Time to return to sporting activities
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Peter Gallacher, Surgeon, NHS Healthcare

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • version 4 28/08/2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Defect of Articular Cartilage

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy rehabilitation

3
Subscribe