Advances in Vestibular Rehabilitation

'Effectiveness of Customised Vestibular Rehabilitation With and Without Additional Dual-Task Training in Persons With a Chronic Vestibular Disorder. A Randomised Controlled Trial'

Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is an exercise-based programme to encourage central nervous system (CNS) compensation for vestibular dysfunction. There is moderate to strong evidence to support VRT as a safe, effective management in reducing dizziness, vertigo, associated falls and improving quality of life in people with a unilateral and bilateral peripheral vestibular disorder. However, the evidence to discriminate between differing forms of treatment is unclear and, although, approximately 50% to 80% of persons with a vestibular dysfunction achieve significant subjective symptom, gait, dynamic visual acuity and postural stability improvements, full recovery is less common for reasons that currently remain unknown. Thus, further studies are required to identify optimal VRT approaches.

The purpose of this investigation is to identify if the incorporation of dual-task (DT) exercises into a customised VRT programme will have an effect on treatment outcomes in persons with chronic vestibular disorders.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Vestibular
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation

Detailed Description

The vestibular system system (i.e. inner ear balance system) is responsible for sending information to the brain about how fast our head is moving as well as about static head position, is necessary for us to be able to see clearly when turning our heads, to navigate in the dark and to balance. Persons who have an inner ear balance disorder will commonly report subjective symptoms of dizziness, imbalance, blurry vision, difficulty concentrating, imbalance and increased falls. Customised vestibular rehabilitation is the mainstay of treatment for persons with an inner ear balance disorder. Eye, head and body movement exercises are included (i.e. walking while turning your head left and right to scan the road) as appropriate for each individual. Moderate to strong evidence exists to support vestibular rehabilitation as a safe, effective management for persons with an inner ear balance disorder. However, there is insufficient evidence to discriminate between differing forms of treatment and although approximately 50% to 80% of persons with a vestibular dysfunction achieve significant symptomatic (i.e. dizziness) and objective improvements with regards to their balance, walking and activities of daily living, some persons do not improve. The reasons for this remain unclear. Thus, although vestibular rehabilitation has been shown to be safe and effective, further studies are required to identify optimal vestibular rehabilitation treatment approaches. Dual-task training (i.e. simultaneously performing two different activities such as walking and talking) has been shown to be beneficial in improving balance and complex walking ability (i.e. walking with head turns) in older adults. However, no studies have investigated dual-tasking training in persons with a vestibular disorder. This is despite evidence showing that the ability to perform complex walking tasks is negatively affected in persons with a vestibular disorder when a cognitive (i.e. "thinking") task is added. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effect of customised vestibular rehabilitation with and without the incorporation of dual-task (DT) exercises on subjective symptom, objective complex walking tasks, "thinking" function and psychological state. The hypothesis is that customised vestibular rehabilitation incorporating DT exercises will provide greater benefit compared to customised vestibular rehabilitation in isolation.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 48
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Reza Razavi; Phone Number: 02078483224; Email: reza.razavi@kcl.ac.uk
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Marousa Pavlou; Phone Number: 02078486328; Email: marousa.pavlou@kcl.ac.uk

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom, SE1 1UL
    • Recruiting
    • King's College London
    • Contact: Marousa Pavlou; Phone Number: 02078486328; Email: marousa.pavlou@kcl.ac.uk
    • Contact: Viktoria Azoidou; Phone Number: Azoidou 02078486679; Email: viktoria.azoidou@kcl.ac.uk
    • Sub-Investigator: Irene Di Giulio
    • Sub-Investigator: Louisa Murdin
    • Sub-Investigator: Doris Bamiou

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• clinical diagnosis of a peripheral vestibular disorder
• chronic dizziness and/or unsteadiness
• 18 to 80 years' old
• previous vestibular rehabilitation programme completed with partial/no improvement
• willing to participate and to comply with the proposed training and testing regime

Exclusion Criteria:

Persons with

• central nervous system involvement, excluding migraine
• fluctuating symptoms, for example, active Ménière disease
• acute orthopaedic disorders influencing balance control and gait
• a score of < 23/30 on the MoCA
• a score of >15/21 on the HADS for the depression component indicating significant depression symptoms
• inability to attend sessions
• lack of a good grasp of written/spoken English will be excluded.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A; Vestibular participants undertaking a single-task vestibular rehabilitation	Other: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation; Participants will be randomly allocated, using a random number generator, to a 12-week supervised customised exercise group incorporating VRT programme without (Group A) or with cognitive DT exercises (Group B).
Experimental: Group B; Vestibular participants undertaking a dual-task vestibular rehabilitation	Other: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation; Participants will be randomly allocated, using a random number generator, to a 12-week supervised customised exercise group incorporating VRT programme without (Group A) or with cognitive DT exercises (Group B).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional Gait Assessment	The primary outcome is the Functional Gait Assessment which is a 10-item test that assesses performance on complex gait tasks (i.e. walking with head turns, stepping over an obstacle or stopping and turning). Scores range from 0 to 30. The highest score is 30 and greater outcomes are indicative of better performance while lower scores are indicative of poorer performance. The Functional Gait Assessment has been validated in healthy people, older adults with a history of falls and balance impairments, and people with a vestibular disorder. The minimal detectable change for Functional Gait Assessment is reported to be 6 points in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. Scores ≤22/30 identify fall risk and are predictable of falls in community-living older persons within 6 months.	10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional Gait Dual-Task Test	The FGA in isolation will always be completed first in (primary outcome measure), followed by the dual-task (DT) test conditions, which will be completed in random order. The cognitive DT condition will involve a numeracy and literacy task and the auditory stimuli will involve restaurant noise.	45 minutes
Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test	The Mini-Balance Evaluation Test is a measure of dynamic balance (anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation and dynamic gait). The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test consists of 14 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 28 points. Higher scores indicate better outcome while lower scores poorer outcome. Scores ≤ 20/32 indicate increased falls risk.	10 minutes
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery	Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery is a semiautomated computer program that utilizes a touch screen technology and press pad, to assess neurocognitive function. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery core cognition battery is a validated cognitive assessment system for assessing multiple components of cognitive function, including attention, visual memory, spatial memory, executive function and reaction time.	50 minutes
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool	The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool is a rapid screening tool for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The scores range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate better outcomes while lower scores are indicative of poorer outcomes. It has been recommended that a cut-off scores of 23/30 be used to identify multi-domain cognitive impairment.	5 minutes
Speech in Babble Test	The Speech in Babble Test is a low redundancy speech in babble type noise test. The Speech in Babble Test is presented on a calibrated computer using Matlab software. There are 8 in total phonemically and phonetically balanced word lists. The words are presented in the background of a 20-talker babble noise. Two randomly selected monosyllabic consonant vowel consonant word lists in a background of multitalker babble are presented to each ear (i.e. each ear is tested twice). The signal to noise ratio during the test is varied adaptively.	10 minutes
Standard pure tone audiometry	Standard pure tone audiometry is considered a 'gold' standard test of audiologic examination. This test will be completed with a portable calibrated audiometer (GSI Pello Standard model with DD45's, IP30 and B81, Serial Number: GS0071085, calibrated by Guymark UK Ltd).	10 minutes
Axivity Wrist Band 3-Axis logging accelerometer	Participants' physical activity level will be assessed using a wrist-worn accelerometer, the Axivity Wrist Band 3-Axis logging accelerometer. The Axivity Wrist Band 3-Axis logging accelerometer captures triaxial acceleration data at 100 Hz with a dynamic range of ±8 g and has been widely used in population-based studies to assess physical activity levels.	7 days
Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale	The Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale is a self-perceived questionnaire with 16 items and assesses balance confidence in daily activities. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better outcome while lower scores indicate poorer outcome. A score ≤67/100 indicate increased falls risk.	3 minutes
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale	The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, a 14-item scale which assesses non-somatic anxiety and depression symptoms, will also be completed. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each subscale with a score ≥8 proposed for the identification of caseness, for both depression and anxiety. Higher scores are indicative of poorer outcomes.	3 minutes
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index generates seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality while lower scores indicate better outcomes. In distinguishing good and poor sleepers, a global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score >5 yields a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5%.	3 minutes
Epworth Sleepiness Scale	The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a validated and widely used questionnaire exploring daytime sleepiness. It consists of eight questions that are added together to obtain a single number. Higher scores indicate sleeping disorder while lower scores are indicative of better outcomes. Scores range from 0 to 24. The reference range of 'normal' Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores is 0-10 while Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores of 11-24 represent increasing levels of 'excessive daytime sleepiness'.	3 minutes
EQ-5D-5L	The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems.	3 minutes
Vertigo Symptom Scale	The VSS is used to assess the frequency and severity of common vestibular (Vertigo Symptom Scale-V; e.g. vertigo, imbalance) and autonomic/somatic (Vertigo Symptom Scale-A; e.g. heart pounding, heavy feeling in the arms or legs) symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 60. Normalised scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating a higher (i.e. worse) level of symptoms while lower scores indicate better outcomes.	3 minutes
Situational Vertigo Questionnaire	The Situational Vertigo Questionnaire -shortened version measures how frequently symptoms are provoked or exacerbated in environments with visual vestibular mismatch or intense visual motion (e.g. travelling on escalators, crowds, scrolling computer screens). Scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate poorer outcomes while lower scores are indicative of better outcomes. Scores ≥0.7/4 indicate visual induced dizziness symptoms.	3 minutes
Dizziness Handicap Inventory	The Dizziness Handicap Inventory is a 25-item self-assessment inventory designed to evaluate self-perceived handicap imposed by symptoms of dizziness. It consists of three domains: emotional, functional and physical. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating greater perceived handicap while lower scores are indicative of better performance. Scores between 0-30, 31-60, and 61-100 on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory indicate mild, moderate, and severe perceived handicap respectively, and can differentiate a person's functional abilities.	3 minutes
Cognitive and Behavioural Symptom Questionnaire	The Cognitive and Behavioural Symptom Questionnaire is a measure of subjects' cognitive (i.e. beliefs) and behavioural responses to symptoms of their health condition. This measure includes five cognitive (i.e. beliefs) subscales: Symptom Focusing, Catastrophizing, Damaging Beliefs, Fear Avoidance and Embarrassment Avoidance; and two behavioural subscales: All or- Nothing and Avoidance/Rest.	3 minutes
The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised	The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised was used to measure participants' illness perceptions. The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised measures the key components in Leventhal's common sense self-regulatory model: Illness identity will measured by asking patients to indicate whether they have experienced and attribute a number of potential symptoms to their dizziness condition. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating increased illness identity while lower scores indicate better outcomes.	3 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: King's College London
• Collaborators: University College London Hospitals; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Viktoria Azoidou, Ms

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991.
• Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
• Bisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker DE. Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009;19(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.3233/VES-2009-0343. No abstract available.
• Carson N, Leach L, Murphy KJ. A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):379-388. doi: 10.1002/gps.4756. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
• Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
• Davies RA, Luxon LM. Dizziness following head injury: a neuro-otological study. J Neurol. 1995 Mar;242(4):222-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00919595.
• Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, Waterston J, Seemungal B, Carey J, Bisdorff A, Versino M, Evers S, Newman-Toker D. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res. 2012;22(4):167-72. doi: 10.3233/VES-2012-0453.
• Neuhauser H, Leopold M, von Brevern M, Arnold G, Lempert T. The interrelations of migraine, vertigo, and migrainous vertigo. Neurology. 2001 Feb 27;56(4):436-41. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.4.436.
• Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;84(10):906-18.
• Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;38(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000015.
• Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):761-73. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090069. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
• Cambridge-Cognition-Limited. CANTABeclipse™: Test Administration Guide Manual. 3rd ed. Cambridge 2015.
• Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, Degrell I. Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 13;31(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
• Fowler KS, Saling MM, Conway EL, Semple JM, Louis WJ. Paired associate performance in the early detection of DAT. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jan;8(1):58-71.
• Yardley L, Masson E, Verschuur C, Haacke N, Luxon L. Symptoms, anxiety and handicap in dizzy patients: development of the vertigo symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 1992 Dec;36(8):731-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90131-k.
• Guerraz M, Yardley L, Bertholon P, Pollak L, Rudge P, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1646-56. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1646.
• Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540.
• Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, Cass SP, Clendaniel RA, Fife TD, Furman JM, Getchius TS, Goebel JA, Shepard NT, Woodhouse SN. Vestibular Rehabilitation for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION NEUROLOGY SECTION. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;40(2):124-55. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000120.
• Smith PF. Age-Related Neurochemical Changes in the Vestibular Nuclei. Front Neurol. 2016 Mar 3;7:20. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00020. eCollection 2016.
• Topuz O, Topuz B, Ardic FN, Sarhus M, Ogmen G, Ardic F. Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation on chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Feb;18(1):76-83. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr704oa.
• Arnold SA, Stewart AM, Moor HM, Karl RC, Reneker JC. The Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation Interventions in Treating Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review. Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jul;22(3). doi: 10.1002/pri.1635. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
• Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
• Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472. doi: 10.1002/mds.21720.
• Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):158-67. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120171. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
• Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Utility of the Mini-BESTest, BESTest, and BESTest sections for balance assessments in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;35(2):90-7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a620c.
• King L, Horak F. On the mini-BESTest: scoring and the reporting of total scores. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):571-5. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2013.93.4.571. No abstract available.
• Bamiou DE, Iliadou VV, Zanchetta S, Spyridakou C. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires? J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):824-37. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15009.
• British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2017.
• British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2011.
• Doherty A, Jackson D, Hammerla N, Plotz T, Olivier P, Granat MH, White T, van Hees VT, Trenell MI, Owen CG, Preece SJ, Gillions R, Sheard S, Peakman T, Brage S, Wareham NJ. Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0169649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169649. eCollection 2017.
• Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):197-201. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
• Clarke CL, Taylor J, Crighton LJ, Goodbrand JA, McMurdo MET, Witham MD. Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):451-457. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0604-8. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
• Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
• Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011.
• Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Brown KE, Furman JM. Is perception of handicap related to functional performance in persons with vestibular dysfunction? Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00010.
• Skerrett TN, Moss-Morris R. Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients' cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.018.
• Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ et al. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPR-Q). Psychol Health 2002; 17(1): 1-16.
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.
• Lajoie Y, Gallagher SP. Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(03)00082-7.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 24, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): August 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 28, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 28, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): October 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 7, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 5, 2019
• Last Verified: July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: rehabilitation; Gait; dizziness; Vestibular; dual-tasking
• Other Study ID Numbers: 19/LO/1066

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No
• IPD Plan Description: IPD will be processed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation 2016 (GDPR). All information collected will be kept strictly confidential and stored anonymously on password protected computers used only by research staff. Data will be stored securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act (1998) and the General Data Protection Regulations which came into effect on 25 May 2018. IPD will not be passed on to anyone outside of participant's medical care team. Stored, anonymised data may be used for future medical and health-related studies. IPD will be retained for 10 years after it has been collected.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No