- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02555722
Evaluation of the CooperVision, Inc. Fanfilcon A and Enfilcon A Daily Wear Contact Lenses When Used for Frequent Replacement for up to One (1) Month of Daily Wear
September 16, 2019 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.
This study is a masked, multi-center, daily wear, monthly replacement, bilateral, randomized, lens blocked (subjects remain in the same lens brand throughout the study) concurrent control study enrolling up to 90 subjects with a study duration of approximately three months.
Subjects will be randomized into the study contact lenses in a two to one (2:1) ratio of fanfilcon A lens (test) to enfilcon A lens (control).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Subjects will be randomized into the study contact lenses in a two to one (2:1) ratio of fanfilcon A lens (test) to enfilcon A lens (control).
This should result in a study population of approximately 60 test subjects and 30 control subjects.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
92
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92123
- Eric White, O.D., Inc.
-
Torrance, California, United States, 90503
- Mark Nakano, O.D.
-
-
North Carolina
-
Denver, North Carolina, United States, 28037
- Advanced Family Eye Care
-
-
Ohio
-
Athens, Ohio, United States, 45701
- Quinn, Foster & Associates
-
Beachwood, Ohio, United States, 44122
- Western Reserve Vision Care, Inc.
-
-
Tennessee
-
Brentwood, Tennessee, United States, 37027-7552
- Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study.
Have:
- Read the Informed Consent
- Been given an explanation of the Informed Consent
- Indicated understanding of the Informed Consent
- Signed the Informed Consent document.
- Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments.
- Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses at least 5 days per week for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study.
- Possess or obtain prior to dispensing, wearable and visually functional (20/40 or better) eyeglasses.
- Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
- Require spectacle lens powers between -0.50 and -8.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.50 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes.
- Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than20/25 in each eye.
- To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must achieve 20/30 VA or better in each eye with the study lens and the investigator must judge the fit as acceptable or optimal.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes for the duration of the study. Note: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis.
- Poor personal hygiene.
- Any active participation in another clinical trial during this trial or within 30 days prior to this study.
- To the best of the subject's knowledge, she is currently pregnant, is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months.
- A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff.
- Has a known sensitivity to the ingredients used in the Multi-Purpose Disinfection Lens Care System (MPS) approved for use in the study and is unable or unwilling to use the alternate care system.
- Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment.
- Is aphakic or pseudophakic.
- Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, keratoconus or uncontrolled diabetes.
- The need for topical ocular medications or any systemic medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or require the lenses to be removed during the day.
- The presence of clinically significant (grade 2, 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; or the presence of any inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
- A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, iritis, bacterial or fungal infections.
- A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear.
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to:
- Pathological dry eye or associated dry eye symptoms with decreased tear levels and punctuate staining > Grade 2
- Pterygium
- Corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization or ghost vessels > 1.0 mm in from the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) of > Grade 2
- Anterior uveitis or iritis
- Seborrheic eczema, seborrheic conjunctivitis or blepharitis
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: fanfilcon A (test)
Subjects will be randomized to wear fanfilcon A lens (test) for one month of daily wear during the study.
|
silicone hydrogel lens
|
|
Active Comparator: enfilcon A (control)
Subjects will be randomized to wear enfilcon A lens (control) for one month of daily wear during the study.
|
silicone hydrogel lens
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Epithelial Edema - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Epithelial edema is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Epithelial Edema - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Epithelial edema is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Stromal Edema - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Stromal edema is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Stromal Edema - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Stromal edema is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Infiltrates - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal infiltrates is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading scale: Absent/present
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Infiltrates - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal infiltrates is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading scale: absent/present
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Vascularization - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal vascularization is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Vascularization - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal vascularization is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Staining - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal staining with fluorescein is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe; Grading regions: S - Superior, T - Temporal, C - Central, N - Nasal, I - Inferior;
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Corneal Staining - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Corneal staining with fluorescein is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe; Grading regions: S - Superior, T - Temporal, C - Central, N - Nasal, I - Inferior;
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Limbal Hyperemia - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Limbal Hyperemia - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Bulbar Hyperemia - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Bulbar Hyperemia - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Palpebral Conjunctiva - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Palpebral conjunctiva is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test).
Grading scale: Absent/present
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Palpebral Conjunctiva - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Palpebral conjunctiva is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control).
Grading scale: absent/present
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Visual Acuity - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Visual acuity is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test) using Snellen chart.
|
Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Visual acuity is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control) using Snellen chart.
|
Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Average Wearing Time - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Average lens wearing time for fanfilcon A lens (test) measured in hours.
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Average Wearing Time - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Average lens wearing time for enfilcon A lens (control) measured in hours.
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comfort - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Fanfilcon A lens (test) are assessed regarding comfort for the following: comfort upon insertion (CUI), comfort during the day (CDD), end of the day comfort (EDC), overall comfort (OC), and comfort at visit (CV).
Subjects were asked to rate comfort from 0-5 (0=excellent, 1=very comfortable, 2=comfortable, 3=slightly uncomfortable, 4=very uncomfortable, or 5=causes pain).
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Comfort - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months follow-up
|
Enfilcon A lens (control) are assessed regarding comfort for the following: comfort upon insertion (CUI), comfort during the day (CDD), end of the day comfort (EDC), overall comfort (OC), and comfort at visit (CV).
Subjects were asked to rate comfort from 0-5 (0=excellent, 1=very comfortable, 2=comfortable, 3=slightly uncomfortable, 4=very uncomfortable, or 5=causes pain).
|
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months follow-up
|
|
Overall Vision Quality - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Overall vision quality (OVQ) and vision at night (VAN) is assessed at the specific time points.
Subjects were asked to rate vision from 0-5, (0=excellent, 1=very good, 2=good, 3=poor, 4=very poor, 5= unacceptable).
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Overall Vision Quality - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Overall vision quality (OVQ) and vision at night (VAN) is assessed at the specific time points.
Subjects were asked to rate vision from 0-5, (0=excellent, 1=very good, 2=good, 3=poor, 4=very poor, 5= unacceptable).
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Ease of Insertion and Removal - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Ease of Insertion (EOI) and removal (EOR) was assessed.
Subjects were asked to rate ease of insertion and removal on scale 0-5 (0=excellent, 1=very good, 2=good, 3=poor, 4=very poor, or 5=unmanageable.
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Ease of Insertion and Removal - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Ease of Insertion (EOI) and removal (EOR) was assessed.
Subjects were asked to rate ease of insertion and removal on scale 0-5 (0=excellent, 1=very good, 2=good, 3=poor, 4=very poor, or 5=unmanageable.
|
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eric M White, OD, Eric White, O.D., Inc.
- Principal Investigator: Peter T Van Hoven, OD, Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
- Principal Investigator: Amanda L Barker, OD, Advanced Family Eye Care
- Principal Investigator: Mark E Nakano, OD, Mark Nakano, O.D.
- Principal Investigator: Thomas G Quinn, OD, Quinn, Foster & Associates
- Principal Investigator: Mary Jo Stiegemeier, OD, Western Reserve Vision Care, Inc
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 21, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 27, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 18, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 21, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 25, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 16, 2019
Last Verified
September 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FC150625
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myopia
-
Tianjin Medical University Eye HospitalNot yet recruitingProgressive Myopia | Pediatric Myopia | Orthokeratology-related Myopia Progression
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruitingMyopia | Myopia, ProgressiveChina
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.Recruiting
-
University of FaisalabadCompletedRefractive Errors | Myopia | Progressive MyopiaPakistan
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.RecruitingMyopia | Myopia Progression | Juvenile MyopiaUnited States
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterEnrolling by invitationMyopia, Child Myopia ProgressionChina
-
He Eye HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University Eye Hospital, FreiburgActive, not recruiting
-
University of BradfordUniversity of Huddersfield; CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)Enrolling by invitationMyopia, ProgressiveUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on fanfilcon A (test)
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedAstigmatism | Myopia | HyperopiaCanada, United States
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedAstigmatismUnited States
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed