Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Bladder Cancer

November 2, 2018 updated by: Robert J Amato, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Urothelial Cancer

This trial is for people with bladder cancer that has spread. The purpose of this research study is to see if the chemotherapy combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin plus paclitaxel is safe and effective treatment for bladder cancer.

Paclitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin have all been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a standard treatment for bladder cancer. There have been studies that show that paclitaxel and cisplatin have antitumor activity in bladder cancer. European researchers studied paclitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin (same drug combination in this trial) and found that the combination provided good disease control and was well tolerated. Investigators are studying the same drug combination, but at different dosages and schedule.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

The rationale of the present study is to develop a combination based on the pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action of the agents paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and cisplatin, which are all known active agents in urothelial tumors. Gemcitabine may be synergistic with DNA-damaging drugs such as paclitaxel and cisplatin because it can antagonize DNA repair. Investigators will investigate the combination in this Phase II study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • UTHealth Memorial Hermann Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients must have histologic demonstration of metastatic or locally unresectable transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Minor components (<50% overall) of variants such as glandular or squamous differentiation, or evolution to more aggressive phenotypes, such as sarcomatoid, or small cell changes are acceptable. However, when these atypical histologies are dominant, other treatment approaches may be more appropriate, and such patients are not eligible.
  • All patients must have measurable or evaluable disease. In general, liver and lung lesions should be at least 1 cm, and patients with node-only disease should have lesions of ≥ 1.5 cm in the largest dimension. Patients with disease confined to bone may be eligible if a measurable lytic defect is present. Patients with a 3-dimensional mass or pelvic sidewall fixation on bladder examination under anesthesia are considered to have measurable disease.
  • All patients must have adequate physiologic reserves as evidenced by:
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤2.
  • No clinical history of heart disease and a normal EKG or an ejection fraction measured by echocardiogram or MUGA scan of at least 45%.
  • Transaminase less than twice the upper limit of normal. Bilirubin <1.5 mg%.
  • Serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL. Patients presenting with obstructive uropathy may be eligible if they show excellent response to nephrostomy drainage.
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥1500; platelet count ≥100,000.
  • Patients must not have had any previous systemic chemotherapy for bladder cancer, including neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment given remotely. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is the standard of care for metastatic urothelial cancer. Patients who have received treatment would be either resistant or refractory to additional doses. In addition, they would have residual adverse effects from treatment and would be particularly susceptible to further neuropathic adverse events. Any prior intravesicular therapy is allowed.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to starting therapy. Men and women of childbearing potential must be willing to consent using effective contraceptive while on treatment and for a reasonable period thereafter.
  • Patients must not have an active, or likely to become active, second malignancy.
  • Patients must be at least 6 weeks out from pelvic irradiation, and must not have had more than 10% of the bone marrow irradiated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled CNS metastasis are not eligible.
  • Patients with a history of peripheral neuropathy greater than grade 1 are not eligible.
  • Pregnant women are excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination chemotherapy
Combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and cisplatin plus paclitaxel on a 21-day cycle.
1000 mg/m2 will be administered as an IV infusion over 10 mg/minute on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle (each cycle is 21 days).
Other Names:
  • Gemzar
175 mg/m2 will be administered as an IVPB over 3 hours on Day 2 of each cycle (each cycle is 21 days).
Other Names:
  • Taxol
70 mg/m2 will be administered as an IVPB over 2 hours on Day 2 of each cycle (each cycle is 21 days).
Other Names:
  • Platinol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy as Measured by the Objective Response Rate (ORR).
Time Frame: From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients achieving either a complete response or a partial response based on imaging at any time during the study. Complete response or partial response is based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of Drug Regimen as Measured by Number of Adverse Events
Time Frame: From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months
Toxicity assessment will be observational. Numbers and types of events will be quantified and graded according to CTCAE.
From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months
Efficacy as Measured by Number Who Progressed
Time Frame: From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months
Progression is defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria: " At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)."
From the time the participant signs the informed consent until the participant was taken off-study or the study was stopped, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert J Amato, DO, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Gemcitabine

3
Subscribe