Routine Antibiotic vs. Directed Antibiotic Treatment in Snake Bite (RADIANS)

August 11, 2020 updated by: Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, MD, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research

Routine vs. Clinically-Directed Antibiotic Treatment in Snake Bite With Local Envenomation: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Clinicians tend to overuse antibiotics in snake bite despite evidence from three previous clinical trials that failed to show a benefit. But, none of these trials was done in India. Further, the species of snake in two of these trials was quite different from that seen in the Indian setting limiting generalization of these findings. Hence, home-grown evidence is needed to persuade clinicians to use antibiotics rationally.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Snake bite is a common clinical problem in India and elsewhere, affecting agricultural workers and rural population, resulting in thousands of deaths every year. Apart from causing systemic manifestations such as coagulopathy, acute renal failure, and neuroparalysis, local effects of the venom manifest as swelling of the bitten limb. Despite administration of adequate antivenom, the limb swelling progresses in the first 48-72 hours accompanied by considerable pain. Often the limb swelling is accompanied by formation of blebs and gangrenous skin changes. At times, the limb swelling is severe enough to result in compartment syndrome, necessitating surgical interventions such as fasciotomy and debridement. Animal bites are typically associated with a risk of infection by the oral flora. Likewise, apart from releasing the venom, inoculation of oral flora as a result of snake bite could result in local infectious complications adding to the deleterious effects of the snake venom.

Observational studies suggest that the risk of infection following simple bites on the lower limbs is much less than what is often believed, and evidence from clinical trials also does not support routine use of antibiotics in snake bite. For this reason, clinical practice guidelines do not recommend routine prophylactic use of antibiotics in snake bite. But, in reality, many clinicians continue to use antibiotics routinely in all venomous snake bites hoping to prevent a local infection. While such a strategy may not reduce the risk of infection, it would result in overuse of antibiotics promoting antimicrobial resistance and escalating treatment costs.

The investigators hypothesize that clinically-directed use of antibiotics would be non-inferior to routine use in preventing local infectious complications of snake bite, while being superior in reducing the antibiotic consumption. Non-inferiority would be inferred if the one-sided 95% CI of the difference does not exceed 10% in favour of the routine use arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

130

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Puducherry
      • Pondicherry, Puducherry, India, 605006
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chanaveerappa Bammigatti, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Aditya Gautam, M.B.,B.S.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years
  • History of snake bite with features of local envenomation with/without systemic features
  • Less than 24 hours since bite, AND
  • No prior antibiotic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper limb bites
  • Multiple (> 1) bites
  • Wound manipulation
  • Extensive local necrosis or blebs
  • Seriously-ill patients with hypotension/capillary leak/life threatening bleeding.
  • Suspected cobra bite, OR
  • Pregnant/breast-feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Routine use arm

All participants allocated to this arm will be given

  • Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat
  • Antibiotic (Co-amoxiclav) will be given to all patients for a minimum duration of 5 days.
  • Daily clinical assessment would be done. Change of antibiotics is allowed if clinical failure occurs.

Use of antibiotics for emergent indications unrelated to the bitten limb such as nosocomial infections would be allowed at the treating physician's discretion.

Injection Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g intravenously q8h for a minimum of 48-72 hours; switched to oral Co-amoxiclav 625 mg b.i.d. when clinically appropriate.
Other Names:
  • Augmentin
Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat
Experimental: Clinically-directed use arm

Participants allocated to this arm will be given

  • Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat
  • Daily clinical assessment would be done. Antibiotic (Co-amoxiclav) will be started only if clinical failure occurs.

Use of antibiotics for emergent indications unrelated to the bitten limb such as nosocomial infections would be allowed at the treating physician's discretion.

Injection Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g intravenously q8h for a minimum of 48-72 hours; switched to oral Co-amoxiclav 625 mg b.i.d. when clinically appropriate.
Other Names:
  • Augmentin
Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical failure
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Defined as occurrence of any one of the following on daily assessments - Abscess formation at any point of time; Surgical debridement/fasciotomy at any time; Worsening limb swelling beyond 72-96 hours or appearance of necrosis or blebs along with any one of the following: fever, persistent or worsening leucocytosis, or global deterioration on clinical assessment.
up to 4 weeks
Antibiotic consumption
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Defined as the total amount of all antibiotics consumed regardless of clinical indication expressed in terms of defined daily doses (DDD).
up to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Number of days from hospital admission until discharge
up to 4 weeks
Anti-snake venom consumption
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
The total number of vials of the anti-venom administered including doses received prior to being brought to JIPMER.
up to 4 weeks
New-onset organ failure
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
This includes acute kidney injury (AKI) defined as peak serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL, shock defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg requiring use of vasopressors; bleeding from any site necessitating transfusion of blood/blood products; and capillary leak syndrome.
up to 4 weeks
Death/need for surgical intervention
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
This would be a composite measure of death and/or need for surgical intervention. Death indicates in-hospital death due to any cause during the index hospitalisation. Surgical intervention would include need for any surgical intervention such as incision and drainage of abscess, wound debridement for necrosis or gangrene, fasciotomy for compartment syndrome, etc.
up to 4 weeks
Drug-related adverse events
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Any suspected or confirmed adverse drug reaction
up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, M.D., Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Snake Bites

Clinical Trials on Co-amoxiclav

3
Subscribe