577nm Micropulse Laser vs Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy on Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

April 4, 2022 updated by: Jin Chen-jin, Sun Yat-sen University

Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of 577nm Micropulse Laser vs Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy on Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether micropulse laser (MPL) is different to half-dose photodynamic therapy on acute central serous chorioretinopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Central serous chorioretinopathy(CSC) is characterized by serous detachment of neurosensory retina which can cause lose in visual acuity.Some studies have shown that Half-dose photodynamic therapy(PDT) is effective on CSC,although accompanied with side-effects,such as choroidal ischemia, retinal pigmental epithelium(RPE) atrophy,and RPE rip,and with exorbitant price.Recent retrospective studies suggest micropulse laser (MPL) therapy may also be effective without obvious complications in this disease. But to date, there is no study on effectiveness of CSC between PDT and MPL.

The study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial about 577nm micropulse laser versus half-dose photodynamic therapy on acute central serous chorioretinopathy.The null hypothesis of the study is that there is difference between MPL and half-dose photodynamic therapy on acute central serous chorioretinopathy at first month after treatment.The primary outcome measures is the proportion of eyes with complete absorption of subretinal fluid at 1 month after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. onset for the first time, as an episode duration of less than 6 months
  2. patient was between 18 and 55 years of age
  3. the presence of subretinal fluid(SRF) involving the macula and detected by use of optical coherence tomography (OCT)
  4. active fluorescein leakage during fluorescein angiography (FA)
  5. best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) more than 0.1, and less than 1.0

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous PDT, focal photocoagulation, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, or ocular surgery
  2. other macular abnormalities such as choroidal neovascularization(CNV) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV)
  3. retinal atrophy
  4. pregnancy
  5. inability to obtain photographs or to perform FA
  6. use of steroid systemically or topically in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 577-MPL
577nm micropulse laser(577-MPL) will be performed of the areas identified on hyperfluorescent "hot spots" on the mid-phase (3 minutes) fluorescein.Multiple laser spots will be applied, covering the leakage area.
All treatments were provided by a single practitioner with the 577-nm yellow laser system(Supra 577nm LaserSystem) in 577-MPL arm. The individual power for the patient was titrated at a normal area of near the affected area in micropulse model.The power titration was started at 700 milliwatt(mW) and then gradually increased until a just visible burn was seen. When this threshold was reached, the power was reduced by 50%, using a 100-μm spot diameter and a 200-ms duration with 5 % duty cycle.
Active Comparator: HD-PDT
Half-dose photodynamic therapy (HD-PDT) is administered to the patients. At 15 minutes after the start of the infusion, PDT laser treatment is performed with standard 50 J/cm2 fluency, a wavelength of 689nm, and a treatment duration of 83 seconds.
5 minutes after the start of the half-dose verteporfin infusion, the PDT treatment will been performed in HD-PDT arm. The treatment is performed with standard fluency (50 J/cm2), a PDT laser wavelength of 689 nm, and a standard treatment duration of 83 seconds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of eyes with complete absorption of subretinal fluid(SRF)
Time Frame: 1 month
The primary outcome measure is the OCT-based improvement rate (defined as the proportion of eyes with complete absorption of subretinal fluid on OCT images
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month
1 month, 3 month, 6 month
Change of fundus autofluorescence
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month
Fundus autofluorescence will be evaluated for different patterns(normal, increased, and decreased)before and after treatment
1 month, 3 month, 6 month
Change in 10°retinal sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month
Retinal sensitivity will be measured by microperimetry
1 month, 3 month, 6 month
the proportion of eyes with complete absorption of subretinal fluid(SRF)
Time Frame: 6 month
The outcome measure is the OCT-based improvement rate (defined as the proportion of eyes with complete absorption of subretinal fluid on OCT images
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 577MPLACS(Marshall Study)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

it is undecided to make individual participant data available when the study is going on

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Clinical Trials on 577-MPL

Subscribe