A Phase II Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Endostar® Continuous Intravenous Infusion in Refractory NPC

December 20, 2017 updated by: Yun-fei Xia

A Multi-institutional, Randomized Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial on Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Nedaplatin Plus 5-Fu Combined With and Without Endostar® Continuous Intravenous Infusion in Refractory Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

We define refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma as the following: recurrence with radiation brain injury after radiotherapy, recurrence after the second or more courses of radiotherapy, standard treatment failure after recurrence, and first-line treatment failure after multiple distant metastasis.

There is no standard treatment for refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Platinum plus 5-Fu is the classic regimen for primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Endostatin is a multiple targeted angiogenesis inhibitor acting on tumor associated neovascular endothelial cells, normalizing the morphology and function of tumor vasculature, and indirectly leading to the quiescence or reduction of tumors.

The purpose of this phase II clinical trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion combined with endostar® (Recombinant Human Endostatin Injection) continuous intravenous infusion compared with nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion alone in refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The study hypothesis is that nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion combined with endostar® continuous intravenous infusion is effective and safe in refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the extension of survival time in nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC), more and more patients suffer from recurrence with radiation brain injury after radiotherapy, recurrence after the second or more courses of radiotherapy, standard treatment failure after recurrence, and first-line treatment failure after multiple distant metastasis. We define these four types as refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma[1-2] due to the complex and high risk of treatment and poor prognosis. For recurrence and metastasis NPC, the objective response rate ranges from 25% to 46.4% with platinum-based, or 5-Fu-based, or gemcitabine-based salvage chemotherapy[2--5].

At present, there is no standard treatment for refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Most patients in this trial were pretreated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Nedaplatin has the equivalent antitumor effect with cisplatin and less renal toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of NPC[6]. In addition, nedaplatin does not have the cross tolerance with cisplatin. After cisplatin failure, nedaplatin(80-100 mg/m2) still work in NPC treatment[3].

5-Fu is a classic, effective, and safe chemotherapeutic drug in NPC treatment. Low dose continuous intravenous infusion of 5-Fu(300mg/m2/d, 6 weeks) is a effective regimen for recurrent and metastasis NPC with low toxicity[4].

Endostatin is a multiple targeted angiogenesis inhibitor acting on tumor associated neovascular endothelial cells, normalizing the morphology and function of tumor vasculature, and indirectly leading to the quiescence or reduction of tumors[7-9]. Anti-angiogenic therapy might optimally require that endothelial cells be exposed to steady blood levels of the inhibitor, and blood levels of certain angiogenesis inhibitors (such as endostatin) that are too high or too low will be ineffective[7,10]. Endostar® is recombinant human endostatin injection with better medicinal properties, stability and curative effect. Hoekman K. etc conducted a phase I clinical pharmacokinetic study in advanced cancer and the results showed that continuous intravenous pump of endostar® is safe[11]. Moreover, endostar® combined with chemotherapy can improve the outcome of the chemotherapy alone and does not increase the treatment related toxicity, such as in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[12], advanced cervical cancer[13], advanced gastric cancer[14] and also metastasis NPC[15].

Given that the patients in this trial have the following features: had received standard radical treatment, poor tolerance of treatment due to the toxicity after many courses of chemotherapy, and the present treatment goal is palliative therapy. Therefore, the treatment principle in this trial is using low toxicity, well tolerance treatment regimen to relieve and control tumor, improve the quality of life, and further to prolong the survival time.

Based on above background and considering the Efficacy and tolerability, we use nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion as chemotherapy regimen, and administrate endostar® in continuous intravenous infusion.

This phase II randomized controlled trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion combined with endostar® (Recombinant Human Endostatin Injection) continuous intravenous infusion compared with nedaplatin plus continuous low dose 5-Fu intravenous infusion alone in refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

328

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chen Chen, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have provided a signed Informed Consent Form.
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma (the best), or when histology is difficult to obtained, the following clinical diagnosis of refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma must be confirmed: clear and directional clinical symptoms, at least two kinds of imaging diagnosis on the basis of magnetic resonance (MR), and clear and directional signs.
  • Age: 18-70 years old.
  • Without dysfunction of heart, lung, liver, kidney, and hematopoiesis, and normal electrocardiogram.
  • Karnofsky Performance Scores ≥ 50, Life expectancy ≥ 3 months, tolerance to at least two cycles of chemotherapy.
  • At least one measurable tumor based on RECIST 1.1 ( longest diameter: ≥20 mm by CT or magnetic resonance (MR) scan)
  • No history of serious allergic to biologic agents
  • No history of other malignant tumors, except cured cervical carcinoma in situ and basal skin cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having the serious cardiovascular disease or other serious complications.
  • Woman in pregnancy and breast-feeding.
  • Allergic to intervention drugs and dextran.
  • Patients participated in clinical trials of other drugs within 4 weeks.
  • Use of other chemotherapy drugs, biological treatment, and Chinese medicine anti-cancer drugs at the same time.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nedaplatin+5-Fu+Endostar
Drug: Recombinant Human Endostatin Injection (Endostar) Endostar, 15mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total Drug: Fluorouracil (5-Fu) 5-Fu, 200mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total Drug: Nedaplatin Nedaplatin, 80mg/m2/d, intravenous drip on d1 and d28 each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
15mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
Other Names:
  • Endostar
200mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
Other Names:
  • 5-Fu
80mg/m2/d, intravenous drip on d1 and d28 each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
Other Names:
  • Nedaplait
Active Comparator: Nedaplatin+5-Fu
Drug: Fluorouracil (5-Fu) 5-Fu, 200mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total Drug: Nedaplatin Nedaplatin, 80mg/m2/d, intravenous drip on d1 and d28 each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
200mg/m2/d, continuous intravenous infusion in 2ml/h for 30 days each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
Other Names:
  • 5-Fu
80mg/m2/d, intravenous drip on d1 and d28 each cycle, 60 days as one cycle, 6 cycles in total
Other Names:
  • Nedaplait

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective response (OR) rate based on Recist 1.1 edition
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration, evaluation of response was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months
include complete remission and partial remission
From the date of first drug administration, evaluation of response was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration, evaluation of response was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months
include complete remission, partial remission, and progressive disease
From the date of first drug administration, evaluation of response was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months
Progress Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months
3 years PFS
From the date of first drug administration until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration until the date of death, assessed up to 36 months
3 years OS
From the date of first drug administration until the date of death, assessed up to 36 months
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration, evaluation was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months, using NCI CTCAE version 4.0
Safety evaluation according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) 4.0
From the date of first drug administration, evaluation was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months, using NCI CTCAE version 4.0
Quality of life
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration, evaluation was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months, using EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
Quality of life evaluation according to EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
From the date of first drug administration, evaluation was performed every cycle during the treatment and then every 3 months after the completion of the treatment up to 36 months, using EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yun-fei Xia, Prof, Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Recombinant Human Endostatin Injection (Endostar)

3
Subscribe